Bug#840524: sardana: ipython transition: Please help assess the situation

2016-10-12 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
sardana 2.1.1-1~exp1 available into experimental is supporting python-qtconsole and ipython5 so this is not a problem for the transition. Cheers

Bug#840521: lmfit-py: ipython transition: Please help assess the situation

2016-10-12 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> we are planning to transition ipython from version 2.4 to 5 [1]. This > amounts to larger changes: ipython-notebook and ipython-qtconsole were > moved to a separate project, Jupyter. Packages for ipython 5 and several > Jupyter components are available in experimental (see [1]), however >

Bug#836850: pymca-doc: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/doc-base/pymca

2016-09-06 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Andreas, what is strange is this https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/state-successfully-tested.html#pymca-doc Is there a problem with piuparts ?

Bug#836350: RFS: flycheck/29-1 -- modern on-the-fly syntax checking for Emacs

2016-09-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Sean, in flycheck-doc, you put this +Depends: www-browser, elpa-flycheck (= ${source:Version}) +Suggests: elpa-flycheck why this dependency to elpa-flycheck ?

Bug#826042:

2016-08-21 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello during the packaging I get this error message for the tests == ERROR: spyderlib.widgets.tests.test_array_builder (unittest.loader.ModuleImportFailure) --

Bug#834895: fatal: refusing to merge unrelated histories

2016-08-21 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> So you're installing the .deb from stretch on your jessie machine? Yes exactly I rebuild the propellor on my jessie machines. > I suggest that you install the /usr/bin/propellor wrapper from the > jessie repos, and then use a more recent ~/.propellor. E.g.: >cd ~/.propellor >git

Bug#834895: fatal: refusing to merge unrelated histories

2016-08-20 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> It means you need git 2.9 on the system you run `propellor --spin`, but > it shouldn't break anything on the host you are trying to configure. Yes, but usually, I prepare my configuration on the targetted machine. (a jessie machine) So if I can not run propello on jessie I will be really sad

Bug#834895: fatal: refusing to merge unrelated histories

2016-08-20 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Sean diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 9194b6c..21a524d 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, libghc-stm-dev, libghc-text-dev, libghc-concurrent-output-dev, - git, +

Bug#826522: Set the plugin directory

2016-06-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
what about the serial / openmp etc.. version of the plugings ?

Bug#826522: Set the plugin directory

2016-06-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> I've juste uploaded release 1.10.0-patch1+docs-1~exp3 to experimental, > configured with: > --with-default-plugindir=/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/hdf5/plugins Just for information do we have this plugin directory available in the pkg-config file in order to setup the plugging directory for

Bug#827273: RFS: python-vispy/0.4.0-1 [ITP]

2016-06-14 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
done thanks a lot for this package ;) Fred De : Ghislain Vaillant [ghisv...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 14 juin 2016 16:13 À : Debian Bug Tracking System Objet : Bug#827273: RFS: python-vispy/0.4.0-1 [ITP] Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist

Bug#819514: RFS: emacs-buttercup/1.5-1 -- behaviour-driven testing for Emacs Lisp packages

2016-03-30 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
uploaded Cheers Fred

Bug#816266: python-qtawesome/0.3.2-1 [ITP]

2016-03-23 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Ghislain. I see only one problem you did not repackage the source with a +dfsg in order to remove the font files. If you let the files inside the source package you need to add the copyright information of these files. the best is to repackge using the Files-Excludes in the copyright

Bug#817871: Acknowledgement (haskell-mode: Could you package the latest version 13.18)

2016-03-13 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
In fact I would change the title :) for indentation problem with I do not know if the new version solve this problem. Fred

Bug#817871: Acknowledgement (haskell-mode: Could you package the latest version 13.18)

2016-03-13 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, Here a test.hs file which show starnge behaviour when using the tab key Go to the open [ and hit tab before packages :: [Package] packages = [ -- hardware "firmware-linux-nonfree" ] after packages :: [Package] packag[ -- hardware

Bug#816266: RE:Bug#816266: RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.0-1 [ITP]

2016-03-12 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> I don't know enough about the python-qtawesome package to tell whether > python-xstatic-font-awesome is equivalent functionality-wise. Me too :) > I don't expect it to be an easy pitch to ask the Spyder team to > rethink their dependency chain just for the sake of re-usability. > Unless you

Bug#816266: RE:Bug#816266: RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.0-1 [ITP]

2016-03-11 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Ghislain, I am wondering it this python-qtawesome package should not be replace by the already available one [1] python-xstatic-font-awesome. It would be great if we could convince the spyder upstream to use the python-xstatic system instead of embeding third party solutions. Cheers

Bug#816266: RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.0-1 [ITP]

2016-02-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> The Spyder Development Team is not upstream of this font actually. So I > don't think creating a font package from this source package is the > right solution, is it? No you are right I looked at the elusive content /tmp$ unzip elusive-icons-2.0.0.zip Archive: elusive-icons-2.0.0.zip

Bug#816266: RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.0-1 [ITP]

2016-02-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Ghislain >* The -common package contains 2 fonts, one of which is not available > for Debian (elusive-iconfont, SIL OFL 1.1). The other one (fontawesome) > is symlinked from its corresponding package. in that case can you create a real fonts package in order to be consistant with all

Bug#816099: RFS: python-qtpy/1.0~b1-1 [ITP]

2016-02-27 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
uploaded. thanks a lot Fred

Bug#814660: RFS: propellor/2.15.4-1 -- property-based host configuration management in haskell

2016-02-13 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Done :) thanks for your work. Fred

Bug#813523: RFS: h5py/2.6.0-1

2016-02-03 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Uploaded thanks for your work Frederic

Bug#812491: RFS: h5py/2.5.0-2

2016-01-24 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Thanks to Picca Frederic-Emmanuel (Closes: #793789) * d/control: cme fix, wrap and sort, update descriptions. * Add examples to doc package. * Move documentation generation to arch-indep targets. * Add autopkgtest testsuite. * Simplify clean target. Best regards, Ghislain Vaillant

Bug#811339: spyder: major feature broken: ipython console doesn't work

2016-01-18 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I know that the current state of the spyder stack is quite unstable :(( Can you test this with the version available into unstable 2.3.8. And gives me your feedback. The problem is that spyder > 2.3.5 changed by default the PyQt API#1 -> #2 and it broke a bunch of dependencies. This is

Bug#810870: RFS: propellor/2.15.3-1 -- property-based host configuration management in haskell

2016-01-13 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
uploaded. thanks for your work :) De : Sean Whitton [spwhit...@spwhitton.name] Envoyé : mercredi 13 janvier 2016 04:19 À : sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#810870: RFS: propellor/2.15.3-1 -- property-based host configuration management in haskell

Bug#810870: RFS: propellor/2.15.3-1 -- property-based host configuration management in haskell

2016-01-13 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
accepted :)

Bug#809826: RFS: propellor/2.15.2-1 -- property-based host configuration management in haskell

2016-01-04 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
done :) Thanks Fred De : Sean Whitton [spwhit...@spwhitton.name] Envoyé : lundi 4 janvier 2016 13:58 À : sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#809826: RFS: propellor/2.15.2-1 -- property-based host configuration management in haskell Package:

Bug#809747: RFS: propellor/2.15.1-1 -- property-based host configuration management in haskell

2016-01-03 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
done. thanks for your contribution :)) De : Sean Whitton [spwhit...@spwhitton.name] Envoyé : dimanche 3 janvier 2016 18:28 À : sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#809747: RFS: propellor/2.15.1-1 -- property-based host configuration management in haskell

Bug#804358: Install issue with x86_64?

2015-11-07 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello I do not know why this break, but nevertheless, I will reassign to libstdc++in order to understand what is going on * libstdc++6:i386 breaks python-guiqwt (<=2.3.1-1) Please gcc guyes, can you tell me if a binNMU would be enought to solve this problem. Cheers Frederic

Bug#803631: spyder FTBFS due to missing build dependencies

2015-11-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
thanks for the pacth :) BUT python3-qt4 -> python3-pyqt4 I will upload spyder 2.3.7 today. Thanks Fred

Bug#801141: RE:[buildd-tools-devel] Bug#801141: sbuild: Failed to lock chroot: /var/lib/sbuild/unstable-i386.tar.gz: File is not owned by user root

2015-10-08 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> The error message you saw: > E: unstable-i386-sbuild-22146117-8358-467e-a857-9e8d4c79e747: Failed to lock > chroot: /var/lib/sbuild/unstable-i386.tar.gz: File is not owned by user root > does not come from sbuild but from schroot. So if you want to know why schroot > needs it to be owned by

Bug#801141: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#801141: sbuild: Failed to lock chroot: /var/lib/sbuild/unstable-i386.tar.gz: File is not owned by user root

2015-10-07 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> I guess you used the instructions from this wiki page: > https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild Yes I did but I created a propellor property in order o maintain my sbuild chroot. Indeed this is a detail. So I end up with a tar.gz owned by root:root Then comes the upgrade whcih changed the owner into

Bug#799886: Leaving it for Frederic as well? (RFS: arrayfire/3.1.1+dfsg1-2)

2015-09-24 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I am on it. Cheers

Bug#799655: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.1+dfsg1-1

2015-09-22 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
I will take care of this. Cheers

Bug#799655: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.1+dfsg1-1

2015-09-22 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
It is in the pipe :) Cheers

Bug#799595: RFS: clblas/2.6-3

2015-09-21 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
done :) Thanks Fred

Bug#799195: python-scientific: FTBFS during rebuild against netcdf 4.4.0

2015-09-16 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
python-scientific is for now not compatible with numpy 1.9.

Bug#797284: Info received (Bug#797284: Info received (Bug#797284: pytango ftbfs in unstable))

2015-09-13 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Here also a discussion about the problem on the gcc mailing list https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2015-09/msg00057.html It seems that a abi_tag attribut should be added in tango to the problematic symbols in order to help gcc5 decide which ABI is expected. ifdef _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI define

Bug#797284: Info received (Bug#797284: pytango ftbfs in unstable)

2015-09-07 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
I started a thread about this on debian-python mailing list. https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2015/09/msg00028.html

Bug#797284: pytango ftbfs in unstable

2015-09-06 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
ok, so the missing symbols comes from attribute.o and wattribute.o

Bug#797284: Info received (Bug#797284: pytango ftbfs in unstable)

2015-09-06 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
:/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu$ nm -D libtango.so.8.1.2 | grep ranges_type | c++filt 0045f258 D Tango::ranges_type2const::enu 00460dfc B Tango::ranges_type2const::str[abi:cxx11] 0045f280 D Tango::ranges_type2const::enu 00460fdc B Tango::ranges_type2const::str[abi:cxx11] 0045f27c D

Bug#797284: pytango ftbfs in unstable

2015-09-04 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Ok, with the new tango,I get another symbols problem ImportError: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/lib.linux-i686-2.7/PyTango/_PyTango.so: undefined symbol: _ZN5Tango17ranges_type2constIsE3strE Tango::ranges_type2const::str so once again a problem with a string ???

Bug#797284: pytango ftbfs in unstable

2015-09-02 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
ok, I just uploaded a tango package which fix the FTBFS with gcc5. I also made a libstdc++6 transition for tango. so now I think that after tango acceptation into unstable a simple binNMU should fix this issue.

Bug#797284: pytango ftbfs in unstable

2015-08-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
ok, when I unmangle the symbol, I get this c++filt _ZN5Tango11DeviceProxy14get_corba_nameB5cxx11Eb Tango::DeviceProxy::get_corba_name[abi:cxx11](bool) so it seems that this FTBFS is about a cxx11 ABi change. during this build the c++ code compile in pytango (boost python)is noo more

Bug#797285: tango ftbfs in unstable

2015-08-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Doko, libtool: link: g++ -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -std=c++11 -D_REENTRANT -DOMNI_UNLOADABLE_STUBS -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -o .libs/notifd2db notifd2db.o -L../../lib/cpp/server /scratch/packages/tmp/tango-8.1.2c+dfsg/build/lib/cpp/server/.libs/libtango.so

Bug#797284: pytango ftbfs in unstable

2015-08-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
I am working on it with the upstream. once fixed,I will upload a tango with the v5 extension. then I will ask for a transition right ?

Bug#797284: pytango ftbfs in unstable

2015-08-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
any libstdc++6 follow-up transition is waived. you can just upload to unstable. ok, I will try to fix this issue next week. thanks

Bug#796079: RFS: clfft/2.6.1-2

2015-08-19 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
I'll take care of this one then I need to leave so if you come with clblas after do not hesitate to ask Andreas. Cheers Fred De : Ghislain Vaillant [ghisv...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mercredi 19 août 2015 11:15 À : sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#796079:

Bug#796043: RFS: clblas/2.6-2

2015-08-18 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
done. De : Ghislain Vaillant [ghisv...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 18 août 2015 21:44 À : sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#796043: RFS: clblas/2.6-2 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package

Bug#796041: RFS: clfft/2.6.1-1

2015-08-18 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Ghislain, I get this error when building with sbuild (unstable) [ 62%] Building CXX object library/CMakeFiles/clFFT.dir/fft_binary_lookup.cpp.o cd /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-i586-linux-gnu/library /usr/bin/c++ -DCLFFT_EXPORTS -DclFFT_EXPORTS -pthread -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat

Bug#794007: haskell-hmatrix: add the gsl binding

2015-08-17 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
@picca, are you a user of the hmatrix package, or did you report the bug for other reasons? Hello, I am using the gsl binding for my hkl project. I use haskell in order to prototype my code then I do the implementation in C (because for my job, I need to provide a C library which compile with a

Bug#794086: RFS: clblas/2.4-3

2015-07-31 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
idem 2.6 is out and can you fix most of the lintian warnings :) Cheers. Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#794089: RFS: clfft/2.4-4

2015-07-31 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, sorry but I am in VAC until mid August. can you find another sponsor or wait until I come back from holidays ? the 2.6 version is also available :p Cheers Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#793078: RFS: arrayfire/3.0.2-1

2015-07-21 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
done De : Ghislain Vaillant [ghisv...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 21 juillet 2015 08:54 À : sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#793078: RFS: arrayfire/3.0.2-1 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the

Bug#792431: cme: do not extract the copyright informations of the autoconf tools

2015-07-18 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
$ licensecheck -r -m --copyright config config/texinfo.tex GPL (v3 or later) 1985, 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 config/ltmain.shGPL (v2 or later) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Yes this is the problem, a very difficult

Bug#792433: dgit sbuild should not failed without build-deps

2015-07-15 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
dgit -wg sbuild Yes it works. Thanks Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#792433: dgit sbuild should not failed without build-deps

2015-07-15 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
:~/Debian/clfft/clfft$ LANG=C dgit -D sbuild --clean=git + git diff --quiet HEAD + dpkg-buildpackage '-i'\\'.git/' -I.git -d -T clean dpkg-buildpackage: source package clfft dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.4-3 dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution unstable dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by

Bug#792433: dgit sbuild should not failed without build-deps

2015-07-15 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
ok Here what I did :~/Debian/clfft/clfft$ LANG=C dgit sbuild --clean=git dpkg-buildpackage: source package clfft dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.4-3 dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution unstable dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Ghislain Antony Vaillant ghisv...@gmail.com

Bug#792028: RFS: clfft/2.4-3

2015-07-10 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
FFTW is required for the test suite to run. However, their GTest detection is flawed which makes the test suite not runnable. To fix this would require heavy patching. I'd rather talk with upstream first and ask them to provide more freedom with regards to GTest handling. Does it sound ok to

Bug#792028: RFS: clfft/2.4-3

2015-07-10 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Gislain, I will upload the package ;) During the build I saw this -- Could NOT find FFTW (missing: FFTW_LIBRARIES FFTW_INCLUDE_DIRS) -- FindFFTW looked for single precision libraries named: fftw3f or libfftw3f-3 -- FindFFTW looked for double precision libraries named: fftw3 or

Bug#792028: RFS: clfft/2.4-3

2015-07-10 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Done -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#768634: ITA: propellor -- property-based host configuration management in haskell

2015-07-10 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, just to know if you are planning to update propellor in Debian Cheers Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#791912: RFS: clfft/2.4-2

2015-07-09 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
uploaded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#790895: RFS: h5py/2.5.0-1

2015-07-02 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
uploaded Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#790771: why closed ?

2015-07-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
look at the title ;) RFS for the 2.4-1 version :) no worry upload to mentors en I will take care of the sponsoring. Cheers Fred #790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-2 -- OpenCL BLAS library

2015-07-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Ghislain, please upload to mentors then I will upload :) wrong url in the next message ;) De : Ghislain Vaillant [ghisv...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mercredi 1 juillet 2015 18:09 À : sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-2 -- OpenCL

Bug#788217: RFS: clfft/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#783084] -- OpenCL FFT library

2015-06-18 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, upload but I have a few remarks. here the rules file # see EXAMPLES in dpkg-buildflags(1) and read /usr/share/dpkg/* DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1 include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk why is it necessary to export the symbols since you are using compat level 9 ? %: dh $@

Bug#788217: RFS: clfft/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#783084] -- OpenCL FFT library

2015-06-18 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
I have updated both clBLAS and clFFT with a patch that suppresses the offending flags. You can build the most recent version of the package from the d-science repositories with: gbp buildpackage --git-upstream-tag=v2.4 --git-upstream-branch=master \ --git-debian-branch=debian/sid

Bug#788217: RFS: clfft/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#783084] -- OpenCL FFT library

2015-06-17 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Ghislain, I am trying to build your package with sbuild and I got htis error message. make[3]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-i586-linux-gnu' /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-i586-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles 4 [ 8%] Building CXX object

Bug#788214: RFS: clblas/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#786505] -- OpenCL BLAS library

2015-06-17 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I go thtese lintian errors lintian ─── E: clblas source: missing-build-dependency dpkg-dev (= 1.16.1~) N: N:The package doesn't specify a build dependency on a package that is used N:in debian/rules. N: N:lintian intentionally does not take into account transitive N:

Bug#788217: RFS: clfft/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#783084] -- OpenCL FFT library

2015-06-17 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Ghislain, It seems to me thaht I already saw this problem with Jerome... I built my package on a 32bit system. cd /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-i586-linux-gnu/library /usr/bin/c++ -DCLFFT_EXPORTS -DclFFT_EXPORTS -m64 -pthread -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security

Bug#788214: RFS: clblas/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#786505] -- OpenCL BLAS library

2015-06-17 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hi Fred, Thanks for checking my package out. Sorry for the noise I realize thaht I ran lintian on my wheezy machine This is why I have theses messages. I'll send a patch upstream, but I don't think it is worth adding a patch to the packaging for such a harmless issue. quality ;) So

Bug#788217: RFS: clfft/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#783084] -- OpenCL FFT library

2015-06-17 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
2015-06-17 10:25 GMT+01:00 PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.frmailto:frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr: Hello Ghislain, It seems to me thaht I already saw this problem with Jerome... I built my package on a 32bit system. cd /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj

Bug#788217: RFS: clfft/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#783084] -- OpenCL FFT library

2015-06-17 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
I checked it out and both clBLAS and clFFT actually suffer from the same problem. It seems upstream is rolling its own multiarch detection / selection mechanism. The detection is based on the result of CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P, and the selection can be overriden via a cmake option. obviously it

Bug#768524:

2015-05-03 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, now that Jessie is out, is it possible for yu to upload the 2.x version. thanks a lot for your efforts Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#782586: RFS: h5py/2.4.0+dfsg1-1~exp2 -- general-purpose Python interface to hdf5

2015-04-14 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I can not sponsor your package, my computer can not boot anymore... I will try to solve the problem... Cheers Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#781381: Does not build

2015-03-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Frederic, it seems you have a sponsoring look as well - so I'll stay in fall-back mode. Just ping me if I should do the final sponsoring upload. No problem Andreas, I will tell you. Except that today I will be mostly off (- music :) until this evening cheers Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#781381: Does not build

2015-03-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Andreas, It seems that you do not have numpy installed on your machine. can you try after apt-get install python-numpy python3-numpy cheers fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#778417: ITP: netcdf-python -- python interface to the netCDF4 (network Common Data Form) library

2015-02-18 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I am the maintainer of python-scientific How does this differ from the existing python-netcdf package? I CC the upstream autor of python-scientific, maybe he can clarify this point but before a question to the netcdf4-python guyes. Does netcdf4-python will support python3 ? @Konrad do

Bug#674610:

2015-01-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I did an update of the patch for the 5.1.118-1~dfsg-2 version do you mind if I do an NMU with the attached patch targetting experimental ? - multiarch - no more static and .la files - modernize the rules file Cheers FredericFrom 83c45f71c2c876c5641e495c3da141236fc94485 Mon Sep 17

Bug#674610:

2015-01-29 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Why is it such important? This is juste that I try to install one of my package libtango8:i386 and libtango8:amd64 on one machine I have some troubles because libpgm and omniorb-dfsg were not multi archied. - multiarch This is OK. - no more static and .la files Why do you disable these?

Bug#774374: yesod website cabal template does not work with the yesod dependencies

2015-01-02 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, yes, that would be desirable, and we have an autopkgtest for that: http://ci.debian.net/packages/h/haskell-yesod-bin/ but that did not prevent breakage, partly becaues autopkgtest failures are far to easy to miss. It could not be missed; if this test was run during the build process.

Bug#767074: unblock: taurus/3.3.1+dfsg-1

2014-11-21 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hi Frederic, Please provide a filtered (source) debdiff of the changes, so we can review them. No problem here the full debdiff. debdiff taurus_3.3.0+dfsg-2.dsc taurus_3.3.1+dfsg-1.dsc debdiff Cheers Fred debdiff Description: debdiff

Bug#767074: unblock: taurus/3.3.1+dfsg-1

2014-11-15 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, Here the answer of the taurus upstream (he forgot to CC the the bts) Carlos Pascual [cpasc...@cells.es] Hi Fred and Jonathan, First of all, sorry for the late reply (I hope it is still relevant). I am currently out of office and with limited email access. If you require further info,

Bug#767074: unblock: taurus/3.3.1+dfsg-1

2014-11-15 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
so here the question That's where you come in. You're the maintainer and the expert in this package. Are 251 and 221 that common and important that the other changes are worth less testing than usual? Yes I know about the package, I trust also the upstream when they did that they did all the

Bug#766970: python-scoop: Provide the Python 3 package

2014-11-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, since we are close to the freeze and because your package add a new binary package it will requiered to pass the new queue. So it will no be possible to have python3 package for scoop into jessie. nevertheless I propose to upload it targetting the experimental distribution and reseve

Bug#767074: unblock: taurus/3.3.1+dfsg-1

2014-10-28 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
thanks for the review So, please point to the relevant bug reports closed by 3.3.1, that might help convincing the release team that accepting this last-minute upstream release is worth it. Thanks! here the information from the mailing list

Bug#767074: unblock: taurus/3.3.1+dfsg-1

2014-10-28 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
ok, so here all the link * sardana ** features + http://sourceforge.net/p/sardana/tickets/231/ + http://sourceforge.net/p/sardana/tickets/250/ ** bugs +http://sourceforge.net/p/sardana/tickets/251/ (fix a crash) the dscan things has no bug report but is something important for the final

Bug#765991: RFS: spyder/2.3.1+dfsg-1 -- Python development environment specially suited for scientific computing

2014-10-20 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Done Cheers Frédéric thanks for your work -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#765963: spyder3: new upstream release (2.3.1)

2014-10-19 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
I also took the liberty to bump the standards version and fix some of the lintian pedentic errors. I am happy to share my changes with you guys if you're interested Hello, are you part of the debian-sceince team ? if yes you can push your changes to the repository. If not, just give me the

Bug#765963: spyder3: new upstream release (2.3.1)

2014-10-19 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Yes, I am part of the DST. I did not know it was so straightforward. This is the principle of team maintenance :) What should i do regarding the changelog though ? put your name in the changelog Do i make it as spyder (2.3.1+dfsg-1) with distribution set to UNRELEASED and file an RFS ?

Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library

2014-09-08 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, during the build, I have this message writing output... [ 50%] examples WARNING: LaTeX command 'latex' cannot be run (needed for math display), check the pngmath_latex setting writing output... [ 66%] index maybe it would be nice to install latex to generate the pngmath pictures.

Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library

2014-09-04 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello what about _static/copybutton.js ? Can't find anything special on this (among other packages only to be found in python{2.7,3.2}-doc [1]), so I suggest we just leave it out (contains no copyright info, whatsoever) look at here and add the same thing in the copyright file.

Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library

2014-09-03 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, here a quick review of all the patches * dropped docs package (REJECT-FAQ: split this only if it's big) I think that this patch should be reverted. The problem if you add the documentation in python-scoop seems to me problematic when python3-scoop will come. It is best to my opinion

Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library

2014-09-03 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
scoop-doc would be. But I would be tending to python-scoop-doc anyway. scoop-doc is better to my opinion I just looked at sphinx and it seems that this is better to use source-doc (it is neutral By-the-way: what's your opinion for the dep of the docs package on the main package, Suggests or

Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library

2014-09-03 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
copyright review I used licensecheck as a starting point can you look with the upstream to add copyright headers where it is missing UNKOWN and it would be nice to have also the copyright in each header. it seems thaht there is only the license without the copyright statement. this is not a

Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library

2014-09-03 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
You removed the local-options (are you using gbp-buildpackage to build scoop ?) Yes. What's this for, useful to keep? In fact I like when the master branch does not touch the upstream sources. This is why I use the unapply patches option this way I have the original sources in the master

Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library

2014-09-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I already started to package it, but I did not intend to maintain it. I can sponsorize the upload if you need a sponsor. Did you considede maintaining it under the debian-science umbrella. I know that it is related to deap, so it is science related :). Here the debian-science git

Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library

2014-09-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
sorry, here the right adress git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/scoop.git -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#743508: how to deal with a missed so bump already uploaded ?

2014-05-17 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Reverse dependencies are anything but unrelated. Hello julien, from the point of view of the release team. What should be do now ? to my opinion, all we have to do is to upload zeromq3 with this ugly but necessary +really versionnumber 4.0.3+really-3.2.4-1 then the problem should be fixed

<    1   2   3   4   >