Hi Paul,
On Mon, 2023-01-02 at 07:29 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> After this discussion (thanks for having it), I think it's best to
> reopen bug 967348, have fp-units-gtk2-x.y.z depend on libgtk2.0-dev
> again and *stop shipping* fp-units-gtk2-x.y.z once libgtk2.0-dev needs
> to be removed.
I
Abou Al Montacir, le dim. 01 janv. 2023 23:51:45 +0100, a ecrit:
> > Things were just working perfectly previously. Why breaking the build
> > of packages using fp-units-gtk2-3.2.0 by dropping the pull? Is there an
> > *actual* reason for not making fp-units-gtk2-3.2.0 pull it,
>
> Yes, the
On Sun, 2023-01-01 at 21:45 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > • Technically, Lazarus doe snot need libgtk2.0-dev for running, and thus
> > should not pull it.
>
> Lazarus itself, no indeed. But the fp-units-gtk2-3.2.0 package does not
> make any sense without libgtk2.0-dev, since there is
3 matches
Mail list logo