>I know nothing about the technical details here, but it seems quite
>unlikely to me that anything external would ever depend on libzia, so
>shipping both in one package would make sense.
I second that. libzia is only used by tucnak. So making it one package would be
absolutely fine.
73s F
Re: tony mancill
> Is there a reason why libzia shouldn't install a libzia.so or
> libzia.0.so symlink to the currently installed version of the library so
> we can potentially upgrade the library without necessarily breaking
> tucnak installs (and vice-versa)? Or if there is a good reason why thi
Source: libzia
Version: 4.36-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
I am working to update tucnak and libzia to 4.37 and am finally fully
grokking something Christoph mentioned a while back about the tight
coupling between these packages.
The libzia-4.37 package is ready to upload. However, doing so will
im
3 matches
Mail list logo
