Hi, intrigeri <intrig...@debian.org> writes: >> I hope that upstream will port the code to GTK 3 in time for the >> Bullseye freeze :)
When I received your initial bug report, I followed the advice given in Perl's Gtk3 module documentation to "run s/Gtk2/Gtk3/ on [the] application." Unfortunately, that didn't work at all and I put it aside. > What do you think we should do? I can think of several options, > from the least drastic to the most: > > - File a Request For Help (RFH) bug against wnpp, in order to alert > users and fellow Debian people about the current situation. > > popcon suggests this package is still quite popular, so I have some > hope someone could volunteer :) > > - Orphan the package. > > - Remove the package from sid. With the experience of my first attempt to port TinyCA from Gtk2 to Gtk3 I was considering removing the package from Debian altogether. However, encouraged by your remark that, according to popcon, there seems to be some interest in TinyCA still, I took another shot and made some progress towards a Gtk3 port. In light of this, let me get back to this bug report in about two weeks and decide how to proceed. BTW, I keep the most up-to-date copy of the TinyCA source on Salsa (https://salsa.debian.org/cpt_nemo-guest/tinyca). Regards Uli
