Bug#1008700: Should geda-gaf be removed?

2022-05-05 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
severity 1008700 normal reassign 1008700 ftp.debian.org retitle 1008700 RM: geda-gaf -- RoM; Depends on Python 2, replacement exists thanks Reassigning for removal.

Bug#1008700: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#1008700: Should geda-gaf be removed?

2022-04-11 Thread Bdale Garbee
Moritz Mühlenhoff writes: > If lepton-eda is a sufficient drop-in replacement for existing geda-gaf > users, lepton could provide a geda-gaf transition package for the bookworm > release? I can file a bug against lepton-eda when geda-gaf has been > removed. Yes, we could certainly do that.

Bug#1008700: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#1008700: Should geda-gaf be removed?

2022-04-10 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Am Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 04:43:12PM -0600 schrieb Bdale Garbee: > Moritz Muehlenhoff writes: > > > Source: geda-gaf > > Version: 1:1.8.2-11 > > Severity: serious > > > > Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian: > > For the record, I've previously indicated that I consider

Bug#1008700: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#1008700: Should geda-gaf be removed?

2022-03-30 Thread Bdale Garbee
Moritz Muehlenhoff writes: > Source: geda-gaf > Version: 1:1.8.2-11 > Severity: serious > > Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian: For the record, I've previously indicated that I consider lepton-eda a complete replacement for geda-gaf in Debian. It was forked some years

Bug#1008700: Should geda-gaf be removed?

2022-03-30 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Source: geda-gaf Version: 1:1.8.2-11 Severity: serious Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian: - Still depends on Python 2 and thus removed from testing since 2019 - Also uses outdated Guile - Last upload in 2018 If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this