On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, Mark Hindley wrote:
>Yes, That is the debootstrap one. However on a new installation, partconf then
>fills in the entries for the newly partitioned system[1]
Then you’ve identified which tool is responsible for ensuring that
either the respective fsck is installed or the passn
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 05:44:44PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> >Yes, although I think the default fstab has pass=1 for root.
>
> Nope. The default fstab is precisely this:
>
> >> # UNCONFIGURED FSTAB FOR BASE SYSTEM
Yes, That is the debootstrap on
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, Mark Hindley wrote:
>Yes, although I think the default fstab has pass=1 for root.
Nope. The default fstab is precisely this:
>> # UNCONFIGURED FSTAB FOR BASE SYSTEM
The person-or-thing which enters a line with pass ≠ 0 is
responsible for ensuring (first!) that the fsck utili
Thorsten,
Thanks for this.
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:55:59PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> >> fsck is util-linux, not e2fsprogs.
> >
> >Yes, but fsck.ext4 is e2fsprogs and that is what is missing in #1028181.
>
> But that’s ⓐ the user’s problem and
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, Mark Hindley wrote:
>> fsck is util-linux, not e2fsprogs.
>
>Yes, but fsck.ext4 is e2fsprogs and that is what is missing in #1028181.
But that’s ⓐ the user’s problem and ⓑ not necessarily an error
as there exist filesystems for which no fsck binary exists.
(If the user has se
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 12:57:53AM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, Lorenzo Puliti wrote:
>
> >This package "only" recommands e2fsprogs, so I think it should just
>
> fsck is util-linux, not e2fsprogs.
Yes, but fsck.ext4 is e2fsprogs and that is what is missing in #1028181.
A
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, Lorenzo Puliti wrote:
>This package "only" recommands e2fsprogs, so I think it should just
fsck is util-linux, not e2fsprogs.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH
Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
Telephon +49 228 54881-393
Package: initscripts
Version: 3.06-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: plore...@disroot.org
Hi all,
there are 2 scripts that run fsck without testing if the command
is available in the system: checkroot.sh and checkfs.sh
This package "only" recommands e2fsprogs, so I think it should just
print a war
8 matches
Mail list logo
