True.
I'm not a C programmer, so I may be unduly concerned about the maintenance
load. I'll defer to your judgement.
I do wonder if we should make a stab at switching the rust bits to using Debian
packages instead of the embedded copies. If we could manage it, then any
security issues in
On 25 February 2023 14:57:28 UTC, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>Generally favorably, but I'd rather wait for upstream to agree on it,
>otherwise it may be a patch we have to maintain forever.
Now we maintain the tfm bits.
>What's their reaction to the change?
No reply so far. The first few patches
Generally favorably, but I'd rather wait for upstream to agree on it, otherwise
it may be a patch we have to maintain forever. What's their reaction to the
change?
It's also late in the release cycle to do it (not definitely a problem, but
calls for caution).
Scott K
On February 25, 2023
On 2023-02-24 21:00:43 [+], Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I don't know of anything. I'd go ahead and upload the fix.
how do you feel about replacing libtfm with openssl?
> Scott K
Sebastian
4 matches
Mail list logo
