Am 17.08.23 um 14:25 schrieb Mark Brown:
Would it not be more sensible to just require that the format always be
specified?
The problem with that is that most of the implicitly 1.0 packages are essentially unmaintained.
Making them RC buggy intentionally by requiring an explicit format will
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 04:34:56PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Am 17.08.23 um 14:25 schrieb Mark Brown:
> > Would it not be more sensible to just require that the format always be
> > specified?
> The problem with that is that most of the implicitly 1.0 packages are
> essentially
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 04:51:44PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Am 16.08.23 um 16:40 schrieb Mark Brown:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 04:33:40PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> > > If you do not want to move to format 3.0, please at least specify 1.0
> > > format
> > > so that dpkg-source can
Am 16.08.23 um 16:40 schrieb Mark Brown:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 04:33:40PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
If you do not want to move to format 3.0, please at least specify 1.0 format
so that dpkg-source can move to default 3.0 format.
If you're forcing people to specify the format why does
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 04:33:40PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> If you do not want to move to format 3.0, please at least specify 1.0 format
> so that dpkg-source can move to default 3.0 format.
If you're forcing people to specify the format why does the default
matter?
signature.asc
If you do not want to move to format 3.0, please at least specify 1.0
format so that dpkg-source can move to default 3.0 format.
Source: tua
Version: 4.3-14
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv
Dear maintainer,
This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as
7 matches
Mail list logo
