Bug#352440: Any updates on this bug?

Hi there. Is there any progress on this? Any updates? Thanks for any information, Rogério Brito. -- Rogério Brito : rbr...@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito : http://meusite.mackenzie.com.br/rbrito Projects: algorithms.berlios.de : lame.sf.net :

Bug#299324: Any updates on this bug?

Hi there. Is there any progress on this? Any updates? Thanks for any information, Rogério Brito. -- Rogério Brito : rbr...@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito : http://meusite.mackenzie.com.br/rbrito Projects: algorithms.berlios.de : lame.sf.net :

Bug#484015: xserver-xorg-video-ati: [r128][powerpc] output is limited to 800x600 even with 1024x768 display

times the following error---at least 20 times in a row) (EE) R128(0): FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO: Invalid argument (...) If more information is needed, please let me know. Thanks in advance, Rogerio Brito. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2008/05/msg00055.html [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net

Bug#472755: xinetd: does not start services from /etc/inetd.conf with newest version

Package: xinetd Version: 1:2.3.14-6 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software The package xinetd with revision -6 has a switch intended to support ipv6 services. Unfortunately, it also breaks unrelated software (my SMTP server, for instance, thus the severity), since I get

Bug#364402: libapr0: please move its section to libs, instead of net

Package: libapr0 Version: 2.0.55-4 Severity: wishlist While auditing the installation of my systems, I noticed that libapr0 is packaged under section net. My naïve impression would be that its proper place would be in section libs, instead. I know that changing the section and priority of