Bug#1028722: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1028722: prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 3205 != 3211 : selection 'abs(x) == sqrt(sq(x))' for Selection 'all' failed, expected 3211, selected 3205

2023-11-06 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi, On 2023-11-06 14:17, Santiago Vila wrote: Note: I'd like to see this fixed in stable, but RMs require (rightly so) that this is fixed in unstable first. Thanks. You may look into disabling prody's part which uses biopython, maybe this will make it easier to fix the comparison issue in

Bug#1028722: prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 3205 != 3211 : selection 'abs(x) == sqrt(sq(x))' for Selection 'all' failed, expected 3211, selected 3205

2023-11-06 Thread Santiago Vila
Note: I'd like to see this fixed in stable, but RMs require (rightly so) that this is fixed in unstable first. Thanks. You may look into disabling prody's part which uses biopython, maybe this will make it easier to fix the comparison issue in unstable. I don't know whether this is possible,

Bug#1028722: prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 3205 != 3211 : selection 'abs(x) == sqrt(sq(x))' for Selection 'all' failed, expected 3211, selected 3205

2023-11-06 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Santiago, On 2023-11-02 01:14, Santiago Vila wrote: El 13/10/23 a las 8:04, Andrius Merkys escribió: To summarize: The failing test is buggy because when it fails it does not necessarily mean that the package was misbuilt, and in my opinion the best thing to do would be to disable it, both

Bug#1028722: prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 3205 != 3211 : selection 'abs(x) == sqrt(sq(x))' for Selection 'all' failed, expected 3211, selected 3205

2023-11-01 Thread Santiago Vila
El 13/10/23 a las 8:04, Andrius Merkys escribió: To summarize: The failing test is buggy because when it fails it does not necessarily mean that the package was misbuilt, and in my opinion the best thing to do would be to disable it, both in stable and unstable. Trivial patch in the second

Bug#1028722: prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 3205 != 3211 : selection 'abs(x) == sqrt(sq(x))' for Selection 'all' failed, expected 3211, selected 3205

2023-10-13 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hello, On 2023-10-12 21:22, Santiago Vila wrote: To summarize: The failing test is buggy because when it fails it does not necessarily mean that the package was misbuilt, and in my opinion the best thing to do would be to disable it, both in stable and unstable. Trivial patch in the second

Bug#1028722: prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 3205 != 3211 : selection 'abs(x) == sqrt(sq(x))' for Selection 'all' failed, expected 3211, selected 3205

2023-10-12 Thread Santiago Vila
tags 1028722 + patch thanks Hello. I asked Drew Parsons to look at this bug because he reported a similar bug with severity:serious here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053265 In both cases the failure happens while comparing floating point numbers using the equality

Bug#1028722: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1028722: prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 3205 != 3211 : selection 'abs(x) == sqrt(sq(x))' for Selection 'all' failed, expected 3211, selected 3205

2023-10-02 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hello, On 2023-09-30 15:11, Drew Parsons wrote: There seems to be ambiguity about the reproducibility of this bug. That's possibly consistent with problems with rounding, though the bug here seems to be more than an issue with floating point precision. Upstream has made a new release. I

Bug#1028722: prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 3205 != 3211 : selection 'abs(x) == sqrt(sq(x))' for Selection 'all' failed, expected 3211, selected 3205

2023-09-30 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: prody Followup-For: Bug #1028722 There seems to be ambiguity about the reproducibility of this bug. That's possibly consistent with problems with rounding, though the bug here seems to be more than an issue with floating point precision. Upstream has made a new release. I suggest

Bug#1028722: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1028722: prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 3205 != 3211 : selection 'abs(x) == sqrt(sq(x))' for Selection 'all' failed, expected 3211, selected 3205

2023-02-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 27/01/23 at 14:31 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible > > Hello, > > On 2023-01-27 13:40, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 01:42:10PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Source: prody > > > Version:

Bug#1028722: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1028722: prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 3205 != 3211 : selection 'abs(x) == sqrt(sq(x))' for Selection 'all' failed, expected 3211, selected 3205

2023-01-27 Thread Andrius Merkys
Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible Hello, On 2023-01-27 13:40, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 01:42:10PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: prody Version: 2.3.1+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User:

Bug#1028722: prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 3205 != 3211 : selection 'abs(x) == sqrt(sq(x))' for Selection 'all' failed, expected 3211, selected 3205

2023-01-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 01:42:10PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: prody > Version: 2.3.1+dfsg-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid,