Bug#1025234: prometheus: flaky autopkgtest (on 32 bit archs?)

2023-01-06 Thread Daniel Swarbrick
On 07.01.23 12:40, Adrian Bunk wrote: Does running the autopkgtests on 32-bit bring more benefits than hassle, or should they be run only on 64-bit architectures? As troublesome as the tests are on 32-bit, and as much as it would probably be simpler to just blanket disable them in d/rules, I

Bug#1025234: prometheus: flaky autopkgtest (on 32 bit archs?)

2023-01-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 05:51:20PM +1300, Daniel Swarbrick wrote: > Hi Paul, > > I have also noticed the fairly frequent failures of the memory-intensive > tests on 32-bit, and I am doing my best to keep on top of them with t.Skip() > patches where appropriate. Several of the tests result in the

Bug#1025234: prometheus: flaky autopkgtest (on 32 bit archs?)

2022-12-01 Thread Daniel Swarbrick
Hi Paul, I have also noticed the fairly frequent failures of the memory-intensive tests on 32-bit, and I am doing my best to keep on top of them with t.Skip() patches where appropriate. Several of the tests result in the 4 GiB memory footprint threshold being exceeded. Prometheus itself is

Bug#1025234: prometheus: flaky autopkgtest (on 32 bit archs?)

2022-12-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: prometheus Version: 2.33.5+ds1-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: flaky Dear maintainer(s), I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package (because it blocked glibc). I noticed that it regularly fails. At least on 32 bits architectures, I think