Bug#1009856: chrony: Support refclock in /etc/chrony/sources.d

2022-04-19 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Package: chrony Version: 4.0-8+deb11u2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, please consider adding support for 'refclock' in /etc/chrony/sources.d. Some compute providers (Azure, Hetzner, KVM) support PTP as a high-precision alternative to NTP but that feature requires to configure a refclock

Bug#611526: Unable to create libcurl socket /var/cache/apt-cacher/libcurl.socket

2011-01-31 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Am 30.01.2011 23:57, schrieb Mark Hindley: Could you apply this patch to /usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher-lib.pl and see if it helps if you have chmod /var/cache/apt-cacher to root:root. This is the result: # chown root:root /var/cache/apt-cacher # /etc/init.d/apt-cacher stop

Bug#611526: Unable to create libcurl socket /var/cache/apt-cacher/libcurl.socket

2011-01-30 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Package: apt-cacher Version: 1.6.12 Severity: important Some requests to the apt-cacher fail with the error message Fri Jan 14 13:15:40 2011|info [8539]: Warning: apt-cacher failed to connect to libcurl Fri Jan 14 13:15:40 2011|error [8543]: Unable to create libcurl socket

Bug#611526: Unable to create libcurl socket /var/cache/apt-cacher/libcurl.socket

2011-01-30 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Hi Mark! Am 30.01.2011 16:55, schrieb Mark Hindley: Some requests to the apt-cacher fail with the error message Only some? Which don't? Yes, only some requests failed. I haven't found a rule but I can provide you the error and access log files. Were they root:root before or something else?

Bug#611526: Unable to create libcurl socket /var/cache/apt-cacher/libcurl.socket

2011-01-30 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Am 30.01.2011 19:54, schrieb Mark Hindley: Yes, I think so. When (approximately!) was your original apt-cacher install? I wonder if it was before the option to run as www-data was introduced. That was also before I was maintainer and I don't have the sources, so I am a bit in the dark.

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

2011-01-05 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Hi Ian, Am 05.01.2011 14:11, schrieb Ian Campbell: Netback is supposed to drop such invalid packets, however I've just found a patch in my .git/patches, dated August 2009, to do this which I forgot to send upstream. I'll do that now! Shall I still test something or just wait for the fix? I

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

2011-01-05 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Hi, Am 05.01.2011 14:57, schrieb Ian Campbell: Per my previous mail please can you let me know the details of the Windows driver versions you are using, where you got them from etc. PV drivers are Citrix WHQL server for XenServer 5.5, don't know download source anymore (looked for it in

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

2011-01-05 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Hi, Am 05.01.2011 17:22, schrieb Ian Campbell: I'd strongly recommend upgrading to something newer, such as the drivers supplied with the XCP 1.0 beta. The beta designation does not apply to the Windows driver component of this release, they are a GA version of the drivers.

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

2011-01-04 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Hi Ian, I've tried with 2.6.32-28 but problem persists. So we have a problem with symptoms similar to #596802. I'll attach the oops details. Regards, Stephan Jan 4 17:46:33 n0020 kernel: [ 82.100424] device vif1.0 entered promiscuous mode Jan 4 17:46:33 n0020 kernel: [ 82.103545] br0:

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

2011-01-04 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Hello, Am 04.01.2011 18:33, schrieb Ian Campbell: I don't suppose you feel inclined to bisect between -23 and -28 to find the first broken version, do you? (http://snapshot.debian.org/ is your friend here) I've checked... -23: oops -24: oops -25: oops -26: oops -27: oops -28: oops -29: oops

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

2011-01-02 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Hi Ian! Am 02.01.2011 20:27, schrieb Ian Campbell: Did -28 work OK? Otherwise what was the last known good kernel? The -29 kernel was the one that was installed when I've setup Squeeze. So, there was never a different kernel on that system. Anyway... I can try -28 and see what happens. The

Bug#608144: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops: net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)

2010-12-27 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-29 Severity: important The bug reported in #596802 seems to have reappeared in kernel 2.6.32-29. Problem arises when network traffic starts in freshly started HVM domain (W2k8R2, Citrix WHQL drivers). I've already upgraded the e1000e module from the one in

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-05-26 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Hi all, Am 22.05.2010 19:42, schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff: 2.6.32.12 has introduced lots of xfs bugfixes. Please try the current 2.6.32-13 kernel from unstable. If the error can still be reproduced it should be reported upstream at bugzilla.kernel.org Looks like my issue has been solved with

Bug#573936: milter-greylist: Errors when reading back e-mail addresses from greylist.db

2010-03-15 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Package: milter-greylist Version: 3.0-3.1 Severity: normal Last night my milter-greylist crashed with a segfault: Mar 15 01:53:33 n0034 kernel: [55124.848954] milter-greylist[1662]: segfault at 130 ip 7fd0a8e33900 sp 420030f0 error 4 in libmilter.so.1.0.1[7fd0a8e28000+f000] When restarting

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-02-23 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Hi all, Am 23.02.2010 11:35, schrieb maximilian attems: xfsdump version is not specified. Stefan could you add that info? output of: dpkg -l xfsdump Here we go... # dpkg -l xfsdump Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold |

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-02-22 Thread Stephan Austermühle
No issues so far with 2.6.32. xfsdump to tape seems to work better now, i.e. no panics. I think we can close this bug. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-02-22 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Ooops... just seconds after my mail the server panic'd while xfsdumping to tape: Kernel panic - not syncing: xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim 0x8800642fcd80 Pid: 47, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.32-2-amd64 #1 Call trace: [...] ? panic+0x86/0x141 [...] ? __up_write+0x12/0x45 [...]

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-02-14 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Sorry, cannot find an updated 2.6.30-2-amd64 on unstable. Do you mean 2.6.32-2-amd64? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature