Bug#1020654: C.UTF-8: surprising differences in character classes

2022-09-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi Aurelien, >Starting with glibc 2.35, we do not patch the glibc to add C.UTF-8 >support, instead we use the upstream code which comes with the following >NEWS entry [1]: […] Thanks for the extra info. >> They are as mandated by POSIX for the C locale. I believe I said >> in my original 2013 pr

Bug#1020654: C.UTF-8: surprising differences in character classes

2022-09-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, On 2022-09-24 23:16, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Package: locales > Version: 2.35-1 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de > > While adjusting my localedata patch script to the latest glibc uploads > I discovered a surprising difference in some categories — for example: Starting with

Bug#1020654: C.UTF-8: surprising differences in character classes

2022-09-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: locales Version: 2.35-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de While adjusting my localedata patch script to the latest glibc uploads I discovered a surprising difference in some categories — for example: (sid-amd64)tglase@tglase:~ $ LC_ALL=C ./tstspc U+0009 U+000A U+000B U+000C U