Bug#1002831: ITP: lsb-release-minimal -- minimal shell implementation of lsb_release

2021-12-29 Thread Gioele Barabucci
On 29/12/21 19:37, Thorsten Glaser wrote: On Wed, 29 Dec 2021, Gioele Barabucci wrote: Instead of using LSB packages, this version of `lsb_release` uses the information in `/etc/os-release`. Nevertheless, the output of this version is /etc/os-release DOES NOT contain enough information for ls

Bug#1002831: ITP: lsb-release-minimal -- minimal shell implementation of lsb_release

2021-12-29 Thread Patrice Duroux
Hi, Just my 2 cents on that: > VERSION_ID=unstable Already in an issue to base-files: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931197 > VERSION_CODENAME=sid Does this have been/have-to-be reported to base-files? But regarding 'man os-release', they are both optional, isn't it? Reg

Bug#1002831: ITP: lsb-release-minimal -- minimal shell implementation of lsb_release

2021-12-29 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021, Gioele Barabucci wrote: > Instead of using LSB packages, this version of `lsb_release` uses the > information in `/etc/os-release`. Nevertheless, the output of this version is /etc/os-release DOES NOT contain enough information for lsb_release: (sid-amd64)tglase@tglase:~ $ c

Bug#1002831: ITP: lsb-release-minimal -- minimal shell implementation of lsb_release

2021-12-29 Thread Gioele Barabucci
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-init-divers...@chiark.greenend.org.uk * Package name: lsb-release-minimal Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Gioele Barabucci * URL : https://gioele.io/lsb-release-minimal * License : ISC Programming Lang: