someone with more knowledge than me to fix that).
I use 0.13.1, but the version to package depends on:
* when there is going to be another release (I don't know this)
* whether most current users use 0.13.1 or ROTD (I don't know but can find this
out).
Cheers,
Roy Ward.
Barry Freese wrote:
Hi
.
Cheers,
Roy Ward.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it is at least a viable option.
If anyone else reads this (and I could check on the Mercury mailing list as well and ask the other users directly), I'm
open to suggestions on this.
There's also another delay on me spending time on this - I'm shortly going away
till end of Jan.
Cheers,
Roy Ward
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Have you made some progress on this package?
Some, but not enough to submit a package.
One bit of news is that gcc-3.3 is going to be the required compiler. I've looking at building Mercury 0.13.1 with
several versions of gcc on x86 and amd64, and while projects are fine
on it.
Cheers,
Roy Ward.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
severity 423298 normal
reassign 423298 wnpp
retitle 423298 O: mercury -- A new logic/functional programming language
thanks
On 01/06/07 at 22:02 +1200, Roy Ward wrote:
I'd like to adopt the mercury (and mercury-docs) packages, unless someone
more qualified wishes to do
as to avoid any risk of duplication of effort - if someone else is looking at
doing this, please let me know!
Cheers,
Roy Ward.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo
