Bug#1004678: git-lfs: allow offline operation

2022-02-20 Thread Stephen Gelman
On Feb 20, 2022 at 3:29:31 AM, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > I will file an issue upstream. But I don't expect them to care, > because github (the company) probably views this issue as a feature, > not a bug. This issue ties people to a single central repository and > makes migration nearly

Bug#1004678: git-lfs: allow offline operation

2022-02-20 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
I will file an issue upstream. But I don't expect them to care, because github (the company) probably views this issue as a feature, not a bug. This issue ties people to a single central repository and makes migration nearly impossible, at least for non-wizards. Which is basically their business

Bug#1004678: git-lfs: allow offline operation

2022-02-19 Thread Stephen Gelman
Thanks for reporting this. I agree that it sounds useful, though it might be very challenging due to the decentralized nature of git-lfs. I’m happy to keep this bug open, but it seems better served for the upstream tracker at https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/issues. Stephen On Jan 31, 2022 at

Bug#1004678: git-lfs: allow offline operation

2022-01-31 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
Package: git-lfs Version: 3.0.2-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Barak A. Pearlmutter I have a repo whose only remote is on a gitlab instance. I'm using git-lfs to manage large binary files in this repo. The remote goes down. Now "git add foo.pdf / git commit", when *.pdf files are