Bug#1011549: openrocket needs newer jogl

2023-03-10 Thread tony mancill
Hello Pierre, On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:23:53PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote: > Hi tony, > > On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 10:15:35 -0800 tony mancill wrote: > > > > Okay, first the good news. There are upstream tags for 2.4.0. I have > > started working on adapting the sequence of debian/patches against th

Bug#1011549: openrocket needs newer jogl

2023-03-10 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi tony, On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 10:15:35 -0800 tony mancill wrote: > > Okay, first the good news. There are upstream tags for 2.4.0. I have > started working on adapting the sequence of debian/patches against the > new release. > > But in addition to not yet being done with that, it didn't seem pru

Bug#1011549: openrocket needs newer jogl

2023-02-12 Thread Bdale Garbee
tony mancill writes: > But in addition to not yet being done with that, it didn't seem prudent > to try to push this into bookwork at the last minute, and that wouldn't > have given the reverse dependencies any time to react anyway. So I am > going to work towards an upload to experimental soon,

Bug#1011549: openrocket needs newer jogl

2023-02-12 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 09:11:49AM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:30:43AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > Bdale Garbee writes: > > > > > I'll talk to openrocket upstream about it and see if I can't get some > > > clarification about what we actually need and a pointer to t

Bug#1011549: openrocket needs newer jogl

2023-02-05 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:30:43AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Bdale Garbee writes: > > > I'll talk to openrocket upstream about it and see if I can't get some > > clarification about what we actually need and a pointer to the relevant > > source code. > > I just got a pointer to > > https

Bug#1011549: openrocket needs newer jogl

2023-02-03 Thread Bdale Garbee
Bdale Garbee writes: > I'll talk to openrocket upstream about it and see if I can't get some > clarification about what we actually need and a pointer to the relevant > source code. I just got a pointer to https://github.com/openrocket/openrocket/pull/1958 This appears to document which fo

Bug#1011549: openrocket needs newer jogl

2022-05-25 Thread Bdale Garbee
tony mancill writes: > In other words, it seems to be non-free blobs all the way down. Sadly, I keep running into this in the Java world. > If the patched version of jogl is required for openrocket, we would need > someone to come up with some DFSG sources for the patches. I'll talk to openroc

Bug#1011549: openrocket needs newer jogl

2022-05-24 Thread tony mancill
Hi Bdale, On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 01:56:05PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Package: libjogl2-java > Version: 2.3.2+dfsg-9 > > I'm working on re-packaging openrocket so that it can go back into > Debian main. A big part of the work is eliding all the embedded class > library jar files and replacin

Bug#1011549: openrocket needs newer jogl

2022-05-24 Thread Bdale Garbee
Package: libjogl2-java Version: 2.3.2+dfsg-9 I'm working on re-packaging openrocket so that it can go back into Debian main. A big part of the work is eliding all the embedded class library jar files and replacing those with Debian library packages. One of the class libraries is jogl, for which