Hi,
2011/5/27 Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org:
there's a wishlist bug on tmail for a year, and you haven't touched
the package since 2008. Are you still interested in active
maintainership of it? If not I can move it under pkg-ruby-extras group
maintenance. If yes, I'll just NMU the package
2010/8/26 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net:
That worked fine until Ruby 1.9.1, but apparently a change in Ruby
1.9.2 broke Rubygems 1.3.7. This is exhibited by two bugs:
[...]
- rubygems doesn't work:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588125
I trace the following error:
Hi,
The existing ruby package simply sticks a symlink into /usr/bin/ruby
to point to ruby1.8. I was surprised to find that this was not
using the alternatives system, so that you can manage this yourself.
I have a rough idea about ruby* packages.
ruby package:
now:
provides
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: akira yamada ak...@debian.org
* Package name: ruby1.9.1
Version : 1.9.1
Upstream Author : Yukihiro Matsumoto m...@netlab.jp
* URL : http://www.ruby-lang.org/
* License : Ruby's
Programming Lang: C
Description
Hi,
Thanks for the follow-up. Quantlib (upstream) and I figured out a workaround.
In previous versions we had gotten by without the configure step -- and hence
no Makefile was created and present. That did not seem to upset earlier
versions but it set up the current versions. Switching to
Hi,
Now, however, using what is in unstable, ie
Get:33 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main libruby1.8 1.8.7.173-1 [1679kB]
Get:34 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main ruby1.8 1.8.7.173-1 [290kB]
Get:35 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main ruby 4.2 [20.6kB]
Get:36
Hi,
I know there's a freeze on new upstream version entering unstable, but
with the pending release of Ruby 1.9.1 in a couple of months, it would
be really useful to get the pre-release into experimental so we can play
with it.
I already made prototype of ruby1.9_1.9.1~rc1 and
Hi,
Can someone please comment on the status of a fix for this bug in
Etch?
We are working on our svn-repos.
Thank you.
--
ay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
After upgrading from ruby1.8_1.8.6.114-2 to ruby1.8_1.8.7-2, I noticed a rails
webapp called Tracks v1.6, stopped working.
The error is as mentioned in the subject line. Steps to reproduce:
- download http://www.rousette.org.uk/projects/files/tracks-current.zip
- unzip, and configure
Hi,
Such a layout only makes sense if someone want to coinstall ruby 1.9.0 and
ruby
1.9.1: if we have only one dir (for 1.9), then won't be able to install two
versions of the same lib (one for 1.9.0, one for 1.9.1). On the other hand, if
a lib was ported to 1.9.0, it's likely to be easy to
Package: uim-tcode
Version: 1:1.5.1-1
Severity: important
uim-tcode should provide tutcode-custom.scm, tutcode-bushudic.scm and
tutcode-rule.scm in /usr/share/uim.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers oldstable
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'),
Hi,
According to a discussion thread on Google's ruby-talk [1], there are a
couple serious bugs in Ruby's thread implementation.
Please provide precise pointers to the bugs (or code to reproduce them).
The mailing list thread you are pointing to is very old, and only
contains vague
Package: libtokyocabinet-dev
Version: 1.1.10-1
Severity: normal
libtokyocabinet-dev does not provide tcadb.h.
$ dpkg --listfiles libtokyocabinet-dev | fgrep .h
/usr/include/tcbdb.h
/usr/include/tchdb.h
/usr/include/tcutil.h
$ dpkg-query -W libtokyocabinet-dev
libtokyocabinet-dev
Hi,
upstream ruby removed file version.h . But we already have lots of fixes
based on string RUBY_VERSION_CODE, so it's easier to recreate this
version.h for ruby1.9 package. This patch fix this bug.
It also fix another bug introduced by ruby1.9 upstream changes.
Basically, we should not
Hi,
this bug was marked pending quite some time ago now.
Any news for this one?
I made new packages and sent them to Debian security team.
I'm waiting for DSA...
Thank you.
--
ay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
Package: ruby1.8
Version: 1.8.5-4
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for ruby1.8.
CVE-2007-5770[0]:
| The (1) Net::ftptls, (2) Net::telnets, (3) Net::imap, (4) Net::pop,
| and (5) Net::smtp libraries in
Hi,
At least the telnets code in ruby1.8 (unstable) is not
fixed. Do I miss anything?
The fix is in net/telnets.rb.
137 if @options['VerifyMode'] != OpenSSL::SSL::VERIFY_NONE
138@sock.post_connection_check(@options['Host'])
139 end
Thank
It's not:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:tmp$] LC_ALL=C apt-get source ruby1.8
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Need to get 4593kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://debian.netcologne.de unstable/main ruby1.8 1.8.6.111-2 (dsc)
[1061B]
Get:2
Hi,
There was a similar bug that will be fixed in ruby 1.8.7 in
Matrix#inverse.
See discussion at
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?group_id=426atid=1698func=detailaid=9360
Also, I've opened a bug on the ruby bug tracker about this issue. See
Hi,
It is my intention to NMU libshadow-ruby to fix this problem in the next few
days, unless a maintainer upload or some other responses to this bug report
is made.
Thank you for your attention.
I uploaded new package which includes the patch to Debian.
--
ay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
# This is changes of ruby1.9, so Bug#441489 is of libinotify-ruby.
reassign 441489 libinotify-ruby
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ruby1.8
Version: 1.8.6-2
dpkg-build -rfakeroot fails if byacc is not installed. As 'byacc' is
not listed as a build-dependency in debian/control, building fails.
ruby1.8 build-depends on bison and it does not use bison.
Please show me your build log.
(Logs at
I don't understand how 'bison' is involved here. The binary file
'byacc' is in package 'byacc', not in package 'bison'.
We make ruby1.8 package use biosn and not byacc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/downloads/ruby$ sudo pbuilder build ruby1.8_1.8.6-2.dsc
[...]
The following NEW packages will be
the README file.
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Please follow up this discussion in 399706. I agree Ruby is stupid
here, but I don't intend to work around it.
I don't think so.
It is not a bug of Ruby and it is bug of apt-listbugs.
I think that the behaviour is intended by the upstream author of SOAP4r.
The current
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: akira yamada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libdb4.4-ruby
Version : 0.5.8
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Programming Lang: C, Ruby
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
We're planning to remove ruby1.6 from etch release. See
http://wiki.debian.org/RemoveRuby16 and recent discussion on debian-ruby
lists.
It is the time to remove ruby1.6 itself. Please remove ruby1.6 from
testing and unstable.
Thanks,
-- System
Daniel Schepler wrote:
Makefile:143: *** missing separator. Stop.
Does the line 143 contain |#_!!_#|?
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please remove ruby-manual package from testing/unstable.
Reason:
This package provides a manual and a FAQs of only Ruby 1.4.x.
And new upstream version is not provided.
The version 1.4.x is very old
Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
Package: libhonyaku-damashii-ruby1.6
Version: 0.20-4
We're planning to remove ruby 1.6 from etch [1].
Please consider to ugprade to ruby 1.8 or remove this package from
testing and unstable.
I will reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org to request removing it from
must be accompanied
by a verbatim copy of its copyright and distribution license
in the file `/usr/share/doc/package/copyright'.
So, we will add a note of this fact in copyright
and close this bug.
--
akira yamada
that it is not a serious bug.
--
akira yamada
is distributed with dual-license which is Ruby's License or GPL.
URL:http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt
--
akira yamada
tk' from irb1.8
I could not reproduce the problem.
$ irb1.8
irb(main):001:0 require tk
= true
Please send me another reproduceable code.
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/yaml.rb:133:in `load'
from /usr/bin/raggle:4795:in `load_config'
from /usr/bin/raggle:5441:in `main'
from /usr/bin/raggle:6461
I posted a workaround to ruby-core list:
URL:http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/6159
--
akira yamada
Martin Pitt wrote:
There is a safe mode bypass in all Ruby versions:
I already prepared the new package and
sent a notice to security team.
But I cannot yet get DSA
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
ruby1.8_1.8.3-1 is in unstable. please try it.
If you get SEGV with 1.8.3-1, please send the backtrace.
Thank you.
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Please remove libdb4.1-ruby from sid/testing.
Because libdb4.1 is obsoleted.
URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01570.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),
to configure the package.
cd $(BUILD_TREE) autoconf
cd $(BUILD_TREE) \
On i386, ruby1.6 uses /usr/lib/ruby/1.6/i386-linux for
searching arch-depends-libraries. But this patch changes
the dir to i386-linux-gnu. It is wrong.
Is this change necessary for GNU/kFreeBSD?
--
akira yamada
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdb2-ruby1.9
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Description : Interface to Berkeley DB 2 for Ruby 1.9
BDB is an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdb4.2-ruby1.9
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Description : Interface to Berkeley DB 4.2 for Ruby 1.9
BDB
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdb4.3-ruby1.9
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Description : Interface to Berkeley DB 4.3 for Ruby 1.9
BDB
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdb4.1-ruby1.9
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Description : Interface to Berkeley DB 4.1 for Ruby 1.9
BDB
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdb3-ruby1.9
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Description : Interface to Berkeley DB 3 for Ruby 1.9
BDB is an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdb4.3-ruby
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Description : Interface to Berkeley DB 4.3 for Ruby
BDB is an
Package: alexandria
(BVersion: 0.5.1-2
(BSeverity: important
(B
(BIn LANG=ja, Alexandria crashes at alexandria/ui/main_app.rb:125.
(B
(B $ LANG=ja LC_TIME=C alexandria
(B ---
(B Alexandria just crashed
(B ---
(B Timestamp: Fri Apr 08 17:54:10
Klaus Stein wrote:
Package: libtk-ruby1.8
Version: 1.8.1-7woody1
I think that this bug(?) is not for Debian.
Debian does not have libtk-ruby1.8_1.8.1-7woody1.
Thank you.
--
akira yamada URL:http://arika.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
precisely
fixed the problem.
Does Debian ruby1.8 use vanilla ruby 1.8.2 at the moment or a patched
pre-version?
Tha changes of drb/drb.rb is for security.
So I think that we should use current drb/drb.rb.
--
akira yamada URL:http://arika.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
48 matches
Mail list logo
