On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 11:47:21PM +, James Addison wrote:
> Package: gcc-11
> Followup-For: Bug #1005863
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-rele...@lists.debian.org,
> debian-pol...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Bug #1005863 describes a gcc-11 behaviour that results
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 07:22, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 11:47:21PM +, James Addison wrote:
> > Would it be fair to raise the severity of this bug to a release-critical
> > level?
>
> No, it would be fair to remove Geode LX from the set of supported
> processors. Those
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 11:47:21PM +, James Addison wrote:
> Would it be fair to raise the severity of this bug to a release-critical
> level?
No, it would be fair to remove Geode LX from the set of supported
processors. Those are now over 15 years old.
Bastian
--
No one wants war.
Package: gcc-11
Followup-For: Bug #1005863
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-rele...@lists.debian.org,
debian-pol...@lists.debian.org
Hi folks,
Bug #1005863 describes a gcc-11 behaviour that results in software that exits
ungracefully on Geode LX i686 hardware. Despite
Package: gcc-11
Followup-For: Bug #1005863
X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi
> So my guess is that approximately 6-7% of i386 packages in bookworm _that
> contain binaries or shared libraries_ are susceptible to this bug.
...
> It's also a larger number of packages than we could expect
Package: gcc-11
Followup-For: Bug #1005863
X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi
Ok; I should have realised that scanning the entire contents of the i386
bookworm archive for particular opcodes across _all_ files on a single machine
seemed to complete surprisingly quickly..
Please find
Package: gcc-11
Followup-For: Bug #1005863
X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi
Control: affects -1 + sudo
> That's three potential positives; in total, the check ran on approximately
> thirty-two thousand (32340, to be more precise) packages.
My apologies: there was a bug in the script to
Package: gcc-11
Followup-For: Bug #1005863
X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi
Control: affects -1 - sudo net-tools
Control: affects -1 + libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-18
Control: affects -1 + gobjc++-12-x86-64-linux-gnu
Control: affects -1 + libfsapfs-dev
Dear Maintainer and Martin-Éric,
Using a
Package: gcc-11
Version: 11.2.0-16
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Via "Bug#1004894: sudo: [i386] invalid opcode", at the suggestion of the
maintainer, I'm opening this bug.
Since 1.9.9-1 'sudo' dumps core on a Geode LX host on i386. Attempts to build
from
9 matches
Mail list logo
