Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:28:04 +0800 "=?ISO-8859-1?B?ZnVtaWFtYQ==?="
wrote:
Thanks for your introduction. I have restored the Debian revision to -1 and
edited the changelog.
Then I sent an email and marked the ITP bug #1010055 as done. Now I would like
to remove
the
Control: reopen 1010055
Control: block 1010055 by -1
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:28:04 +0800 fumi...@foxmail.com wrote:
Dear Bastian,
Thanks for your introduction. I have restored the Debian revision to -1 and
edited the changelog.
Then I sent an email and marked the ITP bug #1010055 as done. Now
I have sought many articles about closing that ITP bug, but still not sure for
whether this reply will close #1010055 , please forgive me for this trying .
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:02:18 +0800 fumiama wrote:
Changes for the initial release:
base16384 (2.2.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Fix some issues in packaging. Closes: #1010055 (ITP).
Please always keep the -1 Debian revision until sour package is sponsored.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "base16384":
* Package name: base16384
Version : 2.2.0-3
Upstream Author : fumiama
* URL : https://github.com/fumiama/base16384
* License : GPL-3.0+
5 matches
Mail list logo