Control: reassign -1 manpages-l10n
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
I think with these new recipes in place, we should be able
to disable cap-ram completely by default.
Comments/objections?
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
mits (very small disk).
So we should not value this too high...
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
ue is also fixed now.
Maybe you want to give it a try.
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 06:17:49PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> holger@osuosl4-amd64:/srv/data/holger/devscripts$ ./scripts/debrebuild.pl
> --builder=sbuild+unshare ../codespell_2.3.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
< h01ger> josch: i believe i found the condition to trigger #1081047: have the
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.23.7+MR415
Severity: normal
Dear josch,
when trying to run
debrebuild --builder=sbuild+unshare --cache=./cache/ --buildresult=./results/
./yq_3.4.3-1_amd64.buildinfo
it failed with probably this being relevant part of the logfile,
the full log is below.
E: Unabl
pushed into git.
Thanks
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
touch this
setting for the next upload.
I guess it might get a difficult discussion, to get this setting changed.
Thus I would like to upload the status quo, so people get this into the
official images with the possibility for wide testing, and then we will
go the next step...
Holger
--
Sent
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sun, 8 Sep 2024 11:53:28 +0200):
> On 30/08/2024 at 13:32, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >>>>> Am 27. August 2024 23:46:41 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg
> >>>>> :
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
The html files no longer exist in upstream tarball,
so this bug can be closed.
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Control: retitle -1 RFA ddcci-driver-linux -- DDC/CI driver
Fix bug title (maintains intends to orphan this package)
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Control: reassign -1 plasma-discover
thanks
Re-assign to the correct package.
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
:
holger@osuosl4-amd64:/srv/data/holger/devscripts$ ./scripts/debrebuild.pl
--builder=sbuild+unshare ../codespell_2.3.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
[...]
127.0.0.1 - - [07/Sep/2024 16:28:49] "GET
/./python3-setuptools-scm_8.1.0-1_all.deb HTTP/1.1" 200 -
127.0.0.1 - - [07/Sep/2024 16:28:49] "
less load on snapshot.debian.org, this fails for me:
holger@osuosl4-amd64:/srv/data/holger/devscripts$ export
http_proxy="http://localhost:3128";
holger@osuosl4-amd64:/srv/data/holger/devscripts$ ./scripts/debrebuild.pl
--builder=sbuild+unshare ../codespell_2.3.0-1_amd64
early:
holger@osuosl4-amd64:/srv/data/holger/devscripts$ ./scripts/debrebuild.pl
--builder=sbuild+unshare ../codespell_2.3.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
../codespell_2.3.0-1_amd64.buildinfo containes a GPG signature which has NOT
been validated
Using defined Build-Path: /build/codespell-2.3.0
I: obtaining
Hi,
Am 30. August 2024 11:36:28 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg
:
>On 29/08/2024 at 22:12, Holger Wansing wrote:
>> Am 29. August 2024 20:25:05 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg
>> :
>>> On 28/08/2024 at 18:43, Holger Wansing wrote:
>>>> Am 27. August 2024 2
Hi,
Am 29. August 2024 20:25:05 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg
:
>On 28/08/2024 at 18:43, Holger Wansing wrote:
>> Am 27. August 2024 23:46:41 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg
>> :
>>
>>>>> Looking at partman-auto-lvm code more closely, it seems that the lvmok
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 07:53:33PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 cconfirmed
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Was seid
do list.
>
>Fine, but what do we do with the small_disk recipe now ?
What about simply activating it for LVM as well?
Not the natural choice for this sort of recipe - of course, but the easiest
one, and the recipe stays consistent with all the others (to be used for
non-LVM and LVM).
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Hi again,
Am 27. August 2024 21:47:14 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg
:
>On 27/08/2024 at 12:42, Holger Wansing wrote:
>>
>> And I did some tests again; the results are at [2].
>> To give a short summary: the results are really really great !!!
>> (I tested all defau
Hi Pascal,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:49:27
+0200):
> On 26/08/2024 at 08:34, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >> If you provide the minimum disk size required to reach /boot maximum
> >> size, I can adjust the priority accordingly.
> >
> > I think 25G
Am 26. August 2024 00:33:48 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg
:
>On 25/08/2024 at 22:48, Holger Wansing wrote:
>>>>> (960 MB, sorry)
>>>
>>> Wow, what makes it so much bigger than the 12.6 netinst image (662MB) ?
>>
>> That's a follo
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sun, 25 Aug 2024 22:03:28
+0200):
> On 25/08/2024 at 19:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> >> I have prepared a netinst image for testing now with both above mentioned
> >> MRs:
> >> https://people.debian.org/~holgerw/d-i__new
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote (Sun, 25 Aug 2024 16:53:28 +0200):
> I have prepared a netinst image for testing now with both above mentioned MRs:
> https://people.debian.org/~holgerw/d-i__new-limits_and_fix-envelope-calculation/
> (960 MB, sorry)
Screenshots from tests with 4 different d
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote (Sun, 25 Aug 2024 13:09:32 +0200):
> Hi,
>
> Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sat, 24 Aug 2024 20:48:39
> +0200):
> > On 23/08/2024 at 17:52, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > >
> > > @Pascal: Would you be able to provide a merge request for th
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sat, 24 Aug 2024 20:48:39
+0200):
> On 23/08/2024 at 17:52, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> > @Pascal: Would you be able to provide a merge request for this in
> > partman-auto-lvm, please?
>
> After fixing a few typo's and min
Hi,
Am 23. August 2024 00:15:44 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg
:
>On 22/08/2024 at 17:19, Holger Wansing wrote:
>> Pascal Hambourg wrote (Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:59:12
>> +0200):
>>> On 19/08/2024 à 07:50, Holger Wansing wrote:
>>>> Am 18. August 2024 2
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:59:12
+0200):
> On 19/08/2024 à 07:50, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Am 18. August 2024 21:50:53 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg
> > :
> >>
> >>> I wonder, if we could grow up the root partition in "separate /ho
eam
control: tags -2 + upstream
control: tags -3 + upstream
thanks
Hi gregor,
> I have 926 new signature which gnupg did not give me? Oh well.
*g* & many thanks for the bug reports! Please keep them coming! ;)
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproduc
I guess we should tag this bug "upstream" and "wontfix"?
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Homelessness exists not because the housing systemn
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:46:13
+0200):
> On 18/08/2024 at 16:38, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> > I have uploaded some screenshots from tests with different disk sizes to
> > https://people.debian.org/~holgerw/partman-auto___new-limits/
>
> Tha
r "allow to install and use a minimal (non-graphical) system
>within [TBD] GB disk space".
>Should the "small_disk" recipes be resurrected ?
I wasn't aware of such recipes, but what could be the benefit?
On such small disks you will best choose the atomic recipe, or
partition manually.
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote (Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:55:03 +0200):
> Am 18. August 2024 16:38:30 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing
> :
> >
> >1.
> >I'm unable to produce swap partition bigger than 1G, even in a qemu VM with
> >2G or 4G of RAM
> >('cat /proc/me
Am 18. August 2024 16:38:30 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing :
>
>1.
>I'm unable to produce swap partition bigger than 1G, even in a qemu VM with
>2G or 4G of RAM
>('cat /proc/meminfo' has "MemTotal = 2021952 kB" for example, when I start
>qemu
>w
efore shrinks root. I'm not sure, what's best here...
I have uploaded some screenshots from tests with different disk sizes to
https://people.debian.org/~holgerw/partman-auto___new-limits/
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
source: diffoscope
severity: serious
justification: kaboom
forwarded: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/389
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 07:10:45AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 09:08:27PM +, FC (Fay) Stegerman (@obfusk) wrote:
> >
Hi arm people,
could you please comment on this bug, please?
<https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078871>
Is there a need for some change?
Many thanks
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Am 17. August 2024 14:22:39 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg
:
>Shouldn't this bug be advertised in debian-...@lists.debian.org so that people
>familiar with ARM platforms are aware of it ?
Indeed, I intended to do so, but forgot then.
Thanks
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Forward to the correct bug
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Diederik de Haas
Gesendet: 17. August 2024 13:17:18 MESZ
An: Pascal Hambourg , Holger Wansing
, 1076...@bugs.debian.org, Philip Hands
CC: "José Ángel Pastrana" , Vagrant Cascadian
Betreff: Bug#1076952: [RF
A summary from https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076952#65
and follow-ups:
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Looks like another incarnation of
> <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=+770666>
>
> @vagrant:
> is this stil
Package: partman-auto
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 00:47:22 +0200
From: "Diederik de Haas"
To: "Pascal Hambourg" , <1076...@bugs.debian.org>,
"Philip Hands" , "Holger Wansing"
Cc: José Ángel Pastrana , "Vagrant Cascadian"
Subject: Re: Bug
ion has stalled, maybe it would be good, to have something,
that people can test?
Pascal, would you be able to form the proposed changes as they are currently
into code for a patch or a merge request, maybe for amd64 only, for now?
The details would be mostly as you stated in your first proposal, AFAICS.
Thanks
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
version: 1:13+2024.05.15
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
If it feels like we’re breaking climate records every year, it’s because we are.
e(s) for ARM devices would
>reserve the first 16MB automatically with plain partitioning.
>
>[1] https://wiki.pine64.org/wiki/ROCK64_Software_Releases#Debian
>[2] https://opensource.rock-chips.com/wiki_Partitions
Looks like another incarnation of
<https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=+770666>
@vagrant:
is this still (or again) an issue?
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
much for disks
>> larger than 1TB, say, as then its a small enough proportion to be no
>> loss even if people don't use it for grml.
>
>It is at least possible. The PRIORITY value in recipes represents a "scaling
>factor", in a rather convoluted way.
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
t this error gets
> fixed?
yes.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
https://showyourstripes.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
etimes
this might be the case, but sometimes also not. dev-ref can be a link
collection,
can point or include best practices, can list more than one way to do it etc.
to put it dffierently: dev-ref is not about whether something is legal, but
whether
it's sensible to do.
-
ike
these
are present anymore.
just saying, for next time? ;)
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Climate Justice is that moment when we can start looking each other
package: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp
severity: serious
justification: prevent package from entering trixie
forwarded: -1 https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-octopus-librnp/-/issues/110
thanks
meta data says it all.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible
Hi,
Am 8. August 2024 08:16:03 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg
:
>On 07/08/2024 at 20:33, Holger Wansing wrote:
>>
>> A recipe specific for server installations, which limits the swap to let's
>> say 1G or 2G, because the machine has enough RAM built-in.
>
>What
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Wed, 7 Aug 2024 17:47:42 +0200):
> On 05/08/2024 at 17:47, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there an intended use case for built-in recipes ?
> >> Should there be different recipes for different uses cases ?
> >> E.g.:
> &g
ng this.
ack, will do.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Society: Be Yourself!
Society: No, not like that.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
~rc3-3 makes /tmp a tmpfs by default unless a mount is
> explicitly defined. It means that atomic and home recipes do not need to
> allocate space for /tmp in / any more. But on the other hand they may
> need to raise the minimum swap size because tmpfs can use swap space
> under memory pressure.
> Should the multi recipes stop creating a /tmp partition for consistency
> with other recipes ?
Dont't know.
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
tion-guide (attached),
> > mostly a removal of outdated / no longer needed information.
>
> Much better!
>
> It may be possible to improve/extend the information further, but that could
> happen another time (too).
> The real problematic parts are gone now, so thank
gt; Marked as found in versions partman-auto/166.
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Control: reassign -1 partman-auto
Control: found -1 166
Control: tags -1 + pending
A merge request has just been merged, to increase /boot default size to 1G,
so we could close this bug on this.
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
6582>
> <https://bugs.debian.org/1076539>
> <https://bugs.debian.org/1076695>
>
> > Please consider raising the default size for this partition.
>
> Work in progress, see
> <https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-auto/-/merge_requests/13>.
contents. It seems that initramfs-tools
> 0.143, currently in experimental, fixes the issue.
>
> Other related bug reports:
> <https://bugs.debian.org/1076582>
> <https://bugs.debian.org/1076539>
> <https://bugs.debian.org/972396>
>
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Control: found -1 166
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Wenbin Lv wrote:
> In https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/releasenotes , translation of
> "Galician" is missing from any version other than English.
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057288
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508
IOS newer than around
> >1995–98"
> >- - Seeing the word "cylinder" all over the place ...
> >- - "CHS translation mode (“Large”)" = Cylinder/Head/Sector I presume?
> >
> >At that point I fell off my chair :-O
> >
> >Or as I phrased
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 partman-auto
Control: retitle -2 partman-auto: please increase default size of /boot
Diederik de Haas wrote (Sat, 20 Jul 2024 19:10:20
+0200):
> On Saturday, 20 July 2024 17:07:18 CEST Holger Wansing wrote:
> > This bug seems firstly a docu
Hi,
Am 20. Juli 2024 19:10:20 MESZ schrieb Diederik de Haas :
>On Saturday, 20 July 2024 17:07:18 CEST Holger Wansing wrote:
>> This bug seems firstly a documentation issue, but one could also argue,
>> that there's another topic with the /boot partition being to small these
another topic with the /boot partition being to small these days
in the light of bigger initrds due to firmware includes etc.
So, before changing the doc, we should first evaluate, if the default size
should be increased.
Thoughts?
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
g/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774843 seems
> to incorporate it.
nice, many thanks for reporting this here. Could you maybe create a
patch/commit/MR/foo too? :)
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09
ailable. (all running bookworm and
munin 2.0.73)
> Are you aware of recent changes in stable that might have caused the issue
> in munin? Do you know workarounds?
sorry, no.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8B
e case of two programs
> having the same functionality but different implementations is handled
> via "alternatives" or the "Conflicts" mechanism. See
> :ref:`s-maintscripts` and
seconded & thanks for this!
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
over.
Did the situation improve noteworthy in the past year?
Maybe synaptic is the better alternative ...
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
he CSS query worked".
I can reproduce this issue here on Debian bookworm, which has sphinx
version 5.3.0 included, while the developers-reference package is getting
built on unstable with sphinx version 7.3.x.
I guess, this does not confirm the thesis of a regression?
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
sting first, before
> adding DEP-17 changes on top of them?
I have just applied Helmut's patch (with a small adaption due to the
"No longer build kfreebsd packages" commits) to git.
Intend to wait for 1.229 to migrate to testing, before uploading.
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 07:18:18PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 06:46:21PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > subject says it all, one was freshly installed with bookworm, the other
> > was upgraded. both don't use backports. happy to give more data.
t
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme/issues/880
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Hi Holger,
On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 09:25:38PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> This has already been filed as an issue in sphinx' github project in 2020:
> <https://github.com/readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme/issues/880>
> I will mark this bug as forwarded to that github issue l
x' github project in 2020:
<https://github.com/readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme/issues/880>
I will mark this bug as forwarded to that github issue later.
Holger
On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 06:46:21PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> subject says it all, one was freshly installed with bookworm, the other
> was upgraded. both don't use backports. happy to give more data.
as per Debian's defaults, I'm also running apparmor on these systems,
hi,
subject says it all, one was freshly installed with bookworm, the other
was upgraded. both don't use backports. happy to give more data.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF02
thanks. We have discussed this enough and we have *implemented* the
changes, why should we again discuss whether we want that change?
> Thanks for considering
Many thanks for all your fantastic work here, Helmut!
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reprod
implemented in
<https://salsa.debian.org/debian/slm/-/commit/25db5849a9e231c1616aa3795ea8608d6b29b0d2>
however in
<https://salsa.debian.org/debian/slm/-/commit/8ba49b000ce2cda06eb2002eec6f901890d80492>
the file was then completely overridden with a po file from kwartz-client.
So, there
eassigned without further comment or title adjusted, but increased severity...
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
I too often read "The planet is dying! 😱" It
istics on the Debian website.
Please use the file from
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073510#15
to fix this issue.
Thanks for your time
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
ian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/commit/3e2ac8dc08386129740e80877f8d04404082b496
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Package: xfce4-power-manager
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi maintainer,
attached is a manpage for xfce4-pm-helper script, which is currently missing
from your package.
Please consider including it.
Thanks for your time
So long
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Finterprint: 496A C6E8 1442
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
"The two hardest problems in computer science are: (i) people, (ii), convincing
computer scientists that the hardest problem in computer
variants of that files in the minified-js folder,
so I'm not sure, if this approach is do-able at all ...
Thanks for your time
So long
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Finterprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
else would happen tomorrow).
I'm in the process of updating to sequoia-chameleon-gnupg 0.10.0, but
this needs some trivial newer dependencies which just needs some
(little) time, which we now have without risking to break things in
trixie.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi, you may have noticed that we have an 'official' Debian-style html
> theme for Sphinx-based manuals on the Debian website now. It can
> be seen at debian-policy under https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
> It was created by Stéphane Blo
lude the search.html from the tests with
-Xsearch.html
or
-Xdebian/developers-reference/usr/share/developers-reference/search.html
as stated in the manpage.
So, the exclude function seems somewhat buggy.
Thanks for your time
So long
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Finterprint:
Control: reopen -1
Control: tags -1 patch
Just to clarify, the original report mentiones two changes required for
systemd 256:
| 1. systemd 256 makes /usr read-only in initrd:
|- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/32511
|- https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/issues/253
|
| 2
Source: dracut
Version: 060+5-8
Followup-For: Bug #1071182
Tags: patch
The following patch addresses the case where /usr and possibly /etc are
mounted read-only in the initrd, and therefore fixes the error messsages
mentioned in my previous email.
From: Holger Weiss
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024
ble
> to figure out with which of the two differing bash packages the sources were
> compiled.
I've checked all .buildinfo files to see how big the impact of this problem
is:
holger@ionos7-amd64:/var/ …
tent/reproducible/debian/ftp-master.debian.org/buildinfo $ for i in amd64 arm64
arm
Package: dracut
Followup-For: Bug #1071182
After updating to systemd 256~rc3-2 and dracut 060+5-8, these two
messages are logged from initrd:
| /bin/dracut-cmdline: 28: //lib/dracut/hooks/cmdline/00-parse-root.sh: cannot
create
/lib/dracut/hooks/initqueue/finished/devexists-\x2fdev\x2fdisk\x2fb
No progress for the last 7 years :-(
I have just updated the sponsors list manually for now.
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Thomas Lange wrote:
> I wonder if this bug is still valid?
The discrepancies spotted by Paul in
<https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=442083#30>
are still there, so this is valid.
Just apply the patch and see how it goes?
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Am 24. Mai 2024 20:16:35 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing :
>
>
>Am 24. Mai 2024 20:10:35 MESZ schrieb Thomas Lange :
>>>>>>> On Fri, 24 May 2024 20:02:35 +0200, Holger Wansing
>>>>>>> said:
>>
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
Am 24. Mai 2024 20:10:35 MESZ schrieb Thomas Lange :
>>>>>> On Fri, 24 May 2024 20:02:35 +0200, Holger Wansing
>>>>>> said:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>> you fixed this in master branch.
>> Are you sure about this?
>> I
Hi Thomas,
you fixed this in master branch.
Are you sure about this?
I somehow seem to remember, that debian-master branch is used for packages.d.o
...
Holger
Von:Thomas Lange
An:1071739-done@bugs.debian.orgGesendet:Fri May 24
19:31:01 GMT+02:00 2024Betreff:Bug#1071739 fixed in
:
["480E51BAFB08CB4175CC91B15072D036AC583520",
"B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D091AB856069AAA1C"]
debsign: gpg error occurred! Aborting
I suppose this is not a rare configuration.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF
lead to
>https://www.debian.org/doc/ddp.
>
>It looks like there are possibly more broken links, among other to
>alioth.debian.org.
>So generally it might be a good idea to regularly run a broken link checker
>over all docs.
The issue is in the documentation package, not on the website; reassign to
harden-doc.
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
termine which file, comparator or external tool was being run when
> diffoscope invoked the ire of the oom-killer.
I'm not sure how --debug output should survive, but you mean just running
diffoscope with an added --debug option?
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(d
lled by the OOM killer.
is basically all I see.
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/artifacts/r00t-me/trixie_i386_dasel_tmp-kqFaQ/
is maybe working as in crashing for you?
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8
1 - 100 of 4199 matches
Mail list logo
