It looks like upstream has remove the pcre dependency entirely in their
main development branch, but this change isn’t yet part of a stable
release.
https://github.com/ashaduri/gsmartcontrol/issues/40[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://github.com/ashaduri
firewall issue instead of a KDE
Connect
issue.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067873
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Thanks for the hint about nftables. I had the same problem and this pointed
me in the right direction. (In my case I just uninstalled both iptables and
nftables as I don’t use either one.)
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Control: tags -1 patch
I created a merge request at:
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebengine/-/merge_requests/
26[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebengine/-/merge_requests/
26
signature.asc
Description
WebEngine 5 is reaching end-of-life.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://wiki.qt.io/QtWebEngine/ChromiumVersions
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt6/qt6-webengine/-/commit/
d4ea2d870d0db1afc9c16668bf537f8fac28f3d7
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
ze).
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_does_.2BIBw-dfsg.2BIB0_or_.2BIBw-ds.
2BIB0_in_the_version_string_mean.3F[1]
If you don’t intend to repackage the upstream tarball you probably need to
modify your
configuration to not do so.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1]
https://wiki.debian.org/Debian
ren,
>
> Sorry for delay. I converted the sources into separate libraries in new
> mentors upload. The soname will change every new version.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Mateusz,
Did you have any questions about what I was asking here?
Soren
On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 2:40:04 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Mateusz,
>
> When compiling locally on my system, the current version of lintian
(2.117.0)
> found the following problems. These are n
rse about this online.
>
> This package didn't have a salsa repository created for it, I am unsure
> whether I should create a repository under my own namespace or if the
> package should be placed under the debian namespace.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> Shriram Ravindr
On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 1:43:53 AM MST Simon Ruderich wrote:
> The problem was the -std=gnu++11 which mas missing in the regexp,
> now fixed in [1].
Thank you.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ub.com/primer/octicons> (MIT
> Licensed SVGs)
>
> The font has only 1 glyph, Would it suffice to add this source image to
> d/missing-souces and add that copyright info to d/copyright?
I would assume so. If anyone on mentors knows differently please speak up.
> O
inified and pasted in them. While others have the sources that were
> used to generate them listed in the same folder.
>
> Should I copy these sources into the d/missing-sources directory?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebe
why qt5ct is including this shared library, if there are any other packages in
Debian that are building against this library, and if you feel that any of the
lintian checks above apply? If you feel they don’t apply I would recommend
you add lintian overrides and I will be happy to upload your pack
case. I was
> wondering whether it would be okay to suppress these errors. Is there
> any other way to solve this?
>
> --
> Shriram Ravindranathan
>
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Control: affects -1 + python3-electrum
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
address the two bug reports at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no=afdko[1]
As well as looking into the problem you described at:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-fonts/2021/07/msg9.html
If you are amenable to that I can prepare MRs on Salsa and submit them to
package are:
fonts-adobe-sourcesans3
fonts-adobe-source-sans3
fonts-adobe-source-sans-3
Does anyone have a strong preference as to which is used?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://github.com/adobe-fonts/source-sans/issues/192
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Control: tags -1 + pending
Thanks for catching this. python3-cbor is listed in build-depends, but the
system isn’t propagating that to the python3-electrum package. I will
manually add it when I package the next upstream release, which I am planning
to do in the next few days.
--
Soren
, that is something I expect to pick up through a
combination of hard work and being willing to ask questions.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: angelfish
Version: 22.11-1+b4
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
Angelfish currently depends on a private header for QQuickWebEngineDownloadItem.
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057755 for context.
This can be determined using the following
Package: kmail
Version: 4:22.12.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477443
When composing an email in both plain text and HTML, the plain text is
truncated at 60 lines when the email is sent. The HTML contains the entire
message.
Source: qt6-webengine
Version: 6.4.2-final+dfsg-12
Severity: normal
Currently security patches to Qt WebEngine are not uploaded to Debian stable.
The purpose of this bug report is to track efforts to change that.
Source: usrmerge
Version: 37
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Sbuild environments based on unstable are currently broken because they cannot
update
from version 37 to version 38.
The following packages will be upgraded:
cpp-12 dpkg dpkg-dev g++-12 gcc-12
Package: blhc
Version: 0.13+git20230913.fb2c46d-1
Severity: normal
This bug appears to be a revival of #994422. It appears the that regex
exception added there needs to be slightly tweaked
to apply to all affected scenarios.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994422
It affects
e's no need
> to chase.
>
> Please go ahead.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Would you be interested in a patch to implement this functionality?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Are the any changes I should make before I upload a package?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 8:02:43 PM MST Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:15:32 -0700 Soren Stoutner
> Really odd that I now get a "permission denied" error when I try to
> access that upstream bug. :(
I also get that, but when I log in it then allows me
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: elect...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:electrum
[ Reason ]
A bug was discovered in a component known as Lightning of Electrum 4.1.0 -
4.4.5.
Package: electrum
Version: 4.4.6+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
4.3.4+dfsg1-1 is susceptible to the Lightning bug fixed upstream in version
4.4.6.
Would you be interested in a patch to implement this functionality?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Would you be interested in a patch to implement this functionality?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: chromium
Version: 114.0.5735.198-1
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
There are a number of files that depend on Python's deprecated distutils.
>From
>https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?=chromium=html_information=on
build/win/message_compiler.py:11
Source: qt6-webengine
Version: 6.4.2-final+dfsg-5
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
There are a number of files that depend on Python's deprecated distutils.
>From
>https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?=qt6-webengine=html_information=on
Source: qtwebengine-opensource-src
Version: 5.15.13+dfsg-1~deb12u1
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
There are a number of packages that depend on Python's deprecated distutils.
>From
>https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?=qtwebengine-opensource-src=html_information=on
Source: linux-signed-amd64
Version: 6.3.7+1
Severity: normal
On my laptop running an AMD Ryzen 7 5700U CPU, when on battery there are
problems with the core frequency logic.
When a process consumes 100% CPU usage on a single core, the system forces the
core frequencey to the lowest value (399
Source: chromium
Version: 113.0.5672.126-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Upstream recently added plumbing for building against a system libtiff.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033747
This means that there is only one system library outstanding: libsrtp.
Adding support
Source: qt6-webengine
Version: 6.4.2-final+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Beginning with 6.5, Qt WebEngine will have the plumbing to build against a
system libpng.
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-112466
The purpose of this bug report is to provide a reminder that once 6.5 is
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
in /usr/share/hunspell-bdic.
More detailed information can be found in the dictionary packager
documentation at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
documentation at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
in /usr/share/hunspell-bdic.
More detailed information can be found in the dictionary packager
documentation at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
documentation at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
documentation
at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
documentation
at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
https://salsa.debian.org/sorenstoutner/chromium/-/commit/
4e771687e558a3c0b3c8dc052664e249d0db3c56[1] fixes this issue, but for
some reason I can’t create a merge request.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/sorenstoutner/chromium/-/commit
documentation
at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: libqt6webenginecore6
Version: 6.4.2-final+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
WebEngine currently builds with an embedded copy of libtiff.
https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=qt6-webengine
As described in the upstream Qt bug report, this appears to be a problem with
the
Package: chromium
Version: 111.0.5563.110-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Chromium currently builds with an embedded copy of libtiff. This is likely
pulled in by the embedded pdfium, althouth it might also be used in other
places. Chromium usually detects the presence of system libraries at
documentation
at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
documentation
at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
documentation
at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
documentation
at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
documentation
at:
file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic[1]
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] file:///usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html#hunspell-bdic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
of Qt change in
Debian.
All you should need to do is the following:
1. Build-depends on `convert-bdic`.
2. Use /usr/bin/convert-bdic to do the dictionary conversion.
3. Place the .bdic files in /usr/share/hunspell-bdic.
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
ated in 2015, it looks like
those
particular licenses were only fixed in the repository in April 2022. Which
explains the
Chromium 108/111 difference.
> > with the license at:
> Yeah, breakpad's LICENSE file needs to be corrected. I can send a patch
> upstream for that.
Thanks.
--
Soren St
Examples of how to appropriately relicense files that fail under this new
Lintian check are
below:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033134[1]
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033135[2]
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033136[3]
--
Soren
There is a Salsa merge request that fixes this problem.
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/461[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/461
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
t support the Unicode standard. This phrase does not
exist in the license that Unicode adopted later and which they relicensed
their files to use.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
nor stable updates of Qt WebEngine
> for current/previous Debian releases so far, but I am very glad to hear
> that they are being worked on for the Debian bookworm release at least.
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/
--
rds,
>
> Mezgani Ali
> +212 6 44 17 94 51
> ali.mezg...@nativelabs.ma
> https://wiki.debian.org/mezgani
>
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Active member of IETF, GNU, Debian, FreeBSD and Kernel.
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀
> ⠈⠳⣄⠀
>
> > On 15/03/2023, at 19:52, Soren Stoutner wrote:
>
coverage in oldstable).
Soren
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 11:34:58 AM MST Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 06:41:55PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > Paul,
> >
> > I /am/ one of the Debian Qt WebEngine maintainers, and I also submit
PM MST you wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-03-11 at 14:41 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > * URL : https://www.stoutner.com/privacy-browser-pc/
> > privacybrowser - web browser that respects your privacy
>
> I note that this browser depends on Qt WebEngine, all the Q
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "privacybrowser":
* Package name : privacybrowser
Version : 0.1-1
Upstream contact : Soren Stoutner
* URL : https://www.stoutner.com/privacy-
the versions of Qt change in
Debian.
All you should need to do is the following:
1. Build-depends on `convert-bdic`.
2. Use /usr/bin/convert-bdic to do the dictionary conversion.
3. Place the .bdic files in /usr/share/hunspell-bdic.
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
Package: lintian
Version: 2.116.3
Severity: wishlist
Lintian currently produces warnings like the following:
inconsistent-appstream-metadata-license appdata.xml (gfdl-1.3 != gfdl-niv-1.3+)
[debian/copyright]
AppStream metadata defines a specific short list of acceptable licenses as
described
]
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dictionaries-common/-/merge_requests/6
[2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qt6-webengine
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Soren Stoutner
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: privacybrowser
Version : 0.1
Upstream Contact: Soren Stoutner
* URL : https://www.stoutner.com/privacy-browser-pc/
* License : (GPLv3
can
add about the
hardware wallets you use:
https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/merge_requests/16[1]
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/merge_requests/16
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
I have added a proposed README file, which can be seen at:
https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/merge_requests/16[1]
Let me know if there is anything else I should add or if you think anything
should be
reworded.
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https
I have recently started working on the Electrum package and came across
this old bug. Can you confirm that it is still an issue. It looks like at
least
some aspects of it have already been addressed upstream.
https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/4637[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so
I recently started working on the Electrum package and noticed this bug report
for a very old version. Can you confirm if this is still an issue?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I have recently started working on the Element package. I noticed this bug
for a really old version. Can you confirm if it still exists in the current
package?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I have recently started working on Electrum. I see this bug, which is for a
really old version. Can you confirm if it is still a problem?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
; (trixie or whatever), of course, but if it's easier for the dependency
> chain; I'm open to discussing having chromium provide it.
>
> I haven't followed all of this very long thread, so it may be
> irrelevant at this point. :)
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
sign
concern. But the burden on Qt packagers, myself
or others, going forward is very minimal.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 11:22:01 AM MST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer wrote:
> El jueves, 16 de febrero de 2023 13:42:42 -03 Soren Stoutner escribió:
> > Seeing as this is how Qt
ays a PITA. And I do not
> expect that to change, I'm afraid.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
do not understand is why is this needed on both Qt 5 and Qt 6?
> What I understand from the thread is that currently any of them can provide
> the dictionaries, so why not keeping this under just one source package?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Would this be the type of patch that is more appropriate to submit upstream?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
file installed with Electrum.
Would you be willing to send me a list of what you have done to get hardware
wallets
working for you and which hardware wallets are supported by these steps?
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://pypi.org/project/ledger-bitcoin
, February 6, 2023 3:39:25 PM MST Agustin Martin wrote:
> El sáb, 4 feb 2023 a las 20:20, Rene Engelhard () escribió:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 04.02.23 um 19:14 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
> > > Seeing as how .bdic files are not exclusive to Qt, qt-convert-dict is
> > > probab
y absence, and sorry if it's already discussed:
>
> Why convert-dict? Sounds to generic to me, can't we at least do
> qt-convert-dict or bdic-convert-dict or so?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Rene
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
these changes, specifically that Hunspell language packages
should build-
depend on the `convert-dict` virtual package and use the unversioned
/usr/bin/convert_dict
to create the .bdic files.
On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 1:25:59 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> In discussion with the Qt 5 maintainer, we h
t; and later stage.
>
> I need learn more about Debian policy along with your guideline.
>
> All the best.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: qutebrowser
Version: 2.5.2-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Debian recently added support for Hunspell .bdic binary dictionaries used by Qt
WebEngine.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020387
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebengine/-/merge_requests/12
This has some relation to the integration of the Hunspell .bdic files into
Debian.
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030183[1] and
the links it contains.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030183
Package: falkon
Version: 22.12.0-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Debian recently added support for system-wide .bdic binary dictionaries used by
Qt WebEngine.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020387
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebengine/-/merge_requests/12
11:37:58 AM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> For sake of completeness, it was previously discussed that it would be
> possible to patch the Qt WebEngine source to directly look for the
> dictionaries in /usr/share/hunspell-bdic instead of the default upstream
> location. It is unclear how
Would you be interested in a patch to fix the false positives in this Lintian
check?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Thank you.
On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 2:47:01 PM MST Axel Beckert wrote:
> But I'll at least try to update doc/lintian.rst so that at least the
> content is ready once we can update the website again.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
> I think the answer is that what Debian calls "MIT (Expat)" on that
> page matches what SPDX calls "MIT" (I don't think they are "the same"
> because the underlying concepts of what a license is and so forth are
> not the same).
>
> Richard
--
It would probably be helpful to update the documentation at
https://lintian.debian.org/manual/index.html#format-of-override-files[1] to
describe the new pointed hints format.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://lintian.debian.org/manual/index.html#format-of-override
Once this bug has been fixed, it would probably make sense to update the
Lintian description to indicate that the problematic file can be appropriately
relicensed to a DFSG compatible license, with a link to this bug report for
information about the details.
--
Soren Stoutner
so
There is some additional information in the Lintian bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854209[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854209
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I recently came across this bug report while working on cleaning up Lintian
errors on
qtwebengine-opensource-src.
The summarized version of the problem is that the file was originally licensed
under a non-
DFSG-free license, but was later changed by Unicode to be under a DFSG-free
licence.
Source: binaryen
Version: 108-1
Severity: wishlist
Your source contains a copy of ConvertUTF.cpp at
third_party/llvm-project/ConvertUTF.cpp.
As https://lintian.debian.org/tags/license-problem-convert-utf-code indicates,
the license listed at the top of the file is not DFSG-free.
However, as
elines-and-templates/[1]
On Monday, January 16, 2023 11:48:48 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> There appears to be some question of opinion as to if the Debian MIT (Expat)
> License is the same as the SPDX MIT License.
>
> https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/mit[1]
>
> https://
There appears to be some question of opinion as to if the Debian MIT (Expat)
License is
the same as the SPDX MIT License.
https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/mit[1]
https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html[2]
Can somebody at Debian Legal please comment?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
), there probably shouldn’t be any question that these are
simply two
different names for the same license (for reasons that probably shouldn’t
surprise me,
open-source people can’t just get along and agree on a name).
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://spdx.org/licenses
I created a new bug report to discuss this issue as the root cause ends up
being different than what was originally reported here.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029055[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
1 - 100 of 353 matches
Mail list logo
