> "Steve" == Steve Langasek writes:
Steve> I've therefore prepared and uploaded the attached patch to
Steve> mantic, which implements your option 1. I note you only
Steve> mentioned adding Breaks: against older libk5crypto3; a scan
Steve> of the binary packages showed many
Package: krb5
Version: 1.20.1-3
Followup-For: Bug #1043184
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu mantic ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi Sam,
Since Ubuntu currently has glibc 2.38 (whereas Debian only has it in
experimental), this is a release-critical bug for us and
Sam Hartman, le lun. 14 août 2023 13:15:49 -0600, a ecrit:
> That's problematic, because there is not a strict version dependency
> between libk5crypto3 and libkrb5support0.
Ah, I didn't realise you didn't have it.
> The dependencies allow an old libk5crypto3 to be installed alongside a
> new
> "Samuel" == Samuel Thibault writes:
Samuel> Why? Having spurious symbols doesn't break the build, and
Samuel> these are internal symbols so that shouldn't harm
Samuel> reverse-dependencies.
Actually, the way I have it configured, extra symbols should break the
build. I want
> "Samuel" == Samuel Thibault writes:
Samuel> strlcat and strlcpy were indeed added to glibc in version
Samuel> 2.38, so it's not surprising that krb5 doesn't define its
Samuel> internal versions any more, and the attached patch can
Samuel> probably be applied?
I guess I'd
Sam Hartman, le lun. 14 août 2023 10:14:46 -0600, a ecrit:
> > "Samuel" == Samuel Thibault writes:
>
> Samuel> strlcat and strlcpy were indeed added to glibc in version
> Samuel> 2.38, so it's not surprising that krb5 doesn't define its
> Samuel> internal versions any more, and the attached
Source: krb5
Version: 1.20.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hello,
krb5 fails to build against glibc 2.38:
dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libkrb5support0/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match
completely debian/libkrb5support0.symbols
--- debian/libkrb5support0.symbols
7 matches
Mail list logo
