Bug#1057270: libimager-perl: FTBFS: t/t10tiff.t failure

2023-12-02 Thread Tony Cook
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 08:35:38PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > >From > >https://sources.debian.org/src/libimager-perl/1.020%2Bdfsg-1/TIFF/imtiff.c/#L302 > > static toff_t sizeproc(thandle_t x) { > return 0; > } > > which is used as the TIFFClientOpen() argument in i_readtiff_wiol(): >

Bug#900739: crashing in toke.c, keyword plugin pointer is left pointing to an XS module that's been unloaded

2018-06-04 Thread Tony Cook
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:31:06PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Thanks for the detailed analysis both! Given that the fix is accidental, > and not in a released version of perl yet, I'm not sure whether this > belongs in a stable update. That said, maybe there is no more correct > place for

Bug#900739: crashing in toke.c, keyword plugin pointer is left pointing to an XS module that's been unloaded

2018-06-03 Thread Tony Cook
The underlying cause appears to be that libm is referencing _LIB_VERSION in libperl. I suspect the Oracle client libraries have dlopen()ed a library that depends on libm, and that isn't dlclosed() when mod_perl unloads DBD::Oracle. So the process that leads to the crash: 1) Apache starts it

Bug#847397: libimager-perl FTBFS on mips/mipsel: Failed 10/66 test programs

2016-12-08 Thread Tony Cook
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:01:01AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Fri, 09 Dec 2016 01:14:23 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > > > TL;dr: this is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176 > > Oh. > > > > > Otherwise a backtrace for a -g build from the crash would be handy: > > > > perl

Bug#847397: libimager-perl FTBFS on mips/mipsel: Failed 10/66 test programs

2016-12-07 Thread Tony Cook
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 10:27:33PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: libimager-perl > Version: 1.005+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libimager-perl=sid > > ... > Test Summary Report > --- > t/150-type/030-double.t (Wstat: 10

Bug#823481: libimager-perl: FTBFS: t/200-file/400-basic.t failure

2016-05-05 Thread Tony Cook
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:05:55AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > t/200-file/400-basic.t .. > 1..262 > [...] > # type gif > #opening Format: gif, options: file=>GIF/testimg/expected.gif > ok 69 # Imager=HASH(0x1b10430) > ok 70 # opening GIF/testimg/expected.gif > ok 71 # >

Bug#812093: libimager-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/65 test programs. 0/4481 subtests failed.

2016-01-21 Thread Tony Cook
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 07:11:01PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > Control: retitle -1 libgif7: DGifOpen() broken because it uses unallocated > memory uninitialized memory, not unallocated. Tony

Bug#812093: libimager-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/65 test programs. 0/4481 subtests failed.

2016-01-20 Thread Tony Cook
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:38:27PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 02:42:04PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Source: libimager-perl > > Version: 1.004+dfsg-1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: fails to build from source > > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org >

Bug#692979: Bug#693003: Bug#693002: libimager-perl: breaks libimager-qrcode-perl

2012-11-12 Thread Tony Cook
The only way I can see to fix this from my end is to have Imager build a separate libimager.so.ABI[1]. For that to be useful though, I suspect packagers would need to extract that libimager.so.ABI into a new package, which might be too much effort for such a minor package. I had planned to break

Bug#543079: libimager-perl: FTBFS: failed tests

2009-08-27 Thread Tony Cook
This bug reported against libtiff upstream appears to be the same issue: http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2088 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#543079: libimager-perl: FTBFS: failed tests

2009-08-23 Thread Tony Cook
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 06:47:53PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: t/t104ppm.ok t/t105gif.ok # Failed test 'reading multiple images from tiff' # at t/t106tiff.t line 315. Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at t/t106tiff.t line 318. Use of uninitialized

Bug#370651: Check it

2008-01-31 Thread Tony Cook
steinberg wavelab 5.01a - 49 coreldraw graphics suite 12 - 49 Type 'softnuhere. com' in your |E (w/o spaces and quotes) steinberg cubase sx 2.2.0.33 - 39 alias motionbuilder 6.0 - 49 parallels desktop 3.0 for mac - 29 alias motionbuilder 6.0 - 49 crystal reports professional edition 11 - 69

Bug#421582: libimager-perl 0.58 is now in incoming

2007-05-24 Thread Tony Cook
Hi Jay, On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 02:27:35AM -0400, Jay Bonci wrote: Hey Tony, Two things, I noticed the other day that you picked up a Sourceforge project for libimager-perl (sf.net/projects/imager-perl). I know these things because I approved the request :) Are you going to be moving

Bug#421582: CVE 2007-2413 or CVE 2007-2459

2007-05-15 Thread Tony Cook
It looks like both CVE 2007-2413 and CVE 2007-2459 have been assigned to this. The description in 2459 is inaccurate - there was certainly a bug in read_4bit_bmp(), but it could not be used to cause a buffer overflow - or none that I could see. -- Tony Imager maintainer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#421582: libimager-perl: buffer overflow when reading 8-bit compressed BMP files

2007-04-30 Thread Tony Cook
Package: libimager-perl Version: 0.50-1 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Justification: user security hole I'm the upstream maintainer for the Imager perl module. The BMP reader in Imager 0.56 and earlier can cause a memory overflow in a malloced() buffer when reading an 8-bit/pixel

Bug#359661: libimager-perl: 4 channel JPEGs can crash Imager when writing to a scalar

2006-03-28 Thread Tony Cook
be releasing Imager 0.50 shortly with a fix for this and 2 other minor problems in 0.49. I've attached a patch vs Imager 0.44 if you're looking at an update for stable. My dev tree already had a different fix for this problem, since io_glue_commit_types() had become a no-op. Tony Cook Imager

Bug#288272: Very slow on Toshiba Portege 7200

2005-01-17 Thread Tony Cook
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 03:33:28PM +0900, Horms wrote: If you have a moment could you please check to see if these packages, which will form the basis of 2.4.27-8, resolve your problem. http://debian.vergenet.net/testing/ This solved the speed problem for me too. Thank you Tony -- To