Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2019-01-13 Thread drake763
Thanks again for your quick and detailed response! On 1/13/19 2:49 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Now, dkms run on amd64 produces binaries for *amd64* architecture, and if you > run the same command > on i386 you will produce kernel modules that can run only on *i386* > architecture In my u

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2019-01-13 Thread drake763
ld be the debian way to deal with such bugs? Of course, these issues shall not reopen this bug, it's just things that are unclear on my side. Again thank you very much. All best On 1/2/19 4:28 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:17:32 +0100 dra

Bug#884658: dkms: Should really depends on dpkg-dev for dpkg-architecture

2018-12-04 Thread drake763
Hi, If I'm not mistaken, the aforementioned patch [1] that introduced the dpkg-architecture usage is also responsible for this debian dkms bug [2]. In the bug report for [2] there is a patch provided, but apparently this has not yet been fixed in stable or testing/sid. As a user, I'd be really g

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2018-12-03 Thread drake763
Hi, I'd also second the request to patch this bug. This bug is not present in upstream but only in debian and thus ubuntu. It was introduced in debian specific patch [1]. The part of Pierre's patch mentioned in this thread would fix this and it would be highly appreciated if at least the relevant