I think this change:
https://salsa.debian.org/freedesktop-team/fontconfig/-/commit/6fae069d
is relevant to this discussion.
--
Cheers,
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
As I kind of rushed the fix for this here is what I am sure should be
the most correct way to fix this issue. If you want to change the
fonts system wide create /etc/fonts/local.conf for your user only
~/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf and put the following in the file:
serif
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 13:03:00 - t...@envs.net wrote:
> i can't downgrade - this is the only version available
>
> this fixed the color artifacts for me:
>
> remove /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-sub-pixel-rgb.conf
This sounds like a different issue as far as I know the font change
shouldn't affect
i can't downgrade - this is the only version available
this fixed the color artifacts for me:
remove /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-sub-pixel-rgb.conf
Yesterday I noticed a substantial change in the interface fonts for my
whole system, I'm running Testing. They appear somewhat clearer, but
don't align properly like the old fonts. I'm using MATE, and it caused
things like titlebars to increase in size. I had noticed rendering
changes with
This is the upstream change in fontconfig that led to this bug report
[1]. I can't find any reason why Noto is now preferred over DejaVu in
the change or issues.
[1]
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/fontconfig/-/commit/ad70d785974992c569b30108923875e5b5e9dc5e
Just to add as an XFCE user this change greatly impacted the look of
my desktop. So while this may be fine for GNOME users, people with
other DEs could be affected by the change.
I also didn't quite get the file correct to revert the change in my
previous email so here's the updated version, as
For anyone who is not super happy with this change from DejaVu to Noto
I just did this to revert it:
1. Create a file called /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-prefer-dejavu.conf
2. Add the following:
monospace
DejaVu Sans Mono
sans
DejaVu Sans Book
serif
Control: severity -1 normal
Hey Sébastien.
On Sat, 2023-01-14 at 15:19 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> As far as I can tell, it’s not that the font rendering has changed,
> but
> that the default monospace font has changed (it was previously DejaVu
> Mono Book on my system, now it’s Noto Sans
On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 06:56:53 +0100 Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> Package: fontconfig
> Version: 2.14.1-3
> Severity: important
> After upgrading from 2.13.1-4.5 to 2.14.1-3 the font rendering looks
> noticebly different (and IMO worse).
>
> Attached are some example images (before/after).
10 matches
Mail list logo
