On Sat, 25 Dec 2021 at 09:40:33 +1100, undef wrote:
> I'll take a look at those commits early in the new year and
> see whether upstream is interested in them. They certainly look helpful for
> tracking this one down.
Also see https://salsa.debian.org/smcv/osk-sdl/-/commits/debug-for-1001809
for
Hi Simon,
See https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/issues/5136 for further analysis.
osk-sdl maintainers: you might want to consider applying and/or upstreaming
some of the "test: ..." commits from
https://gitlab.com/smcv/osk-sdl/-/commits/reproduce-sdl-regression to
improve the ability to debug
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/issues/5136
On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 18:23:35 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The osk-sdl autopkgtest on ci.debian.net seems to show a regression when
> run with libsdl2 (>= 2.0.18)
...
> This could be either a regression in libsdl2, or a
Source: osk-sdl, libsdl2
Control: found -1 libsdl2/2.0.18-3
Control: found -1 osk-sdl/0.66-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks
The osk-sdl autopkgtest on ci.debian.net seems to show a regression when
run
4 matches
Mail list logo
