Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-16 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 12:14:05PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote: > BTW If someone can give me a hint where in the code one would define > such a variation I'll cheerfully give it a go myself, but sadly it seems > that my python is too weak to find the right spot for myself. The variations are

Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-15 Thread Philip Hands
Vagrant Cascadian writes: > On 2022-09-14, Philip Hands wrote: >> Vagrant Cascadian writes: >> but also (given that the tests will have passed during the normal build) the tests failing during the varied build seems unlikely to be identifying faults that are worth

Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-14 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-09-14, Philip Hands wrote: > Vagrant Cascadian writes: > >>> but also >>> (given that the tests will have passed during the normal build) the tests >>> failing during the varied build seems unlikely to be identifying faults >>> that are >>> worth fixing, and so is just a waste of cycles.

Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-14 Thread Philip Hands
Vagrant Cascadian writes: >> but also >> (given that the tests will have passed during the normal build) the tests >> failing during the varied build seems unlikely to be identifying faults that >> are >> worth fixing, and so is just a waste of cycles. > > How do you know weather the bugs it is

Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-14 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-09-14, Philip Hands wrote: > I suggest adding a 'nocheck' variation, that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck > during the build, Sounds reasonable! > and enabling it by default. Less sure... > The reason for doing so is that one could imagine that a package produces > differing results

Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-14 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Phil, On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 04:00:04PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote: > I suggest adding a 'nocheck' variation, that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck > during the build, and enabling it by default. [...] > Option 2) is what I'm suggesting making into a default variation. [...] > If nothing else it

Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-14 Thread Philip Hands
Package: reprotest Version: 0.7.22 Severity: wishlist I suggest adding a 'nocheck' variation, that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck during the build, and enabling it by default. The reason for doing so is that one could imagine that a package produces differing results depending upon whether the