Bug#945389: skimage: FTBFS with python3.8 (test failures)

On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:31:34 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > I am going to fix this (and the other problems) and plan to upload the > new version to unstable ASAP (today or tomorrow). Thank you, Ole; I much appreciate you getting to the bottom of the issue.

Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

Hi Andreas, On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:53:03 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hmmm, I think the Cython files are generated in the build I did. Sorry, I missed that! I saw at the bottom of the log: E AttributeError: type object 'skimage.feature.orb_cy.array' has no attribute '__reduce_cython__'

Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

Hi Andreas and Ole, The problem here stems from an old version of Cython. My recommended approach would be to build from the git tag instead of the source tarball (i.e., the version without pre-generated Cython files). I don't think the Cython-related patches that were applied since would

Bug#941228: RFS: nvpy/2.0.0-1

nch, after setting path * Remove unused files in from nvpy/icons -- Stefan van der Walt Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:31:56 -0700 Thanks in advance for your help. Stéfan -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Ar

Bug#940811: ITP: python-simplenote -- Python API wrapper for the Simplenote web service

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019, at 22:53, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:43:48PM -0700, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > > * Package name: python-simplenote > > Programming Lang: Python > > Description : Python API wrapper for the Simplenote web service &

Bug#940811: ITP: python-simplenote -- Python API wrapper for the Simplenote web service

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stefan van der Walt * Package name: python-simplenote Version : 2.1.4 Upstream Author : Daniel Schauenberg * URL : https://github.com/mrtazz/simplenote.py * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description

Bug#901377: ping (was: Re: skimage: FTBFS and Debci failure with NumPy 1.14)

On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:57:47 +, Lumin wrote: > Briefly speaking, we plan to team-upload skimage (= 0.14.0) to resolve > this RC bug if the original maintainers allows us to do so. We'll try > to fix this after one week if the original maintainers didn't take > action. That sounds like a good

Bug#878848: skimage

Hi Ole On Tue, Oct 17, 2017, at 11:46, Ole Streicher wrote: > On 17.10.2017 20:22, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > > As upstream maintainer, I admit to being a bit confused: we agreed to > > move maintenance to the Debian Science Team, but then watched as skimage > > was

Bug#878848: skimage

Hi Ole As upstream maintainer, I admit to being a bit confused: we agreed to move maintenance to the Debian Science Team, but then watched as skimage was dropped from testing. If the team does not take responsibility for keeping the package up to date, who is ultimately responsible? Thank you

Bug#848112: Python-skimage depends on unavailable package python-dask

OK by me, too. On December 22, 2016 9:45:10 PM Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: On December 22, 2016 4:52:41 PM EST, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi folks, can we please, pretty please start acting now and move this package to a place were people who intend to

Bug#848112: Python-skimage depends on unavailable package python-dask

I would have absolutely no problem moving skimage to team maintenance. If Yarik agrees, I'd appreciate some pointers on how to move forward with that. What I would like is to remain in the loop w.r.t. packaging changes. python-dask should be packaged now, I think Diane Trout of one of the teams

Bug#817779: Dask & Toolz

Yes, absolutely no problem on both counts. I'm happy to be a backup/support, so let me know if there is anything you need me to do.

Bug#817779: Dask & Toolz

Thank you for all this information. I can make the suggested changes, but this isn't currently high on my priority list. I package so infrequently that the overhead of tracking the latest requirements becomes quite high. Would you be willing to take over the packaging here?

Bug#817779: Dask & Toolz

I packaged toolz and pushed it to mentors, but no one picked it up. My attempt is here: https://github.com/stefanv/toolz/tree/debian I would be happy if you could take this further. Are you also planning on packaging Dask and Distributed? On Fri, Dec 2, 2016, at 15:51, Diane Trout wrote: >

Bug#817779: ITP: toolz -- Python utility functions for iterators, functions, and dictionaries

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stefan van der Walt <stef...@berkeley.edu> * Package name: python-toolz Version : 0.7.1 Upstream Author : Matthew Rocklin <mrock...@gmail.com> * URL : http://toolz.readthedocs.org/ * License : BSD Prog

Bug#817777: ITP: dask -- Dask is a simple task scheduling system that uses directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks to break up large computations into many small ones.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stefan van der Walt <stef...@berkeley.edu> * Package name: dask Version : 0.8.0 Upstream Author : Matthew Rocklin <mrock...@gmail.com> * URL : http://dask.pydata.org * License : BSD Programming

Bug#725482: ITP: nvpy -- Simplenote-syncing note-taking application, inspired by Notational Velocity

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stefan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za * Package name: nvpy Version : 0.9.4 Upstream Author : Charl Botha cpbo...@debian.org * URL : https://github.com/cpbotha/nvpy * License : BSD-3 Programming Lang: Python Description

Bug#505999: Added to NumPy bugtracker

This bug has been entered as http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/955 in the NumPy bug tracker. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]