Bug#1021810: Should firefox-esr be dropped on 32bit architectures in bookworm?

2022-11-08 Thread karogyoker999
Actually, firefox-esr doesn't even work on real x86_32 CPUs (except Pentium 4) since years. It requires SSE2 without the sse2-support package, so basically it is committing a baseline violation on i386. Currently, due to some random GCC behavior, it doesn't crash instantly when I try to open any

Bug#1021810: Should firefox-esr be dropped on 32bit architectures in bookworm?

2022-10-29 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Adrian, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:25:34AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > P.S.: Due to making this bug report "release critical", automatic > > updates on stable with apt-listbugs stopped applying firefox-esr > > security updates. Otherwise I wouldn't have noticed it. :-P

Bug#1021810: Should firefox-esr be dropped on 32bit architectures in bookworm?

2022-10-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:25:34AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: >... > P.S.: Due to making this bug report "release critical", automatic > updates on stable with apt-listbugs stopped applying firefox-esr > security updates. Otherwise I wouldn't have noticed it. :-P The bug is tagged "bookworm,

Bug#1021810: Should firefox-esr be dropped on 32bit architectures in bookworm?

2022-10-20 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I don't see why we should preemptively remove firefox from architectures for > a build issue that may or may not happen 3 years from now. If it happens and > we can't fix/workaround it, then we can discontinue FF security updates > there. But until then, I

Bug#1021810: Should firefox-esr be dropped on 32bit architectures in bookworm?

2022-10-18 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/10/2022 08:27, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: firefox-esr Version: 102.3.0esr-1 Severity: serious Tags: bookworm sid X-Debbugs-Cc: Carsten Schoenert , debian-rele...@lists.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org [ various potentially interested parties are Cc'ed ]

Bug#1021810: Should firefox-esr be dropped on 32bit architectures in bookworm?

2022-10-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022, at 8:27 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: firefox-esr > Version: 102.3.0esr-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: bookworm sid > X-Debbugs-Cc: Carsten Schoenert , > debian-rele...@lists.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org, > debian-...@lists.debian.org > > [ various potentially

Bug#1021810: Should firefox-esr be dropped on 32bit architectures in bookworm?

2022-10-15 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 09:27:33AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: firefox-esr > Version: 102.3.0esr-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: bookworm sid > X-Debbugs-Cc: Carsten Schoenert , > debian-rele...@lists.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org, > debian-...@lists.debian.org > > [ various

Bug#1021810: Should firefox-esr be dropped on 32bit architectures in bookworm?

2022-10-15 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 09:27:33AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: firefox-esr > Version: 102.3.0esr-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: bookworm sid > X-Debbugs-Cc: Carsten Schoenert , > debian-rele...@lists.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org, > debian-...@lists.debian.org > > [ various

Bug#1021810: Should firefox-esr be dropped on 32bit architectures in bookworm?

2022-10-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: firefox-esr Version: 102.3.0esr-1 Severity: serious Tags: bookworm sid X-Debbugs-Cc: Carsten Schoenert , debian-rele...@lists.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org [ various potentially interested parties are Cc'ed ] 4 GB address space for one process is an