Hello,
Can something still be done to let atop make to Debian Bookworm ?
Thanks.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 10:08:26PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 13-08-2022 21:34, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > running atop from unstable also hangs:
> > > root@elbrus:~# atop
> > > ^C
> >
> > on zelenka, running the atop binary just works fine. Installing atop
> > 2.7.1-2 in a DD chroot on zelenka
Hi,
On 13-08-2022 21:34, Marc Haber wrote:
running atop from unstable also hangs:
root@elbrus:~# atop
^C
on zelenka, running the atop binary just works fine. Installing atop
2.7.1-2 in a DD chroot on zelenka also works fine, and the binary is ok
as well. However, the chroots dont start the
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 03:02:36PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 12-08-2022 12:23, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:51:32PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > On 10-08-2022 12:03, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > > I tried the (dead simple)d autopkgtest on the s390s and arm64
> > > >
Hi,
[tl;dr: atop seems to hang on s390x]
On 12-08-2022 12:23, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:51:32PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 10-08-2022 12:03, Marc Haber wrote:
Unfortunately, this bug report suffers from multiple cut or
template error. The ci link points to the mercurial
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:51:32PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 10-08-2022 12:03, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Unfortunately, this bug report suffers from multiple cut or
> > template error. The ci link points to the mercurial page for amd64, the
> > text alternates between s390s, armhf, arm64 and
Hi Marc,
On 10-08-2022 12:03, Marc Haber wrote:
Unfortunately, this bug report suffers from multiple cut or
template error. The ci link points to the mercurial page for amd64, the
text alternates between s390s, armhf, arm64 and amd64.
There was only one that I'm aware of, the link to
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 08:06:29AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package because it was
> showing up on our page for long running tests on s390x. I noticed that the
> test always fails on s390x with an autopkgtest timeout. Your package
> regressed on
Source: atop
Version: 2.7.1-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: timeout regression
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package because it was
showing up on our page for long running tests on
9 matches
Mail list logo
