On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 10:54:07 +0200 Bardi Laurent
wrote:
Hi,
at first thanks to all, workaround is working, the case can be closed.
Have a nice day.
--
logo-cnrs
Laurent Bardi
RSSI IPBS / CRSSI DR14
Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale
+33 5 61 17 59 05 | +33 6 23
Hi,
at first thanks to all, workaround is working, the case can be closed.
Have a nice day.
--
logo-cnrs
Laurent Bardi
RSSI IPBS / CRSSI DR14
Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale
+33 5 61 17 59 05 | +33 6 23 46 06 28 | laurent.ba...@ipbs.fr
UMR5089 | CNRS – UT3 | 205
Hi,
You can try the workaround described by Pirate:
"
A work around could be downgrading this gem manually. Can you try that?
See
https://wiki.debian.org/gitlab/troubleshooting#manually_installing_ruby_dependencies
Modify the gem install command to, gem install -v 3.23.4 google-protobuf
hi to all
thanks for your comments and helps, i just need a working solution. I
was thinking that with deb12 it will be more stable/up2date.
I m surprised that in a fresh install (ie with no modification to the
system ) it won t work.
Perhaps, in the future, will it be better to split the
ebian.org>
Cc : laurent.ba...@ipbs.fr
Objet : Re: Bug#1049343:
On 15/08/23 1:08 am, Nicolas Godet wrote:
Hi,
Same bug during Debian upgrade from 11 to 12 today.
Could be linked to google protobuf 3.24.0.
Another user on IRC does not have this issue and google-protobuf version in
/var/lib/gitlab/.gem
On 15/08/23 1:08 am, Nicolas Godet
wrote:
Hi,
Same bug during Debian upgrade from 11 to 12 today.
Could be linked to google protobuf 3.24.0.
Another user on IRC
Hi,
Same bug during Debian upgrade from 11 to 12 today.
Could be linked to google protobuf 3.24.0.
Another user on IRC does not have this issue and google-protobuf version in
/var/lib/gitlab/.gem/gems/ is 3.23.4 while I have 3.24.0
Regards,
Package: gitlab
Version: 16.0.7+ds1-3~fto12+2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was
8 matches
Mail list logo