Bug#1022964: libselinux FTCBFS: python and ruby extensions

2023-03-24 Thread James Addison
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 at 13:50, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > Thank you very much for your review and the attention to detail. I > concur with your observation and have updated the patch accordingly. > This part slipped my testing, because I never tried the clean target and > most cross builds never

Bug#1022964: libselinux FTCBFS: python and ruby extensions

2023-03-24 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi James, On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:09:32AM +, James Addison wrote: > Could you check whether the patch is missing a 'call ruby_env' line in the > debian/rules 'override_dh_auto_clean' target? Thank you very much for your review and the attention to detail. I concur with your observation

Bug#1022964: libselinux FTCBFS: python and ruby extensions

2023-03-24 Thread James Addison
Source: libselinux Followup-For: Bug #1022964 X-Debbugs-Cc: hel...@subdivi.de Hi Helmut, Could you check whether the patch is missing a 'call ruby_env' line in the debian/rules 'override_dh_auto_clean' target? (it looks like it could be, but I may be mistaken) Thanks, James

Bug#1022964: libselinux FTCBFS: python and ruby extensions

2022-10-28 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: libselinux Version: 3.4-1 Tags: patch User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Usertags: cross-satisfiability ftcbfs libselinux is long part of architecture cross bootstrap, but a full cross build of libselinux without build profiles still doesn't work yet. Given the recent work on ruby by