Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes:
> Alef Farah <afa...@inf.ufrgs.br> writes:
>
>> Emacs closes abruptly and displays a "Segmentation fault" error:
>
> Did you happen to (or could you) test in a console emacs i.e. from
> "emacs -nw&q
e this is a transient content issue, it might also be helpful
if you could attach an out.html that causes the crash.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
e
"$@"
instead of
sh -c "$COMMAND"
but then realized that maybe the intention was for the (single) command
string to be parsed by sh. i.e.
run-with-lockfile somelock "apache -d \"some dir\" -f \"some file.conf\""
and not anything like
run
ight poke at it again later.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
#1011477)
which I assume entered Debian as 1.09-6.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
rrupt data)')
+sys.exit(1)
+
git.check_repo_or_die()
top = vfs.RefList(None)
In any case, a 0.27.1 release should fix this *soon*.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03
Package: stterm
Version: 0.5+20140606+gitc2fd275-1
Severity: wishlist
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
estart Emacs, then *both* regular Delete and numpad Delete start to
> delete backward (like Backspace) and k says: ‘DEL
> (translated from )...’.
What does xev say those keys generate after the change?
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9
[If possible, please preserve the 816123-forwarded CC in any replies.]
Since the content of guile-procedures.txt can vary, perhaps it shouldn't
be in schemelib_DATA.
cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816123
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG
A clean solution (according to my tests with dak rm) would be
>
> remove guile-1.8/1.8.8+1-10 lilypond/2.18.2-4.1 denemo/2.0.0-0.1
> songwrite/0.14-10 frescobaldi/2.18.1+ds1-3
I just fixed trackballs, but we're still waiting on at least lilypond.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultv
commits in
the (unnamed) branch that's merged in to sid. If it's useful, I'd also
be happy to send you a patch series (suitable for "git am").
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-
Package: spice-client
Version: 0.12.5-1.2
...or something similar, so that the password isn't plainly visible via
"ps aux", etc., and perhaps wishlist, though IMO somewhat important.
See also: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809631
Thanks
--
Rob Br
to handle this for vnc a while back, but I can't recall if I
finished them. In any case, don't let that hold up any other work on a
fix.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39
ibisc-export95 libnettle6 libnfnetlink0 libp11-kit0 libpsl0 librtas1
librtasevent1 libtasn1-6
I: Checking component main on http://http.debian.net/debian...
E: Couldn't find these debs: linux-image-ppc64el
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C
Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes:
> Package: vmdebootstrap
> Version: Version: 1.3-1
>
> It looks like the actual kernel name is linux-image-ppc64le, not
> "linux-image-ppc64el, i.e. the arch and kernel package have reversed
> suffixes.
It's actually &q
Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes:
With the powerpc64le patch, it fails like this:
# vmdebootstrap --image vm.img --size 2g --log log --verbose \
--customize=/root/tmp-vm/setup --distribution sid \
--size 8g --arch ppc64el \
--foreign /usr/bin/qemu-ppc64le-
eed, before I spend more time on the code.
I've nearly finished hacking up a first pass, but it's not likely to be
quite ready yet.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
(system "uname -m >/tmp/QobiScheme.tmp")
> ...
> (system "rm -f /tmp/QobiScheme.tmp"))
Thanks - working on an update.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
a
chance to get back to it yet.
(I don't have a pointer handy, but iirc, it looked like there might an
upstream patch that we may be able to cherry-pick to fix the problem.)
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
d to the Info-directory-list.
The main change is the use of update-alternatives which should make the
Debian info arrangement look substantially less unusual. (This approach
does depend on update-alternatives handling sets reasonably whose
--slave link sets differ - which I need to double-check.)
emacs24 package). Until some known GTK+
problems are fixed, this version may help avoid crashing Emacs during
an emacsclient disconnect. See
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567934 and
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85715 for more information.
Thanks
--
R
Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes:
> It looks like it's dh_strip_nondeterminism that's changing the timestamp
> on the .el.gz file, and hence making emacs think that the source file is
> newer than the byte-compiled file.
>
> I suspect it may make sense to have
file is
newer than the byte-compiled file.
I suspect it may make sense to have some way to get strip-nondeterminism
to preserve them, so I'm assigning a clone of this bug there.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9
1
> […]
We suspect this is a bug in elpa-magit -- it may just need to be rebuilt
via dh-epla 0.16, but if that turns out to be incorrect, please feel
free to reassign the bug back to emacs24.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8
reassign it to emacs24 if I turn out to be mistaken.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
Right - I'll take a look at improvements for possibly the upload after
next (probably won't make it in the next one).
Thanks for the suggestions.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
Norbert Preining <prein...@logic.at> writes:
> Could you please ship two different .desktop files if possible?
Certainly - I'll try to straighten this out in the next upload.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676
> Can this be cherry picked for Debian's emacs24?
Should be in the next upload.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
with emacs24-lucid and font "fixed" (i.e. 6x13).
Do you see it with "emacs --font 6x13"?
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
nal information here: https://bugs.debian.org/798817
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
Martin Račák <ra...@riseup.net> writes:
> I was looking for a newcomer bug I could fix and learn how it's done in
> Debian in the process, so here is a patch.
Thanks. Scheduled for the next upload.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA
nal handler.
This appears to still be the case with at least Debian's 2.0.11+1-10
package, and setting the handler to something that doesn't perform IO
has the same effect (i.e. no alarm until you hit return):
(sigaction SIGALRM (lambda (x) (exit 1)))
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.o
hough to try that myself), and I can upload a
new package soon.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes:
> You mean -O0, perhaps?
Actually, there may be a mistake in the current rules file which is
causing it to always build without an -O flag...
Changing the rules to work correctly (to use -O2 as you mentioned)
appears to fix the problem,
to gcc-5 and set the severity to
important.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
fixed:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764532
For reference, I'm running a build on harris.debian.org (armhf) which
has already made it past the invocation that failed.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676
tracker system
acknowledging my email, other than leaving it off the reply list?
Hmm, not sure offhand, I just ignore it, but I wouldn't mind turning it
off myself.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG
. For example, in the GCC world it's certainly reasonable to
expect that you might need to work with both 4.9 and 5.0, or with 2.7
and 3.4 in the Python world, etc.
FWIW, if I'm reading it right, it looks like the Debian GCC 5 info pages
may be using gcc-5 and gccint-5 style refs.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
documentation they're interested in from both Emacs
and the standalone reader.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
emacs25.info
...
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
this to
metadata.py in _apply_linux_attr_rec():
else:
print sys.stderr, 'bad chattr', repr((path,
self.linux_attr))
raise
And then re-run the restore so we can see the linux_attr value when it
fails.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org
, then that may provide a simpler solution.
Hope this helps.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
around this
issue) please let me know.
I wonder if adding this to the restore might provide a workaround for
now:
--exclude-rx '^/redacted/#\.fetchmailrc#$'
Or perhaps:
--exclude-rx '^redacted/#\.fetchmailrc#$'
Not sure which one is correct offhand.
Hope this helps
--
Rob Browning
rlb
Package: siege
Version: 3.0.8-1
Forwarded: Jeffrey Fulmer j...@joedog.org
Fix a potential segfault in url_set_postdata by including a byte for
the null terminator when allocating the result, and switch to xmalloc
to catch allocation failures.
---
The psuedo-headers above are just for the
call is the one most directly related to the
error you encountered, so the output of that would still be interesting.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8
with the newer versions of guile, though.]
For the record, I'm fine with letting 1.8 stay for now. I imagine Don
and I can handle any serious problems, and hopefully we won't need it
too much longer.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8
with -Q? If not, then the problem is
likely due to an additional packaage you have installed, or something in
your ~/.emacs, and you should be able to track it down by selectively
disabling things until you find the culprit.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011
: 767949)
* Add Breaks: apel ( 10.8+0.20120427-4) to emacs24-common to fix
a byte-compilation problem with older versions of the package.
Thanks to Łukasz Stelmach for the report and Sébastien Villemot
for tracking down the correct version. (Closes: 775564)
-- Rob Browning
)
-- Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org Sat, 07 Mar 2015 13:25:57 -0600
Thanks again for the help.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
to reassign it yourself, or I'll try to get to it
later this weekend.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
it), then that file's supposed to be there. In any case, it's
not an emacs package file.
Hope this helps
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E
) [1].
Ahh, OK, I thought we needed prior approval before uploads to unstable
now.
Are you happy with the upload? Would you like to ask for prior approval first?
I'll hopefully have time to look at it this weekend.
Thanks again
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011
Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu writes:
It turned out to be an Emacs bug already fixed upstream.
Please see the attached NMU diff which fixes.
I'm uploading the fixed package to DELAYED/10 today.
Did you get approval from the release team?
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org
David, Erwan eda...@nds.com writes:
I got the dbg package, here is the stack trace when starting emacs24
And was that with 24.4? If not, is there any chance you could try 24.4
(which we're preparing for the upcoming stable release, i.e. jessie)?
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org
think that's can be ignored for now.
Testing with 50develock-el.el in my system's emacs/site-start.d/ I am no
longer able to reproduce the reported behaviour. Good!
Looks like develock-el needs an update.
OK, reassigning to develock-el for consideration there.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb
can pursue it much further.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
-typing the code.
Should I be doing something else to reproduce the problem?
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
reproduce the problem.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
'develock)
And I suppose you might also need to temporarily remove the Debian
develock-el package.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes:
Looks like the latest version of develock might be 0.45. Would it be
easy for you to test that? I'm wondering if this might be a develock
issue that's been fixed upstream.
And I'm not positive, but it looks like it might be hosted here now:
http
libxrandr2 2:1.4.2-1+b1
ii libxrender11:0.9.8-1+b1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2
emacs24 recommends no packages.
Versions of packages emacs24 suggests:
ii emacs24-common-non-dfsg 24.4+1-2
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG
--listfiles emacs24-el | fgrep .el | xargs zfgrep export-as-ascii
...
/usr/share/emacs/24.4/lisp/org/ox-ascii.el.gz:(defun org-ascii-export-as-ascii
If so, suppose you might need a (require 'ox-ascii) if it's not already
available.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG
Aha?
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18813
I've only had a chance to skim, but perhaps that's it.
Are you running emacs-nox by any chance? If so, it sounded like
switching to emacs24-lucid might be a possible workaround, until we get
this fixed in emacs24.
--
Rob Browning
rlb
Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes:
Aha?
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18813
I've only had a chance to skim, but perhaps that's it.
Are you running emacs-nox by any chance? If so, it sounded like
switching to emacs24-lucid might be a possible workaround, until we
in preference to cl-macroexpand-all.
The latter is a deprecated alias to the former (in cl). i.e. from
/usr/share/emacs/24.4/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl.el.gz:
(define-obsolete-function-alias 'cl-macroexpand-all 'macroexpand-all 24.3)
Hope this helps.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
combinations:
* emacs -f gnus
* emacs -Q -f gnus
with either ‘emacs24’ or ‘emacs24-nox’ installed.
Can you set debug-on-error to t and try again, so we can (hopefully) get
a bit more information?
i.e. via either (setq debug-on-error t) in your .emacs or M-x
set-variable.
Thanks
--
Rob
emacs. Then,
assuming that's OK, run M-x set-variable to change debug-on-error to t.
And finally, run M-x gnus.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
* The Gnus startup exits, with the error
“Cannot open load file: no such file or directory, debug”.
Hmm -- no backtrace?
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B
crossed my mind -- do you happen to have the gnus deb
installed? If so, I wonder if that might be relevant (though it may not
be active for emacs24).
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11
that have Guile 2.0 support upstream, but not in Debian.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
, and then migrate in tandem with the new
g-wrap.
Hence my feeling that we need active maintainers for whichever of these
are to remain in Debian. I might considering helping with that
eventually, but probably not in the short term.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10
(or the mailing list). That might be the fastest
place to start.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
severity 726593 serious
thanks
We've removed emacs24 from unstable, and we're trying to remove it from
jessie. This package should probably be upgraded now or removed from
jessie too.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676
would be to patch css-mode, another would be to just remove
css-mode (and html-helper-mode (last updated upstream in 2004) if it
doesn't work with Emacs' built-in css-mode).
Thoughts?
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0
version of the same code, then it might make sense to
rework the css-mode package to ignore emacs24 ( 24.4+1) or similar.
Otherwise, if css-mode is still appropriate, then perhaps this is
relevant:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20135194/emacs-css-mode-not-loading
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb
Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes:
I'm not sure how it compares, but 24.4 has its own css-mode.el. If
that's a newer version of the same code, then it might make sense to
[ 3 more citation lines. Click/Enter to show. ]
rework the css-mode package to ignore emacs24 ( 24.4+1
HTML mode(s?) once again.
...or perhaps html-helper-mode works with 24.4's css-mode? If so then
html-helper-mode can just adjust its dependencies.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03
of having
to change the --help and man pages that would add more translator work.
Sounds good, and thanks.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E
emacs23 installed at the moment). Did you mean for Kurt to send it?
And what kind of test did you have in mind?
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0
--help for program usage information.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
documented behaviour.
Please get rid of all documentation, configurations and examples
that tell you how to set it up using s_client.
I've also seen examples adding -ssl2 and -ssl3 which is really
really broken.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10
Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes:
The following issue was just reported against emacs23 in Debian, and
from a quick glance, it looks like 24.4 still uses s_client, so if this
is a problem, it's perhaps still relevant.
Oh, and the link (for the emacs24 bug cloned from the emacs23 bug
days before the freeze migration deadline, so I
suspect jessie may not be feasible.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
,
mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc
emacs23-nox | 23.4+1-4.1+b1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64,
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel,
powerpc, s390x, sparc
Maintainer: Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org
--- Reason
with the
addition of guile-2.0.
According to dak, freetalk is blocking this removal, has been FTBFS
since 2013-06, and hasn't had a non-NMU since 2012-06.
cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745997
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C
with the
addition of guile-2.0.
According to dak, beast is blocking this removal, and appears to be
unmaintained.
cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745991
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
with the
addition of guile-2.0.
According to dak, anubis is blocking this removal, and the last non-NMU
was in 2009.
cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745989
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B
with the addition of guile-2.0.
According to dak, bobot++ is blocking this removal, and appears to be
unmaintained.
cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731784
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B
with the addition of guile-2.0.
According to dak, guile-pg is blocking this removal, and appears to be
unmaintained.
cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707900
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9
-non-dfsg/non-free
Should be removed iff guile-1.8 is.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
add
(setq frame-resize-pixelwise t)
to your .emacs?
Not that I see (tested with fullboth and maximized).
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8
tracker.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
tags 743910 fixed-upstream
thanks
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?41099#comment2
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
up with
a frame that would hold M-x 80 x x's.
So I wanted to check to see if this was still a problem for you.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0
only searched for makefiles named Makefile; it will not
find a makefile named makefile or GNUmakefile.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377
.
For what it's worth, early next week I'm planning to determine whether
or not guile-1.8 is going to stay in jessie.
I'm still hoping we can remove it, but we'll see. We're down to very
few rdepends.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8
[If possible, please preserve the -forwarded address in any replies.]
This 24.3 crash was reported to Debian:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732029
I thought I'd pass it on for a look, though I'm not sure there's enough
information for diagnosis.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
test a newer emacs24)?
It might also be worth testing after starting up emacs with emacs -Q
to see if any local configurations might be affecting emacs' behavior.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
but with Emacs 23.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699325
Still related to getenv, but in a different context.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592
applications). This works normally
in Emacs 23, so this is a regression.
Is this still a problem?
If so, can you elaborate a bit on your situation? (I'm assuming that
Gnus normally handles this better, or we'd have heard more complaints.)
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG
301 - 400 of 1013 matches
Mail list logo