Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be

2022-05-17 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:28:04 +0800 "=?ISO-8859-1?B?ZnVtaWFtYQ==?=" wrote: Thanks for your introduction. I have restored the Debian revision to -1 and edited the changelog. Then I sent an email and marked the ITP bug #1010055 as done. Now I would like to remove the

Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be

2022-04-27 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: reopen 1010055 Control: block 1010055 by -1 On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:28:04 +0800 fumi...@foxmail.com wrote: Dear Bastian, Thanks for your introduction. I have restored the Debian revision to -1 and edited the changelog. Then I sent an email and marked the ITP bug #1010055 as done. Now

Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be

2022-04-27 Thread fumiama
I have sought many articles about closing that ITP bug, but still not sure for whether this reply will close #1010055 , please forgive me for this trying .

Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be

2022-04-27 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:02:18 +0800 fumiama wrote: Changes for the initial release: base16384 (2.2.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * Fix some issues in packaging. Closes: #1010055 (ITP). Please always keep the -1 Debian revision until sour package is sponsored.

Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be

2022-04-27 Thread fumiama
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "base16384": * Package name: base16384 Version : 2.2.0-3 Upstream Author : fumiama * URL : https://github.com/fumiama/base16384 * License : GPL-3.0+