Bug#1070396: exim4: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2024-05-04 Thread Svante Signell
Source: exim4 Version: 4.97-8 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, exim4 FTBFS on hurd-i386, but built before. Latest successful build was 4.94-19. Attached are two patches enabling a successful build: -

Bug#1069094: mariadb: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2024-04-16 Thread Svante Signell
Source: mariadb Version: 10.11.7-4 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, mariadb FTBFS on hurd-i386. Attached are three patches enabling a successful build: - debian_rules.patch: 

Bug#1029097: pam: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2024-04-11 Thread Svante Signell
; > There's a typo here ^ > > > +#define PATH_MAX 4096 > > +#endif > > Cheers Thanks, New patch attached. Description: define PATH_MAX for compatibility when it's not already set Some platforms, such as the Hurd, don't set PATH_MAX. Set a reasonable defaul

Bug#1060093: lirc: Found Hurd bug in 0.10.2-0.{3,4}

2024-01-09 Thread Svante Signell
found 1060093 0.10.2-0.3 found 1060093 0.10.2-0.4 thanks

Bug#1060093: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2024-01-05 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 21:58 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for your patches. > > Svante Signell, le ven. 05 janv. 2024 21:14:19 +0100, a ecrit: > > --- a/debian/rules  2023-12-16 18:35:11.0 +0100 > > +++ b/debian/rules  2024-01-

Bug#1060093: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2024-01-05 Thread Svante Signell
Source: lirc Version: 0.10.2-0.2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, lirc FTBFS on hurd-i386. (Built in the past, last successful build version was 0.10.1-5.2) This is due to usage of __u32 (and

Bug#1056980: Lost mail!

2023-12-09 Thread Svante Signell
Hello, How come I never saw this mail?? https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=813#66 Strange, gmail hickup?? I'll comment inline when/if I find it, else I'd cut and paste from the bug report. Thanks!

Bug#1056980: [devuan-dev] bug#813: Reopen 1056980

2023-12-08 Thread Svante Signell
rol: severity -1 normal > Control: tags -1 = wontfix > > * Svante Signell [231208 19:38]: > > On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 16:15 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > reopen 1056980 > > > severity 1056980 serious > > > tags 1056980 patch > > > thanks >

Bug#1056980: [devuan-dev] bug#813: Reopen 1056980

2023-12-08 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 16:15 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > reopen 1056980 > severity 1056980 serious > tags 1056980 patch > thanks Sorry, forgot the patch! --- a/debian/netcat-traditional.postinst 2023-11-27 03:20:27.0 +0100 +++ b/debian/netcat-traditional.postinst 2023

Bug#1056980: Reopen 1056980

2023-12-08 Thread Svante Signell
reopen 1056980 severity 1056980 serious tags 1056980 patch thanks Hello, Reopening this bug due to a deliberate attempt to fool the users: Either you move binaries _and_ configuration files to /usr/bin or explicitely depend on usrmerge. And closing this bug as wontfix is not nice. I've

Bug#1057634: /sbin/hwclock: unrecognized option '--rtc=/dev/rtc0'

2023-12-06 Thread Svante Signell
And on a Devuan/Ceres box: dpkg -S /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/hwclock.rules initscripts: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/hwclock.rules dpkg -S /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85- hwclock.rules On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 18:08 +0100, Svante

Bug#1057634: /sbin/hwclock: unrecognized option '--rtc=/dev/rtc0'

2023-12-06 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 16:52 +, Mark Hindley wrote: > Martin, > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > Please note that the start target refers to a non-existing > > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules.  The correct file is > >

Bug#1057634: Fwd: Re: Bug#1057634: /sbin/hwclock: unrecognized option '--rtc=/dev/rtc0'

2023-12-06 Thread Svante Signell
--- Begin Message --- On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 12:07 +, Mark Hindley wrote: > Chris, > > Thanks for your input. > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > * Mark Hindley [231206 11:42]: > > > Is hwclock actually useful on Hurd? I (naively) expected it to be

Bug#1056311: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2023-11-20 Thread Svante Signell
Source: lirc Version: 0.10.1-7.2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, lirc FTBFS on hurd-i386. (Built in the past, last successful build version was 0.10.1-5.2) This is due to usage of __u32 in the patch

Bug#1056145: e2fsprogs: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2023-11-17 Thread Svante Signell
Source: e2fsprogs Version: 1.47.0-2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, e2fsprogs FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to usage of PATH_MAX which is not defined on GNU/Hurd. (Built in the past, last successful build

Bug#1056050: mate-power-manager: Non-installable on hurd-i386

2023-11-16 Thread Svante Signell
Source: mate-power-manager Version: 1.26.1-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, mate-power-manager is not installable on hurd-i386 due to dependencies on polkitd, pkexec, and systemd or elogind which

Bug#1056049: consolekit2: Not buildable on hurd-i386

2023-11-16 Thread Svante Signell
Source: consolekit2 Version: 1.2.6-2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, consolekit is not buildable on hurd-i386 due to a dependency on libevdev-dev which is only available for GNU/Linux. A patch

Bug#1055936: synaptic: Non-installable on hurd-i386

2023-11-14 Thread Svante Signell
Source: synaptic Version: 0.93.1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, synaptic is not installable on hurd-i386 due to dependencies on polkitd, pkexec and policykit-1 which are only available for

Bug#1055935: mate-polkit: Non-installable on hurd-i386

2023-11-14 Thread Svante Signell
Source: mate-polkit Version: 1.26.1-4 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, mate-polkit is not installable on hurd-i386 due to a dependency on polkitd, which is only available for GNU/Linux. A patch

Bug#1055875: util-linux: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2023-11-13 Thread Svante Signell
Source: util-linux Version: 2.39.2-5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, util-linux FTBFS on hurd-i386 (built in the past, last successful build was 2.39.1-4). A patch enabling a successful build is

Bug#1033007: Now gcc-13: [Fwd: [PATCH] gcc-12: Re-enable split-stack support for GNU/Hurd.]

2023-03-15 Thread Svante Signell
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 1:20230315-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hello, seems like the patch gcc_config_gnu.h.diff, in debian gcc-12 named: pr104290-followup.diff was lost

Bug#1029097: pam: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2023-01-17 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 18:49 +, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > > > > "Svante" == Svante Signell > > > > > > writes: >     Svante> modules_pam_nologin_tst-pam_nologin-retval.c.diff > disabling >     Svante> two subtests failing on GNU

Bug#1029050: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (and other archs?)

2023-01-16 Thread Svante Signell
Source: gcc-snapshot Version: 20230108-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-snapshot in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to that some patches are not applied when building gcc-snapshot. After the

Bug#1027840: gcc-11: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2023-01-03 Thread Svante Signell
Source: gcc-11 Version: 11.3.0-10 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-11-11.3.0-10 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of pthread_once (same error already

Bug#970659: GNU/Hurd patch submitted upstream #1796917

2022-10-22 Thread Svante Signell
Hi, The attached patch for the build problem on GNU/Hurd (same as the one from 2020) was submitted upstream. Upstream bug number: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1796917 Thanks! Index: nspr-4.28/nspr/pr/src/pthreads/ptsynch.c

Bug#970659: nspr: FTBFS on hurd-i386 and tests fails to run.

2022-10-22 Thread Svante Signell
found 970659 2:4.35-1 found 970673 2:4.35-1 thanks Hello again, (bug reports first filed on 20+21 september 2020 against 4.28-1) nspr still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a one-line error in the file nspr/pr/src/pthreads/ptsynch.c, see #970659. Additionally tests in runtest.sh are not run due to a

Bug#1021357: gcc-12: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2022-10-06 Thread Svante Signell
Source: gcc-12 Version: 12_12.2.0-5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-12-12.2.0-4/5 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of pthread_once (same error for

Bug#1021260: libdumbnet: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2022-10-04 Thread Svante Signell
Source: libdumbnet Version: 1.16.1-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, Currently libdumbnet FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to some failing symbols for libdumbnet1 in the Hurd build compared to Linux. I built in

Bug#1020792: tech-ctte: Halt merged-/usr transition until dpkg filesystem damage bugs are fixed

2022-09-28 Thread Svante Signell
Hi, I would really appreciate if you quote your reply properly: It was not Andreas Metzler who sent the below: > On Tue, 2022-09-27 at 18:25 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > On 2022-09-27 Zack Weinberg wrote: > > [...] On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 11:55 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > > This

Bug#1020919: socat: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2022-09-28 Thread Svante Signell
Source: socat Version: 1.7.4.3-3 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Cc: bug-hurd Hi, Currently socat FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to differing values for O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY and O_RDWR compared to Linux systems. The attached patch, xioinitialize.c.patch, 

Bug#1020918: doxygen: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2022-09-28 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 17:50 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/pull/9514 > > Svante Signell, le mer. 28 sept. 2022 17:40:32 +0200, a ecrit: > > Currently doxygen FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a PATH_MAX issue. > > This issue

Bug#1020918: doxygen: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2022-09-28 Thread Svante Signell
Source: doxygen Version: 1.9.4-3 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, Currently doxygen FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a PATH_MAX issue. The attached patch, filesystem_filesystem.hpp.diff, fixes the build problem by special-casing for Hurd. In fact the

Bug#1020904: mate-notification-daemon: Please exclude build dependency on libgtk-layer-shell-dev for GNU/Hurd

2022-09-28 Thread Svante Signell
Source: mate-notification-daemon Version: 1.26.0-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, Currently mate-notification-daemon cannot be built on GNU/Hurd due to a build-dependency on libgtk-layer-shell-dev, which in turn build-depends on 

Bug#1020792: tech-ctte: Halt merged-/usr transition until dpkg filesystem damage bugs are fixed

2022-09-28 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2022-09-27 at 18:25 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2022-09-27 Zack Weinberg wrote: > [...] > > What I am asking for is a schedule change: specifically, that the > > merged /usr transition not be allowed to proceed past the status > > quo as of two weeks ago (i.e. *before*

Bug#1005297: gcc-12-12-20220319-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2022-03-21 Thread Svante Signell
found 1005297 12-20220319-1 retitle 1005297 gcc-12-12-20220319-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386 thanks Note: gcc-12-12-20220319-1 builds fine with pr104290-followup.diff and Makefile.in.diff. Matthias, In Debian the patch gm2.diff is applied to the generated file src/Makefile.in. Why not apply

Bug#997694: Acknowledgement (unbound: FTBFS on hurd-i386)

2022-03-18 Thread Svante Signell
ping On Sun, 2021-10-24 at 09:45 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. > > You can follow progress on this Bug here: 997694: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997694. > > This is an automatically generated reply to let you

Bug#1007932: cfitsio: gdal FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to missing support for GNU/Hurd in cfitsio/fitsio.h

2022-03-18 Thread Svante Signell
Source: cfitsio Version: 4.0.0-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, gdal (3.4.1+dfsg-1, etc) FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to missing support for GNU/Hurd in cfitsio (4.0.0-1). Attached is an updated patch of 03-off_t.diff, modifying fitsio.h to

Bug#1005297: gcc-12-12-20220313-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2022-03-17 Thread Svante Signell
found 1005297 12-20220313-1 retitle 1005297 12-20220313-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386 thanks Note: gcc-12-12-20220313-1 builds fine with pr104290-followup.diff and Makefile.in.diff. Mathias, In Debian you apply the patch gm2.diff to src/Makefile.in. Why not apply Makefile.in.diff too, to make gcc-12

Bug#1005297: gcc-12-12-20220302-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2022-03-13 Thread Svante Signell
found 1005297 gcc-12-12-20220302-1 retitle 1005297 gcc-12-12-20220302-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386 tags 1005297 + patch thanks Hi again, Unfortunately the Debian patch Makefile.in.diff is needed to for a successful build. Attached again here for completeness, and should be applied after gm2.diff. For

Bug#1005297: gcc-12-12-20220222: FTBFS on hurd-i386. Was: gcc-12-12-20220214: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2022-02-22 Thread Svante Signell
retitle 1005297 gcc-12-12-20220222: FTBFS on hurd-i386 thanks On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 10:18 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding > this Bug report. Hello, Unfortunately the patch Makefile.in.diff is needed to for a

Bug#1005297: gcc-12-12-20220214: FTBFS on hurd-i386; Was: gcc-12-12-20220206: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2022-02-18 Thread Svante Signell
retitle 1005297 gcc-12-12-29229214: FTBFS on hurd-i386 thanks On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 19:34 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > Source: gcc-12 > Version: 12_12-20220206-1 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: hurd Hi again, At

Bug#997694: No update of unbound in a year??

2022-02-12 Thread Svante Signell
Ping A new upstream version is available: 1.15.0

Bug#909436: libdrm: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (#909436, updated and new patches)

2022-02-11 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 17:46 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > Hello again, > > libdrm still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, now at 2.4.109-2. Attached are two > updated patches, hurd-port.diff and path_max.diff and two new ones. > hurd_port.diff, path_max.diff, tests_amdgpu_r

Bug#1005297: gcc-12-12-20220206: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2022-02-10 Thread Svante Signell
Source: gcc-12 Version: 12_12-20220206-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, gcc-12-12-20220206 in experimental FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to missing patches for gccgo, gnu.h and an yet unresolved bug in src/Makefile.in. Attached are patches needed

Bug#1004348: hurd: FTBFS on hurd-i386 locally

2022-01-27 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 20:23 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le jeu. 27 janv. 2022 12:08:47 +0100, a ecrit: > > On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 17:54 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > So here the problem is that > > > > > > test ! -d /home > > &

Bug#1004348: hurd: FTBFS on hurd-i386 locally

2022-01-27 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 17:54 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > So here the problem is that > > test ! -d /home > > says that /home is not a directory. Is there anything special about your > /home path? Perhaps show the output of > > stat /home File: /home Size: 4096Blocks: 8

Bug#1004348: hurd: FTBFS on hurd-i386 locally

2022-01-26 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 23:42 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le mar. 25 janv. 2022 23:40:17 +0100, a ecrit: > > On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 22:16 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > But on a third image I get: > &g

Bug#1004348: hurd: FTBFS on hurd-i386 locally

2022-01-25 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 22:16 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Thanks! > > But on a third image I get: > > mkdir: cannot create directory ‘/home’: File exists > > > > Something is fishy... > > As I already wrote, first make sure exactly *what* is producing this > call. That way you'll see

Bug#1004348: hurd: FTBFS on hurd-i386 locally

2022-01-25 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 19:43 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > I can confirm again that building the package with a mere > >  dpkg-buildpackage > > works fine for me. This is as non-root user, I tried both on the / > partition, and on a separate partition. I also tried upgrading the > 20210812

Bug#1004348: hurd: FTBFS on hurd-i386 locally

2022-01-25 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 17:06 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le mar. 25 janv. 2022 17:04:41 +0100, a ecrit: > > On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 16:38 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Svante Signell, le mar. 25 janv. 2022 16:15:46 +0100, a ecrit: > > > > >

Bug#1004348: hurd: FTBFS on hurd-i386 locally

2022-01-25 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 16:38 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Svante Signell, le mar. 25 janv. 2022 16:15:46 +0100, a ecrit: > > make[3]: Entering directory '/home/.../hurd-0.9.git20211230/build- > > deb/ > > libshouldbeinlibc' > > mkdir /home > >

Bug#1004348: hurd: FTBFS on hurd-i386 locally

2022-01-25 Thread Svante Signell
Source: hurd Version: 0.9.git20211230-5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, Currently hurd FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a problem with the Makeconf/mkinstalldirs scripts. >From the build log: make -C libshouldbeinlibc install make[3]: Entering

Bug#909436: libdrm: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (#909436, updated and new patches)

2022-01-19 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 17:46 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > The added file can be incorporated in libdrm-tests.install file with > using dh_exec and making libdrm-tests.install executable. > +#! /usr/bin/dh-exec > +[hurd-any] usr/bin/amdgpu_test Add to this a build-dependency of

Bug#987557: procps: FTBFS on hurd-i386: #987557 Updated patch test_proc_siginfo for 3.3.17-6

2022-01-18 Thread Svante Signell
siginfo (Here the ifdef logic is reversed. Of course the result is the same. Additionally, indentation is corrected to the same as the original file) Thanks! Description: Cater for si_int not on Hurd Author: Svante Signell Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/987557 Reviewed-by: Craig Small Last-U

Bug#997009: Acknowledgement (libpciaccess: FTBFS on hurd-i386)

2022-01-12 Thread Svante Signell
ping On Fri, 2021-10-22 at 10:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. > > You can follow progress on this Bug here: 997009: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997009. > > This is an automatically generated reply to let

Bug#997694: unbound: #997694 Correction of argument name of setsockopt()

2022-01-12 Thread Svante Signell
ping On Sun, 2021-10-24 at 11:48 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > s/protocol level/option name/

Bug#987557: procps: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2022-01-12 Thread Svante Signell
ping On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 08:01 +1100, Craig Small wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 01:36, Svante Signell wrote: > > procps fails to build from source due to usage of field si_int of struct > > siginfo_t in lib/test_process.c which does not exist on GNU/Hurd. > >

Bug#909436: libdrm: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (#909436, updated patches)

2021-12-16 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 17:58 +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > On 6.12.2021 14.44, Svante Signell wrote: > > Hello again, > > > please send a MR upstream I'll try. But I don't know yet how to create an MR, any ideas? Thanks!

Bug#909436: libdrm: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (#909436, updated patches)

2021-12-06 Thread Svante Signell
Hello again, libdrm still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, now ate 2.4.108-1. Attached are two updated patches, hurd-port.diff and path_max.diff. libdrm-2.4.108-1 (and 2.4.104-1) has been built and tested fine on GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd. On Linux the patches have also been tested with valgrind using the

Bug#997694: unbound: #997694 Correction of argument name of setsockopt()

2021-10-24 Thread Svante Signell
s/protocol level/option name/

Bug#997694: unbound: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2021-10-24 Thread Svante Signell
Source: unbound Version: 1.13.1-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, Currently unbound FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to usage of protocol level IPV6_TCLASS, which is not defined on GNU/Hurd. The attached patch, services_listen_dnsport.c.diff, make this

Bug#926896: sysvinit-utils: pidof is unreliable

2021-10-23 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2021-10-23 at 11:22 -0300, Jesse Smith wrote: > > This is getting bogged down in the weeds and not related to whether > the readlink() patch works or not. The PATH_MAX usage is unrelated to > the fix. > > However, since you asked, PATH_MAX is set to 2048 in pidof. > > Using

Bug#997063: php8.0: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2021-10-23 Thread Svante Signell
Source: php8.0 Version: 8.0.8-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, Currently php8.0 FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to the option --with-fpm- apparmor while apparmor is no longer built on non-linux. The patch, debian_rules.diff, fixes this problem. This

Bug#926896: sysvinit-utils: pidof is unreliable

2021-10-22 Thread Svante Signell
Hi Jesse, On Thu, 2021-10-21 at 14:51 -0300, Jesse Smith wrote: > Please give the attached patch a try and confirm it's working.  It's > working here for normal and zombie processes and it seems to be okay > for uninterruptable sleep processes too, but I'd like to have someone > else confirm

Bug#997035: openssh: Please build-depend on libsystemd-dev | libelogind-dev

2021-10-22 Thread Svante Signell
Source: openssh Version: 8.4p1-6 Severity: important Tags: patch Usertags: linux Hi, Currently openssh FTBFS on GNU/Linux due to a build dependency on libsystemd-dev. The attached patch, debian_control.diff fixes this problem by build- depending on libsystemd-dev | libelogind-dev for linux-any.

Bug#997030: openssh: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2021-10-22 Thread Svante Signell
Source: openssh Version: 8.4p1-6 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, Currently openssh FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a missing definition of MAXHOSTNAMELEN. The attached patches, defines.h.diff and gss- serv.c.diff fixes these problems. These patches

Bug#997009: libpciaccess: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2021-10-22 Thread Svante Signell
Source: libpciaccess Version: 0.16-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, Currently libpciaccess FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to missing symbols in the libpciaccess0.symbols file. The attached patch, debian_libpciaccess0.symbols.hurd-i386.diff, defines

Bug#996916: gedit: FTBFS on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-any

2021-10-20 Thread Svante Signell
Source: gedit Version: 40.1-2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org debian-k...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, Currently gedit FTBFS on GNU/Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD due to failure to define ENABLE_GVFS_METADATA in config.h during configuraation. With the attached

Bug#995049: marked as done (p11-kit: FTBFS on hurd-i386)

2021-10-08 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 19:32 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > # The older patch version included in the upload did not build on > hurd. > # > # I will re-check > > reopen 995049 Hello, The problem is that p11-kit should build-depend on libbsd-dev, not libbsd0, as in the latest update to the bug.

Bug#995049: p11-kit: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (anf kfreebsd-any)

2021-10-05 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 19:09 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Hello Andreas > > Just for your info. I’m AFK for another week so i cannot test anything until > then. However, some comments are inlined below. I'm back and have now tested again on Linux, Hurd and kFreeBSD. >

Bug#995049: p11-kit: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2021-09-27 Thread Svante Signell
Hello Andreas Just for your info. I’m AFK for another week so i cannot test anything until then. However, some comments are inlined below. Skickat från min iPad > 26 sep. 2021 kl. 14:35 skrev Andreas Metzler : > >> On 2021-09-25 Svante Signell wrote: >> Source: p11

Bug#995049: p11-kit: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2021-09-25 Thread Svante Signell
Source: p11-kit Version: 0.24.0-2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org debian-k...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, Currently p11-kit FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a missing implementation in common/unix-peer.c. Fortunately the function getpeereid() is available in

Bug#988280: gftp: FTBFS on hurd-i386: fatal error: stropts.h: No such file or directory

2021-05-09 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2021-05-09 at 21:56 +0800, hahawang wrote: > Package: gftp > Severity: important > Version: 2.7.0b-1 > Tags: ftbfs,patch > User:hahawang > Usertags: hurd,hurd-i386 > X-Debbugs-CC:debian-h...@lists.debian.org,bug-h...@gnu.org > > +#if !(defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__NetBSD__) ||

Bug#909436: libdrm 2.4.102-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (updated patches)

2021-04-26 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 23:43 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello Svante, > > For information, your patch got dropped because of #975658 Yes I know since a long time. And you did not care or anybody else either. So why bother... Why spend time on worthless issues?

Bug#985645: hurd: Hurd creates buggy core files or gdb cannot read core files properly

2021-03-21 Thread Svante Signell
Source: hurd Version: 1:0.9.git20201127-7 Severity: important Tags: upstream User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hello, When hurd dumps a core file it cannot be read properly in gdb. This is either due to a bug in the Hurd package itself or a bug in gdb. The core dump code in Hurd

Bug#975585: vsftpd: #975585: Reopen due to debian_vsftpd.init.patch not applied

2021-03-04 Thread Svante Signell
reopen 975585 3.0.3-13 thanks Hello, Reopening #975585 due to that the patch debian_vsftpd.init.patch was not applied. The package is still not installable on GNU/Hurd. Thanks!

Bug#951834: php7.4: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2021-02-16 Thread Svante Signell
found 951834 7.4.15-2 retitle 951834 php7.4 FTBFS on hurd-i386 owner 951834 svante.sign...@gmail.com tags 951834 ftbfs, patch user 951834 debian-h...@lists.debian.org usertag 951834 hurd thanks Hello, Trying to build php7.4 for GNU/Hurd revealed that in addition of the patch in this bug report,

Bug#951834: php7.4-7.4.11-1: FTBFS on non-linux, #951834

2020-11-24 Thread Svante Signell
found 951834 7.4.11-1 tags 951834 ftbfs user 951834 debian-h...@lists.debian.org usertags 951834 hurd kfreebsd thanks Hello, Trying to build php7.4 for GNU/Hurd revealed that in addition of the patch in this bug report, another one is needed and attached: ext_standard_hrtime.h.patch. Thanks!

Bug#975585: vsftpd: FTBFS on hurd-i386 #975585

2020-11-24 Thread Svante Signell
Hi again, Sorry for this. The patch for debian/control should add sysvinit-utils to Depends: not Build-Depends:. New patch attached. Thanks! --- a/debian/control 2020-11-24 09:07:54.0 +0100 +++ b/debian/control 2020-11-24 09:08:36.0 +0100 @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ lsb-base (>= 3.0-6),

Bug#975585: vsftpd: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2020-11-23 Thread Svante Signell
Source: vsftpd Version: 3.0.3-12 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs, patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hello, vsftpd fails to install due to usage of a ps -C in vsftpd.init, which does not exist for GNU/Hurd. The attached patch, debian_vsftpd.init.patch, fixes this problem.

Bug#975100: zeromq3: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2020-11-18 Thread Svante Signell
Source: zeromq3 Version: 4.3.3-3 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs, patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hello, zeromq3 fails to build from source due to a PATH_MAX issue in tests/testutil.cpp, and a missing declaration of make_random_ipc_endpoint in

Bug#975054: libva: FTBFS on !linux

2020-11-18 Thread Svante Signell
Source: libva Version: 2.9.0-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs, patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org debian-k...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd kfreebsd Hello, libva fails to build due to usage of a linux-specific usage of syscall(__NR_gettid) in va/va_trace.c. The attached patch,

Bug#970673: nspr: Some tests are not run due to a bug in debian/rules

2020-09-21 Thread Svante Signell
Source: nspr Version: 4.28-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: n...@packages.debian.org Usertags: linux-any Hello, In debian/rules the runtests.sh script is not run properly. The line cd nspr/pr/tests && grep -v '^\(fdcach\|gethost\|getproto\|nblayer\|peek\|socket\|vercheck\)$$'

Bug#970659: nspr: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2020-09-20 Thread Svante Signell
Source: nspr Version: 4.28-1 Severity: Tags: ftbfs, patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hello, Currently libdrm FTBFS GNU/Hurd due to a parenthesis bug in ptsync.c. Attached is a patch to fix this: nspr_pr_src_pthreads_ptsynch.c.diff. Furthermore for the tests to succeed on

Bug#970614: gcc-10: Please disable systemtap-sdt-dev build-dep on non-Linux

2020-09-19 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2020-09-19 at 22:05 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Package: gcc-10 > Version: 10.2.0-7 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > > Hello, > > systemtap is a Linux thing, and doesn't currently build on non-Linux > ports, could you disable the dependency as the attached patch does? Hi

Bug#909436: libdrm 2.4.102-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (updated patches)

2020-09-16 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 17:14 +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > On 16.9.2020 10.53, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 23:49 +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > > > On 15.9.2020 19.50, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > Both patches (somewhat modified) submitted upst

Bug#909436: libdrm 2.4.102-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (updated patches)

2020-09-16 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 23:49 +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > On 15.9.2020 19.50, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > Both patches (somewhat modified) submitted upstream to the old > > issues: > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/issues/23 > > https://gitlab.fre

Bug#909436: libdrm 2.4.102-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (updated patches)

2020-09-15 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 20:52 +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > On 14.9.2020 18.44, Svante Signell wrote: > > found 909436 2.4.102-1 > > thanks > > > > Hello again, > > > > libdrm still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd now due to bug #970304 and still > > missing supp

Bug#909436: libdrm 2.4.102-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (updated patches)

2020-09-14 Thread Svante Signell
found 909436 2.4.102-1 thanks Hello again, libdrm still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd now due to bug #970304 and still missing support for Hurd in drm.h and xf86drm.h. Attached is a patch, hurd- port.diff, to fix this. The rest of that patch address PATH_MAX issues in xf86dri.c as PATH_MAX is not defined

Bug#970304: libdrm: FTBFS on kfreebsd-any

2020-09-14 Thread Svante Signell
Source: libdrm Version: 2.4.102-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs, patch User: debian-k...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hello, Currently libdrm FTBFS GNU/kFreeBSD (and GNU/Hurd) due to usage of #elif __FreeBSD__ instead of #elif defined(__FreeBSD__) in xf86drm.c. Attached is a patch to

Bug#969968: systemtap: FTBFS on non-linux architectures

2020-09-09 Thread Svante Signell
Source: systemtap Version: 4.3-2 Severity: important Tags: patch Usertags: hurd-i386, kfreebsd-any User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org, debian-k...@lists.debian.org Hello, Currently systemtap FTBFS on GNU/Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD-any due to several linux-specific includes in some .cxx-files and

Bug#909436: 909436: libdrm FTBFS on GNU/Hurd

2020-05-10 Thread Svante Signell
ping

Bug#960197: mesa: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2020-05-10 Thread Svante Signell
Source: mesa Version: 20.0.6-3 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs, patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hello, Currently mesa FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a missing struct definition. The NEW attached patch src_glx_dri_common.h.diff fixes that problem. Strangely this problem does not

Bug#959975: mesa: FTBFS on hurd-i386

2020-05-07 Thread Svante Signell
Source: mesa Version: 20.0.6-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs, patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hello, Currently mesa FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a missing struct definition. Version 20-0.4-2 built successfully earlier. The attached patch src_glx_dri_common.h.diff fixes

Bug#956414: RFS: eudev/3.2.9-7+debian2: [ITP] /dev/ and hotplug management daemon

2020-05-02 Thread Svante Signell
Hi again, I uploaded a new version, 3.2.9-7+debian2 which fixes many lintian warnings: * binary-control-field-duplicates-source * out-of-date-standards-version * package-uses-old-debhelper-compat-version * xc-package-type-in-debian-control * rules-requires-root-missing *

Bug#956414: #956414: Upload a partially fixed version?

2020-05-01 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2020-04-13 at 00:36 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Hi again, > > I saw that there was some complaints from lintian of the uploaded > version. I've fixed some of them. Upload again? > > BTW: running lintian with the --pedantic flag does not show all > issues as 9

Bug#909436: libdrm: Found 909436 2.4.101-2

2020-04-24 Thread Svante Signell
found 909436 2.4.101-2 thanks

Bug#956820: gccgo does not implement syscall in hurd-i386

2020-04-17 Thread Svante Signell
Hi Praveen, Which packages in Debian GNU/Hurd did you install to build golang- github-nsf-termbox-go? I can maybe try out the build to find out where it fials. Thanks! On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 22:34 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Package: gccgo-9 > Version: 9.3.0-9 > Severity: important >

Bug#956414: #956414: Upload a partially fixed version?

2020-04-12 Thread Svante Signell
Hi again, I saw that there was some complaints from lintian of the uploaded version. I've fixed some of them. Upload again? BTW: running lintian with the --pedantic flag does not show all issues as 956...@bugs.debian.org does. Which option(s) trigger all the output at the link? Thanks!

Bug#956414: RFS: eudev/3.2.9-7+debian1: [ITP] /dev/ and hotplug management daemon

2020-04-10 Thread Svante Signell
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eudev" * Package name: eudev Version : 3.2.9-7+debian1 Upstream Author : NA * URL : https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/eudev.git * License : GPL-2+ *

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >