Hello,
On Wed 11 May 2022 at 10:56AM +02, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I think that:
> [...]
> - git-using workflows are a best practice (based on their usage by the
> vast majority of packages)
>
> But I challenge that there is a consensus that git-first workflows are a
> best practice. I think tha
Hi,
On 10/05/22 at 16:57 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> 1.0-with-diff has advantages over 3.0 (quilt) particularly with git-based
> workflows, because in 3.0 (quilt) the diff is included inside the source
> tree
> The issue of preferred form for modification has been raised (source package
> in g
> "Matthew" == Matthew Vernon writes:
Matthew> Hi, I thought it might be useful to try and summarize where
Matthew> we are with this bug, which hasn't see much recent activity
Matthew> (not least as there's a TC meeting later...).
I read your summary and agree it is accurate. Th
Hi,
I thought it might be useful to try and summarize where we are with this
bug, which hasn't see much recent activity (not least as there's a TC
meeting later...).
* Questions asked of the TC
The Committee was invited to issue advice on a number of points:
I - continued use of 1.0 native
4 matches
Mail list logo
