Bug#1020246: Not an active maintainer, but

2023-06-24 Thread Iustin Pop
On 2023-06-24 16:58:15, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ndmitchell/hoogle/issues/359 > > Hi Iustin, > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 11:25PM, Iustin Pop wrote: > > AFAIK, both armel and armfh are low-powered/"slow" arches, but i386 is > > surprising. Maybe due to

Bug#1020246: Not an active maintainer, but

2023-06-24 Thread Ilias Tsitsimpis
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ndmitchell/hoogle/issues/359 Hi Iustin, On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 11:25PM, Iustin Pop wrote: > AFAIK, both armel and armfh are low-powered/"slow" arches, but i386 is > surprising. Maybe due to memory limits? > > I wonder if tests shouldn't simply be

Bug#1020246: Not an active maintainer, but

2023-04-23 Thread Iustin Pop
AFAIK, both armel and armfh are low-powered/"slow" arches, but i386 is surprising. Maybe due to memory limits? I wonder if tests shouldn't simply be restricted to amd64, arm64, ppc64el and s390x? This should give it enough of architecture heterogeneity to catch any problems that simply do not