Bug#1037244: dhcpcd-ui: new upstream 0.7.9 release

2023-06-22 Thread Roy Marples
Hi Leandro On 21/06/2023 20:37, Leandro Cunha wrote: [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dhcpcd5 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dhcpcd-ui/-/commit/3ca27368227960a2d97ca4fbd1a56314546d96d3 You can probably remove libdbus-1-dev as a buildtime dependency as well. Roy

Bug#881103: openresolv: bump version to 3.9.0 so it works with systemd

2017-11-07 Thread Roy Marples
Package: openresolv Version: 3.8.0-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Please consider bumping openresolv to 3.9.0 so it works with systemd, which is the Debian default init now. The current version fails to restart services, rendering it pretty useless. Thanks Roy -- System Information:

Bug#879208: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#879208: wpasupplicant: Build wpa_supplicant with interface matching support

2017-10-20 Thread Roy Marples
On 20/10/2017 15:20, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Control: notfound -1 2:2.4-1.1 > > On 20 October 2017 at 14:33, Roy Marples <r...@marples.name> wrote: >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> Plese build wpa_supplicant with interface matching support: >> CONFIG_MATCH_IFAC

Bug#879208: wpasupplicant: Build wpa_supplicant with interface matching support

2017-10-20 Thread Roy Marples
Package: wpasupplicant Version: 2:2.4-1.1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Plese build wpa_supplicant with interface matching support: CONFIG_MATCH_IFACE=y This allows the administrator to configure named interfaces to run wpa_supplicant on which may not exist at boot time. This allows USB

Bug#820069: dhcpcd5: configures interface without being asked to

2016-05-09 Thread Roy Marples
dhcpcd does not parse /etc/network/interfaces. I suspect dhcpcd was started by an init script, and the default config is to configure all interfaces. You can restrict this with /etc/dhcpcd.conf. Roy

Bug#821405: dhcpcd no longer starts wpa_supplicant

2016-05-09 Thread Roy Marples
The next release of wpa_supplicant will be able to hotplug itself: https://w1.fi/cgit/hostap/commit/?id=2e997eece5776eca0a99d53893e343539f9f8eb2 So then you can have the same functionality. Roy

Bug#821387: don't say dhcpcd not running if really still running

2016-04-18 Thread Roy Marples
On 18/04/2016 12:23, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: dhcpcd5 > Version: 6.10.1-1 > X-debbugs-CC: r...@marples.name > > man page says: > > -k, --release [interface] > This causes an existing dhcpcd process running on the interface > to release its lease and

Bug#813803: restarting non-existing services leads to error messages and non-zero exit code

2016-02-23 Thread Roy Marples
> NetworkManager[26333]: dns-mgr: Writing DNS information to > /sbin/resolvconf > Failed to try-restart named.service: Unit named.service failed to > load: No such file or directory. > Failed to try-restart unbound.service: Unit unbound.service failed > to load: No such file or directory. >

Bug#799795: Debian 8.2 does not get Default Gateway if DHCP client uses 121 option

2015-10-15 Thread Roy Marples
I would say that dhcpcd is correct and the DHCP server is not correctly configured. Option 121 has to include every route (bar the implied subnet route for the address), including the default route. >From RFC3442 If the DHCP server returns both a Classless Static Routes option and a

Bug#792430: openresolv: Fail if a zone is declared on multiple interfaces.

2015-09-17 Thread Roy Marples
Hi > When a zone is declared on multiple interfaces (not necessarely same > content, but the same name), the configuration generated doesn't work, > two entries are provided and this log indicates the failure at bind restart: > config: error: /var/lib/bind/resolvconf-zones.conf:23: zone >

Bug#792428: openresolv: "Failed to get D-Bus connection" randomly at update and boot on bind9 restart

2015-09-17 Thread Roy Marples
> After an update from any source (dhcp, openvpn, static, ...), restart of > bind fail with message: > Failed to get D-Bus connection: Operation not permitted > > It's not all the time, but very very often. the named (bind) subscriber doesn't use DBus, only the dnsmasq subscriber does. Are you

Bug#792428: openresolv: "Failed to get D-Bus connection" randomly at update and boot on bind9 restart

2015-09-17 Thread Roy Marples
> After an update from any source (dhcp, openvpn, static, ...), restart of > bind fail with message: > Failed to get D-Bus connection: Operation not permitted > > It's not all the time, but very very often. In openresolv, only the dnsmasq subscriber uses DBus. All the named subscriber (bind) in

Bug#761050: Please read Re: openresolv sets local bind to always forward requests, even when local bind is authoritative

2015-09-17 Thread Roy Marples
Sorry aboutt he late response, for some reason this ended up in my spam filter. > On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 12:25:38 +0200 (CEST) >> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto wrote: >> >>> The upstream said: >>> >>> "Not really an openresolv bug as I see it. >>> For example 192.168.x.x can

Bug#770043: Denial of Service in dhcpd5: CVE-2014-6060

2014-11-18 Thread Roy Marples
On 18/11/2014 16:47, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: just in case we hear from Roy I've made this known to quite a few Debian developers - I don't want anything more to do with the Debian project. It takes me more time to look after the Debian package than it does for the other distro's I regularly

Bug#770043: Denial of Service in dhcpd5: CVE-2014-6060

2014-11-18 Thread Roy Marples
Hi Salvatore On 18/11/2014 17:23, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 04:58:39PM +, Roy Marples wrote: On 18/11/2014 16:47, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: just in case we hear from Roy I've made this known to quite a few Debian developers - I don't want anything more to do

Bug#724105: Is package gone from mentors?

2014-10-14 Thread Roy Marples
Hi On 2014-10-14 10:07, Marcin Kulisz wrote: I'm not capable of uploading it but I'd like to have a look into this package. Unfortunately it looks like it's gone from mentors and there is no provided VCS for this package in the PTS. Can you re-upload it or send a link to VCS? BTW pls cc me

Bug#758713: dhcpcd5: Segfault after a possible endless recursion

2014-08-20 Thread Roy Marples
Hi Axel On 2014-08-20 13:48, Axel Beckert wrote: I've just installed dhcpcd5, configured wicd to use it and instructed wicd to renew the connection on eth0 (which used dhclient previously). I had to manually kill running dhclient processes, but dhcpcd got an IP. And then segfaulted after a

Bug#724105: openresolv: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `config.mk'. Stop.

2014-04-30 Thread Roy Marples
Hi I've uploaded openresolv-3.5.7-1 to mentors, which fixes this issue: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openresolv/openresolv_3.5.7-1.dsc If you could put the package into Debian proper I'd appreciate it. Thanks Roy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#724105: openresolv: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `config.mk'. Stop.

2014-04-23 Thread Roy Marples
Hi On 23/04/2014 12:41, Hideki Yamane wrote: I've made a patch for this FTBFS issue, just ignoring config.mk in Makefile and build fine. Please check and consider to apply it. From the dh_auto_clean man page: This is intended to work for about 90% of packages. If it doesn’t work,

Bug#719588: Bug#723967: dhcpcd5: diff for NMU version 6.0.5-1.1

2013-12-04 Thread Roy Marples
Hi On 04/12/2013 13:57, Christoph Egger wrote: Package: dhcpcd5 Version: 6.0.5-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for dhcpcd5 (versioned as 6.0.5-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards.

Bug#724078: dhcpcd-dbus: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `config.mk'. Stop.

2013-11-18 Thread Roy Marples
Hi On 18/11/2013 17:39, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: attached patch should fix this issue. Not uploading for now in case you have other plans for the package. In case you are in search for a sponsor get in touch with me :) I'm ideally looking for someone who can maintain the dhcpcd packages in

Bug#719588: dhcpcd5: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD due to missing include

2013-08-20 Thread Roy Marples
Hi Petr On 13/08/2013 12:11, Petr Salinger wrote: Package: dhcpcd5 Version: 6.0.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD. It needs small tweak, see bellow. Please include this change also as

Bug#637285: openresolv: dns-domain dns-sortlist in the interfaces file is not getting into resolv.conf

2011-08-11 Thread Roy Marples
Hi Alex On 11/08/2011 06:30, Alex Apke wrote: domain is missing because search supersedes it. Any domain entries are silently merged with the search option. Is there a problem with this? From a resolver search standpoint, there is no problem appending the domain entry to search field. But I

Bug#637285: openresolv: dns-domain dns-sortlist in the interfaces file is not getting into resolv.conf

2011-08-11 Thread Roy Marples
On 11/08/2011 09:58, Alex Apke wrote: So that means that having a domain entry listed before search gives the desired behavior, I am looking for. With the original sample I used for opening the ticket, this is the expected layout: # Generated by resolvconf domain example.com search foo bar

Bug#637285: openresolv: dns-domain dns-sortlist in the interfaces file is not getting into resolv.conf

2011-08-11 Thread Roy Marples
On 11/08/2011 17:18, Alex Apke wrote: It looks like the behaviour you really want is the correct domain first in the search list. You can do this by setting interface_order and/or dynamic_order and/or search_domains in /etc/resolvconf.conf Sure, as a backup procedure, there is always that, but

Bug#637285: openresolv: dns-domain dns-sortlist in the interfaces file is not getting into resolv.conf

2011-08-10 Thread Roy Marples
Hi Alex On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 00:15 -0700, Alex Apke wrote: domain sortlist are missing, and the domain value is being appended to search, plus the eth0 eth1 stanza's aren't broken up like in the following URL: http://roy.marples.name/projects/openresolv/wiki/OpenResolvReasons domain is

Bug#635479: openresolv: Feature request: DHCPv6 support in DHCP hook script

2011-07-27 Thread Roy Marples
Hi Geoff On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 00:12 -0700, Geoffrey Sisson wrote: This patch adds basic DHCPv6 support for openresolv. It's unlikely that this is a comlete patch. For example, some applications might resonably expect resolvconf -d eth0 to remove both the IPv4 and IPv6 interface

Bug#630688: Openresolv doesn't work with dnsmasq

2011-07-25 Thread Roy Marples
Hi I've uploaded openresolv-3.4.4 to mentors@ which fixes this problem by specifying default config files to write out for dnsmasq, pdns and unbound. Please test it, and if let me know if it works for you. Thanks Roy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#634331: no longer works on a bridge interface

2011-07-18 Thread Roy Marples
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 19:14 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: dhcpcd5 fails to obtain an address (it fails to put packets on the wire) when the interface is a bridge. Manual configuration works, as does IPv6 autoconf and isc-dhcp-client, so the problem seems to be with dhcpcd. Seems to work fine

Bug#630688: Openresolv doesn't work with dnsmasq

2011-06-20 Thread Roy Marples
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 07:45 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: On 17/06/11 07:34, Roy Marples wrote: On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 00:02 +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: The point I'm making is that replacing dhcpd with dhcpcd5 broke a working system by replacing resolvconf with openresolv. I'd like

Bug#630688: Openresolv doesn't work with dnsmasq

2011-06-17 Thread Roy Marples
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 00:02 +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: The point I'm making is that replacing dhcpd with dhcpcd5 broke a working system by replacing resolvconf with openresolv. I'd like to clarify whose bug that is: ... No, it worked out of the box. Well, that is interesting because

Bug#630688: Openresolv doesn't work with dnsmasq

2011-06-16 Thread Roy Marples
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 11:54 +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: Investigation showed that the openresolv doesn't write /var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf, instead appending the DHCP-provided name servers to /etc/resolv.conf (*after* 127.0.0.1, which is why everything broke). openresolv does not come

Bug#601312: openresolv should provide various hooks

2010-10-25 Thread Roy Marples
On 25/10/2010 08:10, Vadim Solomin wrote: To be a drop-in replacement, openresolv should provide ifupdown, dhclient and pppd hooks, just as resolvconf does. It would be more logical to add resolvconf support to each package, dhclient, pppd, etc which is how it is done in other distros. But

Bug#595081: ITP: openresolv -- management framework for resolv.conf

2010-08-31 Thread Roy Marples
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Roy Marples r...@marples.name * Package name: openresolv Version : 3.3.5 Upstream Author : Roy Marples r...@marples.name * URL : http://roy.marples.name/projects/openresolv * License : BSD-2 Programming Lang: Shell

Bug#595089: ITP: dhcpcd-gtk -- GTK+ frontend for dhcpcd and wpa_supplicant

2010-08-31 Thread Roy Marples
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Roy Marples r...@marples.name * Package name: dhcpcd-gtk Version : 0.5.1 Upstream Author : Roy Marples r...@marples.name * URL : http://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd-ui * License : BSD-2 Programming Lang: C

Bug#595081: ITP: openresolv -- management framework for resolv.conf

2010-08-31 Thread Roy Marples
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 15:17 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: We already have one of these called resolvconf, and it has plenty of bugs without adding a *second* framework for managing resolv.conf. Please coordinate with the resolvconf maintainer and, preferably, merge your efforts with the

Bug#595081: ITP: openresolv -- management framework for resolv.conf

2010-08-31 Thread Roy Marples
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 15:20 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Roy Marples wrote: Description : management framework for resolv.conf Allows multiple daemons to manage resolv.conf and configures local resolvers such as dnsmasq and unbound. How does this differ from

Bug#594672: ITP: dhcpcd5 -- a DHCP client

2010-08-28 Thread Roy Marples
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Roy Marples r...@marples.name * Package name: dhcpcd5 Version : 5.2.7 Upstream Author : Roy Marples r...@marples.name * URL : http://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd * License : BSD-2 Programming Lang: C, Shell

Bug#594672: ITP: dhcpcd5 -- a DHCP client

2010-08-28 Thread Roy Marples
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 11:19 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Am 28.08.2010 10:35, schrieb Roy Marples: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Roy Marplesr...@marples.name * Package name: dhcpcd5 Version : 5.2.7 Upstream Author : Roy Marplesr...@marples.name * URL

Bug#594672: ITP: dhcpcd5 -- a DHCP client

2010-08-28 Thread Roy Marples
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 13:13 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 08/28/2010 12:44 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 09:35:29 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: * Package name: dhcpcd5 Version : 5.2.7 Upstream Author : Roy Marples r...@marples.name * URL

Bug#594672: ITP: dhcpcd5 -- a DHCP client

2010-08-28 Thread Roy Marples
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 12:33 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Am 28.08.2010 12:11, schrieb Roy Marples: dhcpcd is a one stop IPv4 network management daemon which includes It only supports IPv6? Only IPv4 at present. IPv6 support, at least for RA is planned for the next major version

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-08-19 Thread Roy Marples
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:29 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: you can lower the build dependencies to from debhelper (= 7.0.50~) to debhelper (= 7.0.15). this way it will also compile on debian lenny. Dropping the dependency now gives this lintian error. dhcpcd5 source:

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-29 Thread Roy Marples
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 19:32 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: Aside from that, I think I've addressed all issues so the only thing left is to make dhcpcd-3 alternatives friendly which I assume you will do? Any progress here? Thanks Roy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-17 Thread Roy Marples
On 15/06/2010 21:13, Simon Kelley wrote: I have the dhcpcd5 package installed and running. It seems to be behaving itself and looks like a good start. Some observations of things that should be looked at. . The source package should be dhcpcd5, not dhcpcd, since the existing source package is

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-17 Thread Roy Marples
On 17/06/2010 10:17, Roy Marples wrote: The only valid reason for co-existence so far is that some flags have been removed from the commandline that could be used by other people/programs. dhcpcd-4 shipped with some compat code to handle the transition from dhcpcd-123 to dhcpcd-4, to give both

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-17 Thread Roy Marples
On 17/06/2010 14:03, Simon Kelley wrote: I still bear the scars from an email I once got from someone who had driven 200 miles to reboot a box which had dropped off the net as a result of an automatic update to dhcpcd. I'm not really seeing how that is relevant to the topic at hand as that

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-11 Thread Roy Marples
Resent as it didn't make it to the bug report On 10/06/2010 20:59, Simon Kelley wrote: I'm very much in favour of moving to a dhcpcd5 package. Given my terrible record in getting stuff done on this I'm not going to promise to do it, but I will sponsor uploads if needed, and I'll certainly test

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-10 Thread Roy Marples
Hi I'm upstream for dhcpcd and have recently installed Ubuntu on one of my machines and as such have a vested interest and now the means of using my software on a Debian based system. I have packages prepared for dhcpcd, dhcpcd-dbus and dhcpcd-gtk already and will work on one for openresolv

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-10 Thread Roy Marples
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 20:59 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: I'm very much in favour of moving to a dhcpcd5 package. Given my terrible record in getting stuff done on this I'm not going to promise to do it, but I will sponsor uploads if needed, and I'll certainly test things. Roy, please shout

Bug#415119: closed by Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#415119: fixed in dash 0.5.3-8)

2007-06-26 Thread Roy Marples
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:54:04 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #415119: dash compiles incorrectly when LC_ALL isn't C, which was filed against the dash package. It has been closed by Gerrit Pape [EMAIL

Bug#415119: dash compiles incorrectly when LC_ALL isn't C

2007-03-23 Thread Roy Marples
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:47:44 + Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 415119 + patch forwarded 415119 upstream quit On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:02:16AM +, Roy Marples wrote: When LC_ALL is set to something like en_GB.UTF-8 then dash makes the builtincmd structure in the wrong

Bug#415119: dash compiles incorrectly when LC_ALL isn't C

2007-03-16 Thread Roy Marples
Package: dash Version 0.5.3-7 When LC_ALL is set to something like en_GB.UTF-8 then dash makes the builtincmd structure in the wrong lexical order, breaking bsearch, specifically the truecmd : $ : dash: :: not found The attached patch addresses the issue. Thanks Roy Marples--- dash-0.5.3.orig