Ben, I wonder why you merged #1042237 and #1003965. The BPF messages coincide
in the almost empty lines “[…] BPF:” and coincide up to spacing in “[…] BPF:
Invalid name”. The coincidences seem to end here. Some of the remaining “[…]
BPF: …” lines are similar but, strictly speaking, different. Moreover, in
#1042237 these mesages have been read from the console, whereas in #1003965,
they have been taken from the kernel log. Further, in #1042237 no information
about any modules is printed, whereas in #1003965, a bunch of modules seems to
get not validated and not being able to load. Finally, #1042237 occured during
kernel upgrade only once (and has NOT re-occurred so far AFAIK during boot),
which might indicate a problem at kernel upgrades, whereas #1003965 occured
during boot.
Gratefully,
AlMa
