"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> Assuming that all of the changes are in unstable (or not required
> there), please go ahead.
Hi Adam,
All three patches are cherry-picks (although one required manual
backporting) from 2.1.6, which is already in testing.
Source-only upload done, hope it's all right.
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2023-07-09 at 23:37 +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - confirmed
>
> Jonathan Wiltshire writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 07:14:09PM +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> >
> > > Shortly after the release of bookworm we got a report that
> > >
Control: tag -1 - confirmed
Jonathan Wiltshire writes:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 07:14:09PM +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
>
>> Shortly after the release of bookworm we got a report that Pacemaker
>> regressed in certain migration scenarios when compared to the bullseye
>> version. Upstream
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 07:14:09PM +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> Shortly after the release of bookworm we got a report that Pacemaker
> regressed in certain migration scenarios when compared to the bullseye
> version. Upstream identified the cause (a bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear Stable Release Team,
[ Reason ]
Shortly after the release of bookworm we got a report that Pacemaker
regressed in certain migration scenarios when compared to the bullseye
5 matches
Mail list logo
