Since I do support with wine I went and questioned on the IRC channel
with wine graphics developer I know.
>From everything they looked at the change should be fairly neutral as
those ID numbers behind those values should be the same. That why
they are not interested in fixing it at this time.
motherboard lacks the KEK the shim needs .Of course this does
not stop users making their own PK and KEK set latter and it not
against the rules to-do this.
Peter Dolding
is replaced. So that a person who has left is not
walking around with a master key.
How is this going to be performed is a very serous consideration.
Peter Dolding
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Peter Dolding oia...@gmail.com, 2014-03-04, 13:11:
wine should not be run as root. There is no wrapper on binfmt_misc to make
it fail in case of a .exe on root.
Why should such a protection be implemented in the wrapped
I think you have this issue backwards.Wine project in fact
recommends against using binfmt_misc with wine.
Building wine from source has never made binfmt-misc entries. The
binfmt_misc entries are something maintainers thought up as a good
idea.
Reasons why its an very wrong thing. 1
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:00 PM, ChaosEsque Team
chaosesquet...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ah, you're a systemd acolyte. You smugly proclaim that it is USELESS to
resist!
No wrong.There are just possible ways to resist. Then there are
impossible ways.
Forking every package that depends on
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:20 PM, ChaosEsque Team
chaosesquet...@yahoo.com wrote:
Honestly. I, and many many many others, do NOT WANT SYSTEMD.
We do not want to be forced or cajoled into using it.
NOR do we want to be PUNISHED for not using it.
heheh yea you don't have to use it, but nothing
Lets look at the problem little more broad than systemd vs upstart
the Linux kernel linked stuff.
Freebsd the most intergrated init system is most likely going to be
launchd or releation.
https://wiki.freebsd.org/launchd
Solaris Management Console is the most integrated init system with a
ChaosEsque Team chaosesquet...@yahoo.com
We have to see it for what it is. Lennart Pottering and his acolytes
who work within other projects are essentially forking Gnu/Linux and
are creating LennartOS.
Debian is a multi kernel solution. So solution has to deal with the
fact all OS's are
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Peter Dolding oia...@gmail.com writes:
ExecStartPre=, ExecStartPost= can be written many times.
ExecStartPre= rm somewhere
ExecStartPre= touch somewhere
That really doesn't help, because...
In fact lot of cases I see one
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Peter Dolding oia...@gmail.com writes:
The one property about systemd unit files that is extremely good is
there are no multi line commands. Every command is a single line.
Yes, that's exactly what I think is obnoxious. I
strange.
We are in a modern age of Languages there is no point taking in a init
system that forces the usage of one scripting interpreter that can
change and bring the system down.
Peter Dolding
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
to freebsd is showing missing features. So far no one other
me has went out and looked at the other kernels to see if the bsd line
is a edge. This case they are an outer edge.
Peter Dolding
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
.
Once I have that I will run a few other tests and might have a better clue
what is going wrong.
Yes this is land mining.
Peter Dolding
14 matches
Mail list logo
