Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug

2022-10-29 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Sat, 2022-10-29 at 09:23 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > No unfortunately we cannot do that. The reason is similar to what > lead > to > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/248736d493fcfd0e05cd23f97befe40f5c125c71 > or caused bugs like #916927. Forgive me my ignorance,

Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug

2022-10-29 Thread Vincent Bernat
On 2022-10-29 09:23, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: So question is,.. would it make sense to request that linux-image-amd64 depends on the signed | unsigned version? No unfortunately we cannot do that. The reason is similar to what lead to

Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug

2022-10-29 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Christoph, On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 12:36:01AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Hey Salvatore. > > On Fri, 2022-10-28 at 06:49 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > I did decide to still do so, so we can have the CVE fix migrate > > finally to testing (which took some time as well

Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug

2022-10-28 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hey Salvatore. On Fri, 2022-10-28 at 06:49 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > I did decide to still do so, so we can have the CVE fix migrate > finally to testing (which took some time as well given there was the > perl transition ongoing). Fine for me... I think it would be nice if there was

Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug

2022-10-27 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: severity -1 serious Hi Christoph, Thanks for the quick feedback! On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 09:10:53PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Am 27. Oktober 2022 20:56:49 MESZ schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso > : > >According to your references there is the workaround of mounting with >

Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug

2022-10-27 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Am 27. Oktober 2022 20:56:49 MESZ schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso : >According to your references there is the workaround of mounting with >clear_cache,space_cache=v2 and convert the filesystem. > >What would one prevent doing so? v2 space cache is still rather new and had only recently some

Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug

2022-10-27 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: severity -1 important Hi, On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 10:23:35PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Source: linux > Version: 5.19.6-1 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > > Hi. > > 6.0.3 introduced a commit that causes (permanent) CPU soft lockups > for

Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug

2022-10-26 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Control: retitle -1 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug in 6.0.3, affecting space cache v1 filesystems Control: notfound -1 5.19.6-1 Control: found -1 6.0.3-1 No idea why reportbug picked 5.19.6, which I have not even installed anymore... o.O

Bug#1022848: linux: 6.0.5 fixes critical btrfs bug

2022-10-26 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Source: linux Version: 5.19.6-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Hi. 6.0.3 introduced a commit that causes (permanent) CPU soft lockups for some people with btrfs filesystems, effectively breaking the system, e.g. when booting. See e.g.