Aurelien Jarno writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-09-26 09:45, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> And post removing /usr/lib version of libc it seems to work fine and no
>> crash is happening.
>>
>> └─(09:44:30 on master)──> expr
>>
Hi,
On 2022-09-26 09:45, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> And post removing /usr/lib version of libc it seems to work fine and no
> crash is happening.
>
> └─(09:44:30 on master)──> expr
>
Vasudev Kamath writes:
> Post installation of usrmerge this output is changed
>
> └─(09:37:07 on master)──> ls -ld /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
>
> 1 ↵ ──(Mon,Sep26)─┘
> -rwxr-xr-x 1
Vasudev Kamath writes:
>
> └─(09:09:40 on master)──> ls -ld /lib
>
> ──(Mon,Sep26)─┘
> drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 4096 Sep 23 14:37 /lib
>
>
> I have looked at the coredump you sent me:
>
> $ eu-unstrip -n --core
> core.expr.1000.d5ff83e0fd69439497afd17511de3417.85280.166392358300
> 0x5604c0781000+0x1e000
> b919757cbc30fbb64b14498222499d972fd80acd@0x5604c0781368 . - /usr/bin/expr
> 0x7fbfabc0+0x201000
>
control: notfound -1 glibc/2.34-8
control: found -1 glibc/2.35-1
Hello Vasudev,
On 2022-09-24 21:18, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>
> > Hello Vasudev,
> > ok, reverting back would explain reportbug using version 2.34-8.
> >
> > But was this core taken at a time where all libc packages
> > should have
> Hello Vasudev,
> ok, reverting back would explain reportbug using version 2.34-8.
>
> But was this core taken at a time where all libc packages
> should have been at 2.35-1 ?
> Then I don't understand that "Module" line,
> which shows the build-id from 2.34-8.
Ah sorry I did coredumpctl
Am 24.09.22 um 04:24 schrieb Vasudev Kamath:
Hi Aurelien,
Old libc is because I reverted it as some scripts I use and autoconf as well
were breaking.
I assume I have mentioned in report that a downgrade solved crash. If I missed
sorry about that.
Sorry for top posting as I’m replying from
Hi Aurelien,
Old libc is because I reverted it as some scripts I use and autoconf as well
were breaking.
I assume I have mentioned in report that a downgrade solved crash. If I missed
sorry about that.
Sorry for top posting as I’m replying from my pho e
Sent from my iPhone
> On
Hi,
On 2022-09-23 21:28, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 14:45:07 +0530 Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.34-8
>
> > I upgraded libc6 to latest released 2.35-1
>
> > Module ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 with build-id
> >
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 14:45:07 +0530 Vasudev Kamath wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.34-8
I upgraded libc6 to latest released 2.35-1
Module ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 with build-id
a03c3b14d371da908a3f22007b3f0c73d1f9f634
Module libc.so.6 with build-id
Package: libc6
Version: 2.34-8
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I upgraded libc6 to latest released 2.35-1
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
12 matches
Mail list logo
