Il 10/01/2022 12:38, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
On 09.01.22 22:00, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Il 08/01/2022 13:15, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
a.out should be excluded. Please do not forget to add a +dfsg suffix
to the upstream version.
first time I do a repack in many years (if I remember
On 09.01.22 22:00, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Il 08/01/2022 13:15, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
a.out should be excluded. Please do not forget to add a +dfsg suffix to the
upstream version.
first time I do a repack in many years (if I remember correctly), seems ok from a fast look but if
you want
Il 08/01/2022 13:15, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 21:47:49 +0100 Fabio Fantoni
wrote:
Il 07/01/2022 21:24, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
> On 07.01.22 21:10, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
>> I did wrong to do a QA upload?
>
> No, a QA upload is fine. But the maintainer should be kept
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 21:47:49 +0100 Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Il 07/01/2022 21:24, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
> On 07.01.22 21:10, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
>> I did wrong to do a QA upload?
>
> No, a QA upload is fine. But the maintainer should be kept "Debian QA
> Group" to
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Il 07/01/2022 21:24, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
On 07.01.22 21:10, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
I did wrong to do a QA upload?
No, a QA upload is fine. But the maintainer should be kept "Debian QA
Group" to be formally correct.
Ah... sry, I saw only now the mistake of not merging debian/control
On 07.01.22 21:10, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
I did
wrong to do a QA upload?
No, a QA upload is fine. But the maintainer should be kept "Debian QA Group" to
be formally correct.
Il 07/01/2022 20:53, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Please remove this tag when you have provided a fixed version (keeping
-1 revision no).
On 07.01.22 20:13, Bastian Germann wrote:
I suppose you should ITA the package. Want to take this responsibility?
Changes
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Please remove this tag when you have provided a fixed version (keeping -1
revision no).
On 07.01.22 20:13, Bastian Germann wrote:
I suppose you should ITA the package. Want to take this responsibility?
Changes since the last upload:
memtest86+ (5.31b-1)
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 14:11:21 +0100 Fabio Fantoni wrote:
New upstream beta version (with relevant additions and fixes), also got
fixes from coreboot, fedora, suse, gentoo, ubuntu, made further
additions and improvements to packaging, readme and grub2 configuration,
I also did some tests on PCs
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "memtest86+":
* Package name : memtest86+
Version : 5.31b-1
Upstream Author : Samuel Demeulemeester
* URL : http://www.memtest.org/
* License : GPL-2
11 matches
Mail list logo
