Bug#1049413: librsvg: Update to 2.56 or later

2024-01-30 Thread Matthias Geiger
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:33:44 +0200 Matthias Geiger wrote: [...] > - yeslogic-fontconfig-sys > yeslogic-fontconfig-sys actually is in debian. I can package all those; this might be needed wrt to 1062016. Partial vendoring might also be a solution here. best, -- Matthias Geiger Debian

Bug#1049413: librsvg: Update to 2.56 or later

2023-10-07 Thread Matthias Geiger
On 15.08.23 14:25, Jeremy Bícha wrote: Source: librsvg Version: 2.54.7+dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: werdah...@riseup.net It would be nice if we updated librsvg to 2.56 (GNOME 44 series) or 2.58 (GNOME 45 series). But 2.56 drops the vendored Rust crate dependencies, forcing us to

Bug#1049413: librsvg: Update to 2.56 or later

2023-08-15 Thread Matthias Geiger
On 15.08.23 19:19, Simon McVittie wrote: On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 18:41:49 +0200, Matthias Geiger wrote: the latest rsvg would need ~ 10 NEW rust packages if it were to be devendored. iirc you can actually run "cargo vendor" and it would revendor the tarball (even with out upstream vendoring it).

Bug#1049413: librsvg: Update to 2.56 or later

2023-08-15 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 1:19 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > Given the policy that Jeremy linked to, I imagine Ubuntu will want to > produce a fully-vendored tarball, even if Debian does not. I briefly mentioned this issue to Ubuntu's Main Inclusion team today and their Rust vendoring policy might be

Bug#1049413: librsvg: Update to 2.56 or later

2023-08-15 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 18:41:49 +0200, Matthias Geiger wrote: > the latest rsvg would need ~ 10 NEW rust packages if it were to be > devendored. iirc you can actually run "cargo vendor" and it would revendor > the tarball (even with out upstream vendoring it). Given the policy that Jeremy linked

Bug#1049413: librsvg: Update to 2.56 or later

2023-08-15 Thread Matthias Geiger
On 15.08.23 15:34, Jeremy Bícha wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 9:05 AM Simon McVittie wrote: Are you sure you mean 2.58? https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg seems to be version 2.56.92 right now, which suggests that GNOME 45 will have librsvg 2.57.x. … so maybe we can at least go to 2.55.x,

Bug#1049413: librsvg: Update to 2.56 or later

2023-08-15 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 9:05 AM Simon McVittie wrote: > Are you sure you mean 2.58? https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg seems > to be version 2.56.92 right now, which suggests that GNOME 45 will have > librsvg 2.57.x. > … > so maybe we can at least go to 2.55.x, even if moving beyond there is

Bug#1049413: librsvg: Update to 2.56 or later

2023-08-15 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 08:25:55 -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > It would be nice if we updated librsvg to 2.56 (GNOME 44 series) or > 2.58 (GNOME 45 series). Are you sure you mean 2.58? https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg seems to be version 2.56.92 right now, which suggests that GNOME 45 will

Bug#1049413: librsvg: Update to 2.56 or later

2023-08-15 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: librsvg Version: 2.54.7+dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: werdah...@riseup.net It would be nice if we updated librsvg to 2.56 (GNOME 44 series) or 2.58 (GNOME 45 series). But 2.56 drops the vendored Rust crate dependencies, forcing us to either revendor librsvg or use the Debian