On 31 July 2023 at 23:13, Adrian Bunk wrote:
| On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 04:37:22PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
| > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 03:30:18PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > >
| > > On 13 June 2023 at 13:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
| > > | Control: reassign -1 r-cran-rstan r-cran-bh
| >
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 04:37:22PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 03:30:18PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >
> > On 13 June 2023 at 13:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > | Control: reassign -1 r-cran-rstan r-cran-bh
> > | Control: found -1 r-cran-rstan/2.21.8-1
> > |
> > |
Am Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 05:26:15AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> However pruning this off 32-bit archsn would also mean
> removing a huge chunk of other R packages which transitively depend on rstan.
> As far as I checked, not all of them are intensive to run, and it is
> likely useful for people
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 05:17:38AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > Stan is for power users on performant
> > machines and these MCMC runs take a loong time.
Oh, and I forgot to address this. You are right ofcourse, and probably
not a lot of people would be interested in running rstan on 32-bit
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 03:45:28PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> But nobody suggested to turn 32bit builds for R off so it was not a question
> that needed adressing. Or did I miss something here?
Maybe my wording was a little confusing. I meant to keep the support for
rstan by applying the
Nilesh,
But nobody suggested to turn 32bit builds for R off so it was not a question
that needed adressing. Or did I miss something here?
We do have _a_ package failing. My first suggestion always is to talk to
upstream (and I did so on June 13 in my first post on this bug report). Has
Hi Nilesh,
Am Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:06:02PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> 1. rstan has got a lot of reverse-build-deps and reverse-deps
> and those reversd-deps have further more of them. rstan is kind of an
> important package in that sense, and dropping 32-bit arch for this would
> mean
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 01:56:16PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> If someone thinks we should keep 32bit support and apply the patch
> suggested to r-base (which Dirk seems to be willing to) please speak
> up soonish (in the next two weeks).
I think we should keep 32-bit. Some reasons I can think
Hi Adrian and Dirk,
thanks a lot to Adrian for taking the time to dig into R source code for
a fix.
Am Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:04:02PM -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> | > Not sure that it is fair to point at BH / Boost though. Anyway.
> | >
> | > CRAN no longer checks / compiles 32 bit so
On 19 June 2023 at 16:37, Adrian Bunk wrote:
| On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 03:30:18PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 13 June 2023 at 13:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
| > | Control: reassign -1 r-cran-rstan r-cran-bh
| > | Control: found -1 r-cran-rstan/2.21.8-1
| > |
| > | Unfortunately,
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 03:30:18PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 13 June 2023 at 13:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | Control: reassign -1 r-cran-rstan r-cran-bh
> | Control: found -1 r-cran-rstan/2.21.8-1
> |
> | Unfortunately, at least in Ubuntu it appears the r-cran-rstan build still
> |
Am Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 03:30:18PM -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> On 13 June 2023 at 13:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | Unfortunately, at least in Ubuntu it appears the r-cran-rstan build still
> | exhausts the 32-bit memory space even with boost 1.81.
> |
> |
On 13 June 2023 at 13:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
| Control: reassign -1 r-cran-rstan r-cran-bh
| Control: found -1 r-cran-rstan/2.21.8-1
|
| Unfortunately, at least in Ubuntu it appears the r-cran-rstan build still
| exhausts the 32-bit memory space even with boost 1.81.
|
|
Control: reassign -1 r-cran-rstan r-cran-bh
Control: found -1 r-cran-rstan/2.21.8-1
Unfortunately, at least in Ubuntu it appears the r-cran-rstan build still
exhausts the 32-bit memory space even with boost 1.81.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r-cran-rstan/2.21.8-1/+build/26010118
It
On 12 June 2023 at 16:08, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:22:39PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > edd@rob:~$ cat deb/bh/debian/control
| > Source: r-cran-bh
| > Section: gnu-r
| > Priority: optional
| > Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel
| > Build-Depends:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:22:39PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> edd@rob:~$ cat deb/bh/debian/control
> Source: r-cran-bh
> Section: gnu-r
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel
> Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 11), r-base-dev (>= 4.1.1), dh-r
>
Hi Steve,
On 12 June 2023 at 14:41, Steve Langasek wrote:
| Package: r-cran-bh
| Version: 1.74.0-2
| User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
| Usertags: origin-ubuntu mantic
| Affects: r-cran-rstan/2.21.8-1
|
| Hi Dirk,
|
| r-cran-rstan 2.21.8-1 is failing to build from source in Debian and
Package: r-cran-bh
Version: 1.74.0-2
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu mantic
Affects: r-cran-rstan/2.21.8-1
Hi Dirk,
r-cran-rstan 2.21.8-1 is failing to build from source in Debian and Ubuntu
on 32-bit architectures because it exhausts the 32-bit virtual memory space.
18 matches
Mail list logo
