severity 1002789 serious
thanks
Hello. This bug has been hidden for me because the package
had a missing build-dependency on tzdata (#1031362). Such bug
is now reassigned to libpython3.11-stdlib, where it probably belongs.
Now, when I build the package in bookworm using a chroot with
tzdata inst
Control: severity -1 important
Can't reproduce ...
On 14/02/22 at 16:34 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 2/14/22 14:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 14/02/22 at 14:35 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > > Hi Lucas,
> > >
> > > Please find, attached, the diff of the build log as you asked.
> > > Your thoughts?
> >
> > It's not the same version, are
On 2/14/22 14:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 14/02/22 at 14:35 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi Lucas,
Please find, attached, the diff of the build log as you asked.
Your thoughts?
It's not the same version, are there any relevant differences?
Lucas
It's the same version. I just do "dch -i -m
On 14/02/22 at 14:35 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Please find, attached, the diff of the build log as you asked.
> Your thoughts?
It's not the same version, are there any relevant differences?
Lucas
Hi Thomas,
On 29/12/21 at 12:07 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> I wasn't able to reproduce the FTBFS. I'm using a normal sbuild
> environment, so I don't see what's different from your build. Any clue?
As suggested in the bug report, can you start by diffing your build log
with mine
Hi Lucas,
I wasn't able to reproduce the FTBFS. I'm using a normal sbuild
environment, so I don't see what's different from your build. Any clue?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Source: python-pycdlib
Version: 1.12.0+ds1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: E
8 matches
Mail list logo
