Bug#1035802: RM: repsnapper -- RoQA; gtkglextmm dependency

2023-09-26 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Please remove repsnapper. The maintainer agreed. It is the last reverse dependency of gtkglextmm. The last upstream release was in 2017 and the package has a low popcon.

Bug#1035802: RM: repsnapper -- RoQA; gtkglextmm dependency

2023-09-25 Thread Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
Hi Bastian, Yes. You can do it. Otherwise I'll do it later. We don't need this package anymore in next release. Yours, Paul On 2023/9/24 01:03, Bastian Germann wrote: Hi Paul, On #1042739 you mentioned that repsnapper can be removed. Would it be okay to file a RM bug? Thanks, Bastian Ope

Bug#1035802: RM: repsnapper -- RoQA; gtkglextmm dependency

2023-09-23 Thread Bastian Germann
Hi Paul, On #1042739 you mentioned that repsnapper can be removed. Would it be okay to file a RM bug? Thanks, Bastian

Bug#1035802: RM: repsnapper -- RoQA; gtkglextmm dependency

2023-05-20 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 11.05.23 um 08:10 schrieb PaulLiu: Why should this package be removed? Any replacement for using GL with GTK by a C++ wrapper or C++-style? The same reason as your #967724: GTK 2 should be removed in the long run. You have to start somewhere and leaf packages of language bindings for gtk2 a

Bug#1035802: RM: repsnapper -- RoQA; gtkglextmm dependency

2023-05-10 Thread PaulLiu
Hi Bastian, I tried to build this package without gtkglextmm but it failed. Looking into the code, it really uses gtkglextmm. For example, it uses Gtk::GL and Gdk::GL. Why should this package be removed? Any replacement for using GL with GTK by a C++ wrapper or C++-style? I know I might rewrite a

Bug#1035802: RM: repsnapper -- RoQA; gtkglextmm dependency

2023-05-09 Thread Bastian Germann
Source: repsnapper Control: block 967492 by -1 Please consider filing a remove bug for repsnapper. It is one of the two last dependencies of gtkglextmm, which should be removed. Maybe you can even build without it.