Hi,
Am 25.08.22 um 21:05 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
To clarify here, are you suggesting that we should skip this change for
buster?
Yes, given that we'd need a further update even more tiny and the next
release is the final one I don't think this warrants a full libreoffice
build.
Sorry for
Hi,
On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 23:05 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 26.07.22 um 19:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > actually this is quite a small update for a big package. Should we
> > really do it (and the default change)? Or should we assume people
> > don't
> > use LO from oldstable
Hi,
Am 26.07.22 um 19:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
actually this is quite a small update for a big package. Should we
really do it (and the default change)? Or should we assume people don't
use LO from oldstable anymore and either use bullseye or the bullseye
version backported to buster?
Filing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
actually this is quite a small update for a big package. Should we
really do it (and the default change)? Or should we assume people don't
use LO from oldstable anymore and
4 matches
Mail list logo
