Hi,
On 2022-04-30 13:29, Neil Williams wrote:
>> Neil, is there a particular reason riscv64 support was disabled in
>> 2021.12+ds1-3?
> I didn't see it as particularly likely that any real-world usage of
> cctbx was manageable on any current RISCV64 hardware.
Thanks for explanation. I usually
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:18:35 +0300
Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2022-04-08 17:57, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > Building on riscv64 was silently disabled in 2021.12+ds1-3.
> > 2021.12+ds1-2 built successfully in the past [1], and 2021.12+ds1-4
> > continues to build in Ubuntu.
> >
> >
Hello,
On 2022-04-08 17:57, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Building on riscv64 was silently disabled in 2021.12+ds1-3.
> 2021.12+ds1-2 built successfully in the past [1], and 2021.12+ds1-4
> continues to build in Ubuntu.
>
> Please re-enable building on riscv64 as we would like to promote
> riscv64 to a
Source: cctbx
Version: 2021.12+ds1-3
Hi Maintainer
Building on riscv64 was silently disabled in 2021.12+ds1-3.
2021.12+ds1-2 built successfully in the past [1], and 2021.12+ds1-4
continues to build in Ubuntu.
Please re-enable building on riscv64 as we would like to promote
riscv64 to a release
4 matches
Mail list logo
